similar to: wxruby-swig compile/rake problem

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "wxruby-swig compile/rake problem"

2005 Feb 04
8
wxruby swig update
Good news and bad news. First he good news. wxruby-swig now compiles on Linux, Mac, and Windows using wxWidgets 2.5. I just patched a bug with the paint method today, but it''s getting very close to the first release of wxruby. With a little more cleanup, I think we''re getting ready to do a first release of it, which will hopefully replaced wxruby. Of course, the debug spew
2006 Feb 17
7
Re: Problem building wxRuby: htmlproc.h not found
Hi, Has this problem been resolved? I encountered the same problem on my FC3 system with wxGTK-2.4.2 and wxruby-0.6. Thanks. Stephen [Wxruby-users] Re: Problem building wxRuby: htmlproc.h not found *Nick* devel at nicreations.com
2004 Sep 01
2
wxruby swig progress
I''ve checked a number of new .i files into the wxruby-swig tree. Not all of them are fully tested, but I thought it would be better for them to be there than to have somebody start duplicating the work. I''ve also added the ''caret'' and ''image'' samples, as well as the generic etc/test.rb. These need the unreleased SWIG-1.3.22. The current
2005 Jul 20
3
Plans to rename wxruby-swig to wxruby2
Greetings all, Over the last few months, while I have been busy on other projects, Nick and other folks have built wxruby-swig up to where it now supports about 120 classes, compared to the 139 in wxruby 0.6. When you include the fact that wxruby 0.6 had a few classes that really weren''t needed (because non-wx ruby versions work fine), it looks like wxruby-swig is actually very
2005 Feb 20
11
Suggestion for wxruby name change
We''ve had some discussion in the past about the wxruby vs wxruby-swig name, and how they are a bit confusing. My big problem with ''wxruby-swig'' is that unless you know what ''swig'' is, it''s not a terribly useful (or sexy) postfix. It''s like naming a car after it''s manufacturing process - "the all new Acura
2004 Dec 17
14
WxRuby-SWIG and WxWidgets 2.5.x
A while back there was a discussion about what version of WxWidgets to target with WxRuby-SWIG. I don''t remember seeing any resolution, but I gather that thus far WxRuby-SWIG has continued to target 2.4.2, with the thinking that WxRuby-SWIG would quickly mature to the point that it could replace WxRuby, and once that was done the focus would shift to working with 2.5.x.
2004 Nov 21
7
wxRuby 0.6.0 is released!
wxRuby 0.6.0 has been released and is now available for download from RubyForge at http://wxruby.rubyforge.org/ This release includes binary builds for Max OS X and MS Windows. Changes in this release include: * Additional widget support in XRC (thanks to Marshall Elfstrand) * Addition of wxScrollbar (thanks to Hans Harmon of Pinnacle Technologies Inc) * Addition of wxGrid event handlers (thanks
2004 Sep 24
7
wxRuby build problems
I''ve just tried to build wxRuby on a debian/unstable (i386) platform. I went to rubyforge.org and downloaded wxruby-0.5-src.tar.gz. <http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/1254/wxruby-0.5-src.tar.gz> I have ruby 1.8.2 installed on my system. I needed to install the debian package ruby1.8-dev in order to get mkmf.rb. That solved my first problem. So then i ran "ruby
2005 Feb 07
7
New Docs - First Look
Ok, my first complete swipe for the new docs (but still with old rdoc default output templates) can be seen at: http://www.mktec.com/dev_www/wxruby-docs/ Most of the classes/methods documentation came out fine, but I still need finetune because some methods don''t get documented at all, like methods in the classes Bitmap and Frame. Once I can get it so all things get documented
2004 Apr 10
5
wxRuby-SWIG 0.0.3 is available
REMINDER: wxruby-swig is an experimental rewrite of wxRuby, using SWIG. It is not yet useful. The official wxRuby is still at 0.2.1. The 0.0.3 release of wxruby-swig is able to run the "minimal.rb" sample, which includes menu event handling. As always, it is available at: http://qualitycode.com/repos/wxruby-swig/ I also created a tarball this time, so you can just download that and
2004 Apr 24
1
wxruby-swig 0.0.7
