Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Bug report: R 2.14.0dev Sweave option width does not work"
2011 Oct 04
2
R-devel (2.14 alpha) Windows binary
Hello,
This question popped up on the bioc-devel list, I'm forwarding it here.
I know that sources for R-2.14 alpha can be found here:
http://cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/
But the OP (below) is asking about Windows binaries.
Dan
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stefan McKinnon H?j-Edwards <Stefan.Hoj-Edwards at agrsci.dk>
Date: 2011/10/4
Subject: Re:
2013 Feb 27
2
Keeping up to date with R-devel
Hi,
is checking out R SVN trunk the recommended way to keep up to date with
R-devel and check packages with the latest version?
My objective is to be able to have both R and R-devel versions
installed/working and up to date.
R-devel binaries would be available as symlinks in my home directory so
that I can do:
Rdevel CMD check mypkg
Rdscript -e "some R code"
anywhere on my system.
2011 Nov 18
3
Windows binaries: Version and revision strings show "(2006-00-00 r00000)"
FYI,
for the last few revision the version string for both R v2.14.0
patched and R devel are not correct for the Windows binaries. This is
what R --version and sessionInfo() report since a couple of days:
R version 2.14.0 Patched (2006-00-00 r00000)
R Under development (unstable) (2006-00-00 r00000)
Also, "r00000" is listed as the revision on:
2003 Sep 11
1
potentially nasty interaction between R 1.8.0 and tetex
I've been having problems building vignettes in bioconductor packages
with R-devel. Turns out that Rdevel/share/texmf/hyperref.cfg wants
Blue and Red predefined, when only blue and red are defined (as of
rsync Rdevel, Sept 10th). This is on a Debian unstable system (Sept
9th version). Might not apply to all other tetex systems. Seems to
have bitten the bioconductor build system, though.
2017 Jun 23
2
v3.4.0-2 incompatible with gcc 7.1
Thank you for correcting my misunderstandings, Professor. Compiling from
source did the trick, and I'll be following up with the arch maintainers
about addressing the issue on their end.
Best,
Chris
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 at 11:02 Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk>
wrote:
> R is compatible with GCC 7.1 ! New compiler versions are tested, as
> well as those under
2013 Jan 16
1
Trouble building package using R in development
Dear List,
I'm having considerable trouble setting up my environment (Linux, Fedora
16, Bash) to build and check packages under R Under Development
(r61660). I'm doing this to better get a handle on difference in the
output from running checks on examples in one of my packages. Note I
compiled R Under Development myself
The problem I am now having is whenever I try to build my analogue
2018 Mar 05
2
Problem with Rd2.tex tduring compilation
Hello, I am receiving this message when uploading my R package to rdevel.
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/180305_110240_Compositional_29/00check.log
Can anybody please help?
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2005 Mar 24
2
rw2010alpha
Until recently R 2.1.0 was called rw2010dev. I just visited
http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/rdevel.html
and noticed its now called rw2010alpha, not rw2010dev. I would like
to use it without downloading all the libraries over again.
Can I
- just rename my rw2010dev folder (Windows XP) to
rw2010alpha and then install rw2010alpha to that? or
- install it in a separate
2017 Jun 23
2
v3.4.0-2 incompatible with gcc 7.1
I'm on Arch Linux kernel version 4.11.6-1 using gcc version 7.1.1:
gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170516
I have installed R through the arch package manager pacman and when I
attempt to initiate it, R crashes stating a missing dependency:
/usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R: error while loading shared libraries:
libgfortran.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I thought
2017 Jun 24
1
v3.4.0-2 incompatible with gcc 7.1
Thanks Ista, that's good to know. Did you install from pacman?
Chris
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 at 20:35 Ista Zahn <istazahn at gmail.com> wrote:
> FWIW, I don't have any problems with R on Arch Linux.
>
> On Jun 23, 2017 1:32 PM, "Chris Cole" <chris.c.1221 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for correcting my misunderstandings, Professor. Compiling from
2018 Jan 30
2
as.list method for by Objects
Dario,
What version of R are you using. In my mildly old 3.4.0 installation and in
the version of Revel I have lying around (also mildly old...) I don't see
the behavior I think you are describing
> b = by(1:2, 1:2, identity)
> class(as.list(b))
[1] "list"
> sessionInfo()
R Under development (unstable) (2017-12-19 r73926)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
2015 Feb 24
3
alternatives to do.call() when namespace is attached but not loaded?
