similar to: Mods that allow R scripts

I've patched R so that it can be used as a scripting language, i.e. you can (on Unix-like systems) write files containing R code and execute them non-interactively, e.g.: #!/usr/local/lib/R/bin/R.bin --script cat("Hello World!\n") I've updated the patches for R-1.7.0; if you're interested in the patches, e-mail me at mckay@gmr.com, and I'll send them to you. --

Is there anyway I can write a script which feed input datasource from stdin and let R process it (maybe frequency report) then output the report to stdout? I can't seem to find much info on documentation or FAQ on this topic. Thanks! Soichi Hayashi ********************************************************************** The information contained in this communication is confidential,

I've updated my scripting patches to R-1.8.0. These patches allow you to write shell scripts in R (at least on *nix systems) by putting #!/path/to/R.bin --script on the first line of the script file. If you're interested in the patches, e-mail me at mckay@gmr.com -- Neil D. McKay, Mail Code 480-106-359 Phone: (586)986-1470 (GM:8-226-1470) Manufacturing Systems Research Lab

Full_Name: Neil McKay Version: 1.8.0 OS: Linux (RedHat 7.1) Submission from: (NULL) (129.124.42.210) I get a core dump when executing the following code: > library("tcltk") > zzz<-tclArray() > tclvalue(zzz) Running under gdb gives this output: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. makeRTclObject (tclobj=0x0) at tcltk.c:48 48

Hi there, I am trying to find an example how to use Rscript Let's suppose I want to pass 3 arguments (I don't want [options] and -e [expressions] as described in help) *on the command line myRscript.R -arg1=value1 -arg2=value2 -arg3=value3 *In the script #! /path/to/Rscript args = commandArgs(TRUE); >From what I see args is just a string, do I do things correctly ? -- View this

To all, Does anyone know whether there are any Discrete Choice Modeling modules for R?? Thanks, Charlie ------------------------- Charles H. Rosa, Ph.D. Staff Research Engineer General Motors Corporation R&D and Planning Mail Code 480-106-359 30500 Mound Rd Warren, MI 48090-9055 Tel/work/cell: +1 248 670-8389 Fax/work: +1 586 986-0574

Hello everyone, This should be an easy question, I think. I'd like to write a command in a program to set the working directory to whatever directory the file is currently stored in. Suppose I have a file called "myRscript.r", and it's stored in "C:\Rprojects\myRscript.r", and it references other R scripts and data files in the same directory. If I enter the

Hey Wilhelm, That's a bug, the "interrupt" attribute is not being recognized by the backend. I have fixed it in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/339b34266c1b54a9b5ff2f83cfb1da9cd8c9d90a Pull the latest LLVM and it should be fixed. On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:00 AM Wilhelm Meier <wilhelm.meier at hs-kl.de> wrote: > Hi Dylan, > > I used the following

Hi Dylan, looks ok now. One thing: the ISR is now: __vector_21: ; @__vector_21 __vector_21$local: sei push r0 push r1 in r0, 63 push r0 clr r0 push r24 lds r24, v1 sts v2, r24 pop r24 pop r0 out 63, r0 pop r1 pop r0 reti There are unneccessary push/pops of r1 and r0 too, since the clr is useless ... GCC had the same

On 12 September 2017 at 15:29, Alan McKay <alan.mckay at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have been googling for a few weeks now and not finding anything. > Apache 2.2 is EOL at the end of this year. > > Has Red Hat announced a plan yet on what they are doing in RHEL6? > > I am assuming they will up-version from 6.9 to 6.10 and as part of > that upgrade from

I think you can probably treat that as a broad ‘no objection’ by the community. Are there any other active contributors to the AVR back end? David > On 27 Oct 2015, at 09:41, Dylan McKay via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Ping. > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Dylan McKay <dylanmckay34 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > I have

On 09/12/2017 02:58 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 12 September 2017 at 15:29, Alan McKay <alan.mckay at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I have been googling for a few weeks now and not finding anything. >> Apache 2.2 is EOL at the end of this year. >> >> Has Red Hat announced a plan yet on what they are doing in RHEL6? >> >> I am

Replying here, but several of the questions raised boil down to "couldn't you make the usage of GetUnderlyingObject conservatively correct?". I'll try and address that. I think this *is* the right approach, but I think it is very hard to do without effectively disabling this part of GlobalsModRef. That is, the easy ways are likely to fire very frequently IMO. The core idea is

Is there anything I can do about it? BTW: gcc is loosing the AVR backend, so I would assume, there will be a greater interest to this in llvm compared to the past. Thanks, Wilhelm Am 03.04.20 um 15:09 schrieb Wilhelm Meier via llvm-dev: > Should I create an issue in bugzilla for this? Just to be reminded ... > > Am 31.03.20 um 09:34 schrieb Wilhelm Meier via llvm-dev: >> Hi

Greetings folks! I would like to enable globalsmodref-aa in the non-LTO pass pipeline so that it gets tested more and there are fewer differences between the two. For all of my benchmarks, this is performance neutral, but I'd appreciate others benchmarking this combination to see if they see any benefits or regressions. You can demo this mode easily: -mllvm -enable-non-lto-gmr Please let me

Hi Dylan, the following code volatile uint8_t v1; volatile uint8_t v2; __attribute__((interrupt)) void __vector_21(void) { v2 = v1; } produces in C mode: 00000092 <__vector_21>: 92: 80 91 61 00 lds r24, 0x0061 ; 0x800061 <v1> 96: 80 93 60 00 sts 0x0060, r24 ; 0x800060 <__data_end> 9a: 08 95 ret and in C++ mode: 00000074

Hi Chandler, I would like to run some benchmarks on ARM hardware and to look at impact of your patches on LTO. Kind regards, Evgeny Astigeevich From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Chandler Carruth Sent: 15 July 2015 10:45 To: Chandler Carruth; Gerolf Hoflehner Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] GlobalsModRef

Hey, thanks for benchmarking. How stable is the 2% regression? Michael ran some benchmarks with GlobalsModRef completely disabled and the only differences were in the noise. This was a complete spec2k6 run along with some others. Based on the number of benchmarks run there, I'm going to go ahead and submit these patches, but if you can clarify the impact here, we can look at potentially some

Greetings, I have seen a few postings in the past regarding the interop of Asterisk and the Cisco 7920 WiFi phone. To date, I have not seen a definitive method to getting the phone working. Assuming someone has this actually working, can that person step up and answer these questions. 1) What Channel is it working with (chan_skinny or chan_sccp)? 2) If code was used that is not a part of a

Hey Wilhelm, Could you post the LLVM IR generated from your C++ file? This can be achieved with 'clang -S -emit-llvm' Cheers On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 6:36 PM Wilhelm Meier <wilhelm.meier at hs-kl.de> wrote: > Answering partly to myself there was a extern "C" missing. > > But the register pushes ans reti are still missing. > > Whats wrong? > > Am