I just pushed a new wxruby-swig, which includes the known MSWin rakefile changes. It also has some significant internal improvements that will make it easier to add classes, and it includes support for one new class (wxEvent). wxruby-swig is now licensed under the "MIT license". wxRuby will remain under the wxWindows license as long as we are releasing the old code base. When we
2004 Apr 25
2
wxruby-swig 0.0.9
More progress on wxruby-swig. Nothing too exciting. It now support 36 classes, compared to the (apparently) 139 supported by wxRuby 0.3. A working version of the calendar sample is included. I made several changes to the sample. I have tentatively decided *not* to wrap the wxDateTime class, and instead to automatically convert to/from Ruby''s own DateTime class. My logic is that in
2004 Aug 27
4
SWIG Bug
In trying to add wxTextCtrl to wxruby-swig, I''ve been running into a problem with the argument conversion that appears to be a SWIG director bug. It is tied to multiple inheritance, and is related to SWIG specifically making director''s ''initialize'' take a first argument, but because ''initialize'' is static there isn''t a self value
2004 Sep 28
9
Open call to try wxruby-swig
Hi Everyone, Over the past couple of weeks wxruby-swig has made a lot of progress. Over 100 classes have been added with attempts to mimic the existing wxruby interfaces. While still not as stable as wxruby, stability has increased dramatically. Finally, it has been built on Linux, Mac, and MSVC. This email is an invitation to try out wxruby-swig for yourself. The source code is in CVS and
2004 Aug 06
12
0.4.0 Compiling Under Mingw
> I am compiling wxRuby 0.4.0 on WinXP Home under MingW and MSYS 1.0. I can > compile wxWindows and Ruby fine and I get about 20 minutes into the wxRuby > compile and it quits, It says: [snip] > C:\mingw\bin\..\lib\gcc-lib\mingw32\3.2.3\..\..\..\..\mingw32\bin\ld.exe : > cannot find -lwxmsw241d > make: *** [wxruby.so] Error 1 > I replaced the $LIBS in the extconf.rb file
2004 Sep 18
4
wxruby-swig problem: MDIChildFrame::Maximize
I just grabbed the latest wxruby-swig from cvs and tried to compile it (without enabling the SWIG step) on my gentoo Linux box. I get: g++ -c -I/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-2.4 -DGTK_NO_CHECK_CASTS -D__WXGTK__ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -O2 -march=athlon-xp -fPIC -I /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.4.8/bin -I /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.4.8/lib -I
2004 Sep 18
10
wxruby-swig: Converting to REXML
Since I''m setting up my development environment on a new system, I figure now is the time to get rid of one of the extra dependencies: NQXML. It appears that REXML can now parse the whole classes xml file in about 20 seconds on this machine, which is a huge improvement over the many, many minutes it used to take. So I am now updating extract.rb to use REXML instead of NQXML.
2004 Oct 06
11
find_window_by_xxx doesn''t find Gauge or BitmapButton
I''m fairly new to the Ruby world, particularly WxRuby, so please forgive me if this is ground that''s been covered in the past. I''m trying to load a frame from an XRC file (created using DialogBlocks), and I''m having trouble getting an instance of the Gauge object using the Wx::Window.find_window_by_xxx methods. I''m trying this on Windows XP,
2004 Jun 11
5
Re: FW: problems installing wxruby
Jeremy Stell-Smith wrote: > Thanks a lot for the help, guys. I''m up and running with 2.4.2, but I > did have a few questions. Excellent. > So first, a friend and I basically have this month to dedicate to trying > to get a ruby ide pilot built on top of wxRuby. So, no, I really can''t > wait a few weeks to start. Any chance you could commit changes into cvs
2005 Jul 19
5
More wxruby-swig changes
I just checked in several changes from Sean Long that should make wxruby-swig work with wx 2.6 as well as 2.5. I also committed his changes to extconf.rb. But could someone please explain to me why anyone would prefer to use extconf.rb instead of rake? It just seems like one more piece of code to maintain, and I don''t like extra code. Sean: The other diffs in the patch you sent were