similar to: Compilation problems on Digital Unix 4.0c with gcc (PR#418)

Hi, Is there a way to modify the string such as char a or char b? Could I use the way like "Replace an instruction with another Value" in Programm Manual? In fact, what I am interested in is string with visible expression, not all string, and I am trying to hide the orignal string by using simple way like XOR.. Is there a way to reorder the basic blocks? Thanks. Qiuyu C Source

--0__=88256B040001210F8f9e8a93df938690918c88256B040001210F Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii {Please ignore earlier message; I forgot R.version} Not sure whether the R pdf driver is the problem, or some HP problem, or local, but the zip file below has a simple R script [pdfbug.r] using pdf () to create R2pdf.pdf that causes a "79.00FE PRINTER ERROR" on a HP 5000 N LaserJet

On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 08:58, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Tanu Sharma wrote: > > > I have trouble using the llvm tools.Some of the errors are : > > > > $ llvm-dis prog.bc > > $ llvm-dis: Invalid Top Level Block Length! Type:1, Size:456 (Vers=0, Pos=12) > > Can you explain how you generated this bytecode file? It looks corrupted > or

--0__=88256B050063F04C8f9e8a93df938690918c88256B050063F04C Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii The attached script produces "Error in plot.xy ... negative length vectors are not allowed" when using pdf() but not when using postscript (). platform sparc-sun-solaris2.8 arch sparc os solaris2.8 system sparc, solaris2.8 status major 1 minor 3.1 year 2001 month

Well, the complexity only occurs on x86, other archs are simpler. Since this is not used much outside the c library, I can work around it in the library and be satisifed with the simple case. Oh, I suppose I should mention what I was working on. I made a syscall intrinsic with codegen for linux/x86. It seemed a missing peice in having a pure llvm compiled userland (mostly, being able to have a

Hi, > On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Zhang Qiuyu wrote: > > > Is there a way to modify the string such as char a or char b? Could I > > use the way like "Replace an instruction with another Value" in Programm > > Manual? In fact, what I am interested in is string with visible > > expression, not all string, and I am trying to hide the orignal string > > by

Well first problem I see is you editied your sbm.conf...Should be smb.conf ;-) Can you access it as root? Id start by making sure the permissions are correct. And that the Sharename in smb.conf matches the folder name on the server and that the path is correct. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:10:54 -0600 From:

Chris Lattner wrote: > > int main() > > { > > int r(0); > > for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) > > r += i; > > ; > > return r; > > } > > When I compiled it, I got the following LLVM code: The code I get is somewhat different: int %main() { entry: %tmp.1.i = load bool* %Initialized.0__ ; <bool> [#uses=1] br

Pues parece que el problema si es de lme4, cuya versión 1.0-4 se publicó en septiembre de este año. En la página en cran del paquete pone "The core computational algorithms are implemented using the Eigen C++ library for numerical linear algebra and RcppEigen "glue" " . El tema es que al utilizar esta versión junto con la librería boot, el tiempo de cálculo se incrementa

Thanks for replying, Yes, I think too that the bytecode file is corrupted. This is the file : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok. gracias por la ayuda. Pero mis sospechas van encaminadas hacia la librería boot o parallel, o alguna librería de ubuntu 13.10 que gestione BLAS o similar, ya que el modelo con lme4 si ajusta. En R 3.0.2 , tarda 200 segundos en hacer 5 remuestreos (utilizando un sólo núcleo), pero no termina nunca si le especifico parallel="multicore", ncpus=4L Pero el caso es que si miro los

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418 Summary: Allow to build on systems without IPV6 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418 dirk.meyer at dinoex.sub.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Miscellaneous |Build system ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the

On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Tanu Sharma wrote: > I have trouble using the llvm tools.Some of the errors are : > > $ llvm-dis prog.bc > $ llvm-dis: Invalid Top Level Block Length! Type:1, Size:456 (Vers=0, Pos=12) Can you explain how you generated this bytecode file? It looks corrupted or something. Also, can you send the actual bytecode file itself? Thanks! -Chris >

> Ok, I am developing an intrinsic instruction and I have the codegen > working (and tested). However, some of the more complex cases of the > intrinsic are reducable to LLVM + simpler cases of the intrinsic. How > would I go about conditionally reducing the intrinsic? I could deal > with the issue in the codegen, but that gets ugly quickly. > > Andrew I suppose you could

Ok, I am developing an intrinsic instruction and I have the codegen working (and tested). However, some of the more complex cases of the intrinsic are reducable to LLVM + simpler cases of the intrinsic. How would I go about conditionally reducing the intrinsic? I could deal with the issue in the codegen, but that gets ugly quickly. Andrew -------------- next part -------------- A non-text

la libreria lm4 cambio con la versón 3 de R. Fijate en las versiones Prof. Julio Di Rienzo Estadística y Biometría FCA- U.N. Córdoba IBS-RARG President http://sites.google.com/site/juliodirienzo "Biometry, the active pursuit of biological knowledge by quantitative methods." (R.A. Fisher, 1948) 2013/10/24 Carlos Ortega <cof@qualityexcellence.es> > Hola, > > Quizás para

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > I've just downloaded the latest release of LLVM, and playing with the > following simple example: > > int main() > { > int r(0); > for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) > r += i; > ; > return r; > } When I compiled it, I got the following LLVM code: int %main() { entry: call void %__main( )

I am looking for a good provider for IAX2/800 termination. I am currently using FreeWorldTel and wanted to use NuFone but it seems that both of them don't provide customer service. FreeWorld has terrible voice quality and NuFone never answers their phone or responds to messages. Thanks, Linn

Hello, I've just downloaded the latest release of LLVM, and playing with the following simple example: int main() { int r(0); for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) r += i; ; return r; } I compile it and then run: analyze -indvars x.bc which prints: Printing analysis 'Induction Variable Analysis' for function 'main': and nothing else. It is a