Dear R-devel
I have a function in a package that essentially provides a wrapper for a
group of functions in another Suggested package (it sets appropriate
defaults for the context, transforms output, etc). I've implemented
this by verifying that the package was loaded with
require(sna)
and then
do.call(snaFunName, args = args)
The rDevel check is requesting that I use
2018 Mar 05
2
Σχετ: Problem with Rd2.tex tduring compilation
Hi and thanks for the prompt reply. I cannot say I understood or know what to do.
Can you please tell me which is this mailing list?
???? 2:15 ?.?. ???????, 5 ??????? 2018, ?/? Michael Dewey <lists at dewey.myzen.co.uk> ??????:
The error is that one of your documentation files is failing. Try
compiling each one separately with
R CMD Rd2pdf yourfilenamehere.Rd
and see what
2004 Mar 04
3
can you library(MASS) with R 1.9.0?
I'm trying to track down a rather critical problem. This happens both
on Debian's current unstable as well a from anoncvs built this
morning, reinstalling MASS. Is anyone else seeing this or am I just
broken and special?
609$ /home/Rdevel/bin/R
R : Copyright 2004, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Version 1.9.0 Under development (unstable) (2004-03-04), ISBN
3-900051-00-3
R
2012 Mar 14
3
merge bug fix in R 2.15.0
Is it intended that the first suffix can no longer be blank? Seems to be
caused by a bug fix to merge in R 2.15.0.
$Rdevel --vanilla
DF1 = data.frame(a=1:3,b=4:6)
DF2 = data.frame(a=1:3,b=7:9)
merge(DF1,DF2,by="a",suffixes=c("",".1"))
Error in merge.data.frame(DF1, DF2, by = "a", suffixes = c("", ".1")) :
there is already a column
2018 Mar 05
0
Problem with Rd2.tex tduring compilation
The error is that one of your documentation files is failing. Try
compiling each one separately with
R CMD Rd2pdf yourfilenamehere.Rd
and see what happens.
There is a list especially for package developers which might be better
in future.
Michael
On 05/03/2018 10:51, michael tsagris via R-help wrote:
> Hello, I am receiving this message when uploading my R package to rdevel.
>
2004 Sep 09
1
man page of hist points to truehist, which can't be viewed without loading a library?
rdevel from yesterday, also in 1.9.1 (Debian, -3).
The man page of 'hist' (from the graphics package, obtained by
"?hist") suggests 'truehist' under "see also", but 'truehist' isn't
loaded by default (a sensible "of course"), so that "?truehist" fails.
One can do help.search(), of course, which points what to do, but
leads to my
2005 Sep 29
1
Does the "installWithVers=TRUE" setting for the install.packages/update.packages flag updates?
It might be my settings or improper use -- but if I use the
"installWithVers=TRUE" flag for update.packages(), I don't seem to get
updates;
and if I use "install.packages(new.packages(),installWithVers=TRUE)",
it seems to (re-)install identical versions of what I have.
(this is with Rdevel from subversion from yesterday)
best,
-tony
blindglobe at gmail.com
Muttenz,
2020 Jun 21
1
Possible bug in heatmap()?
Dear All,
There might be a bug in heatmap():
x <- matrix(rnorm(10*5), 10, 5)
heatmap(x, labCol=1:5)
Error in axis(1, 1L:nc, labels = labCol, las = 2, line = -0.5, tick = 0, :
'at' and 'labels' lengths differ, 5 != 10
Works fine under 4.0.1. Looking at the code from 4.0.1 vs. Rdevel, esp. this part sticks out:
labRow <- labRow[rowInd] %||% rownames(x) %||%
2009 Oct 13
2
Sweave output encoding in R-2.10.0beta on Windows (Rgui <-> Rterm)
Dear developers,
I have come across a (somewhat strange) change in the encoding of Sweave
output from R-2.9.2pat to R-2.10.0beta (apparently specific to Rgui) on
Windows installations. Of course, the NEWS file contains quite a few
changes concerning encoding, but I was not able to locate an entry which
explains the observed behaviour. I am not very familiar with
encodings/locales/codepages,