Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "March7th R-devel,hpux10.20,egcs-2.93.03 19990124"
2001 Sep 25
2
hpux10.20 build for R-1.3.1
Hello,
I am trying to build R-1.3.1 on hpux10.20 with gcc and HP's
fort77. here is my configure:
./configure --prefix=/home/absd00t/local --with-readline
--with-gnome=no --with-f77=fort77
I also set CXXFLAGS= -I/usr/include/Motif1.2 -I/usr/include/X11R6
-I/home/absd00t/local/include
and LIBS= -L/home/absd00t/local/lib
so that readline.h and libs would be found. I have parts of gnome libs so
1999 Apr 12
1
R-0.65-April-12 on hpux10.20
Hello,
It looks like demo("dyn.load") is broken for non ".so" extentions.
> demo("dyn.load")
demo(dyn.load)
---- ~~~~~~~~
Type <Return> to start :
> dyn.load("zero.so")
Error in dyn.load(x) : unable to load shared library "/home/absd00t/zero.so":
can't open /home/absd00t/zero.so
>
It looks like zero.R
2000 Mar 22
4
R-release dynamic load problem on HPUX10.20
Hello,
I just pulled the patched release:
R-release Version 1.0.0 Patched (March 19, 2000), on HPUX10.2
I am having dynamic library load problems. I configured with:
./configure --prefix=/home/absd00t/local --with-readline --with-x
After changing etc/Makeconf to take -lblas out of libs (the blas
library provided by the system is not a shared library), system was
built without any interruptions.
2000 Aug 11
2
R-devel Aug-09 1.2.0 build on hpux10.20
Hello,
I had to set CPPFLAGS and FC=fort77 but configure saw atlas and used
it instead of blas. However atlas for hp seems to missing some libs. I
had to add -lblas in Makeconf. Everything builds ok. But modreg and
tcltk doesn't load.
R : Copyright 2000, The R Development Core Team
Version 1.2.0 Under development (unstable) (2000-August-9)
R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO
1998 Nov 16
2
0.63 missing .pl files in etc?
Just grabbed the R-0.63.tar.gz from CRAN. Again during the build make
fails. bin/build-help did not have exec permissions. After that, it
failed for missing *.pl files called from build-help. I just copied
them from an R-devel I had. Then make docs worked. However,
LibIndex was not built. I am on an hpux-pa1.1-hpux-10.20 using egcs:
gcc version egcs-2.92.18 19981101 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)
1998 Nov 16
2
0.63 missing .pl files in etc?
Just grabbed the R-0.63.tar.gz from CRAN. Again during the build make
fails. bin/build-help did not have exec permissions. After that, it
failed for missing *.pl files called from build-help. I just copied
them from an R-devel I had. Then make docs worked. However,
LibIndex was not built. I am on an hpux-pa1.1-hpux-10.20 using egcs:
gcc version egcs-2.92.18 19981101 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)
1998 Dec 07
1
R-0.63.1 library() command
Hello,
I just installed 0.63.1 (from diffs, patch seemed to work OK). I just
noticed that library() command is behaving differently. It is
outputting one line a time and I have to hit the "q" key to advance a
single line ! library(help=modreg) seems to be working OK. So are
other help commands (e.g. ?library). I can use less directly on the
LibIndex file without any problems (pages
1999 Mar 16
0
testparm error in HPUX10.20 w/ smb 2.0.0
Hello and thanks in advance for any tips or help.
I just finished loading the binaries and installing samba 2.0.0 for
HPUX10.20 using SAM. This is my second installation of samba on this
machine. I reused my old smb.conf file with little or no changes. (ok I
had to retype it from an older version because my machine died and
HP10.20 can't recover 10.0x version multiple tape backups, but I
1999 Dec 17
0
ANNOUNCE: preliminary HPUX10.20 port
Hi all,
I've done a basic port of OpenSSH 1.2.1pre18 to HPUX10.20. It looks like
everything's in there except utmp/wtmp/wtmpx support, which seems to be
a problem in general... In particular, X11 forwarding works (Oh yes!)
even though HP seem determined to break it. It's working well enough to
do continuing development work on, if that tells you anything about the
state of the port.
1998 Nov 10
0
Nov 5 R-devel build on hpux10.20
{Osman, I see that you are now in R-devel; your message to
R-help bounced, because of XsubscribeX (w/o "X") in text.
Martin Maechler; list manager}
I grabbed the nov 5 devel tarball and built the system. I had to make
hand changes to "readline" stuff. I also had to change build-help mod
to +x. Now library(xxx) is not working. I had to change eda and mva
zzz.R files by
2002 Aug 01
5
SUQ: Share permissions
After parsing through the various bits of available documentation, I'm
forced to bow before the group and ask the following Silly User Question:
While I can create and set NT ACLs on files/folder, anything in the root of
the share can be deleted by any user who has access to that share. I've
munged something in my file permissions. What /should/ the file permissions
for a root share
1999 Oct 14
2
EGCS broken; tested 2.95 through CVS current
Just so folks know, all the modern variants of EGCS (now named gcc) out there
appear to be producing occasionally bogus x86 FPU code at -O1 or higher. Guess
what... Vorbis trips the bug whatever it is.
I just grabbed and built the latest CVS code, and it's also broken. I'm constructing a small failure case example for a bug report now. It looks like FPU arithmetic into a register
1999 Mar 06
1
Difficulties with egcs-1.0.3 on RedHat 5.2?
Some machines in our department use RedHat 5.2 Linux but, to maintain
consistency with other machines, the compilers as from egcs-1.0.3, as
shown below. When I compile R-0.63.3 on these systems I can't pass
the tests in "make check". The base-Ex.R file stops execution with
the error shown below.
...
Running all help() examples ...
../../bin/R --vanilla < base-Ex.R >
1998 Oct 25
2
EGCS optimizer bug?
The current development version dies in qbeta() when compiled with
egcs -O, egcs 1.0.2 and glibc 2.0.7 (RedHat versions). Since this also
kill the F and t distributions, it doesn't exactly do wonders for R's
usefulness...
Anyone else seeing this or has my setup just gone out of whack? It
does look pretty much like a clear compiler bug when inlining math
functions (storing temporaries
2001 Aug 15
8
Serious GCC/EGCS 2.91 bug found (bites rc2)
Hi folks,
The folks on RedHat who have been complaining of poor-quality encodes
prompted us to track down the trouble, and it's a compiler bug. We
have the asm .s files to prove it :-)
The summary: EGCS (gcc) versions through March 1999, including up to
at least gcc/egcs 2.91.66 have a serious floating point optimization
bug that hits Vorbis. This is a fairly old gcc version, but RedHat
2001 Aug 15
8
Serious GCC/EGCS 2.91 bug found (bites rc2)
Hi folks,
The folks on RedHat who have been complaining of poor-quality encodes
prompted us to track down the trouble, and it's a compiler bug. We
have the asm .s files to prove it :-)
The summary: EGCS (gcc) versions through March 1999, including up to
at least gcc/egcs 2.91.66 have a serious floating point optimization
bug that hits Vorbis. This is a fairly old gcc version, but RedHat
1998 Mar 22
3
R-0.61.1 compiled with egcs-mingw32
I have made available the work of the last weekend that I mentioned
in my previous messages on ftp://sirio.stat.unipd.it/pub/R.
Many thanks to Peter D. and Ross I. for their suggestions.
If you think that the work is of some interest, I can upload it
to CRAN.
guido m.
This is the README enclosed in the distribution.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2001 Jan 10
1
virus
To win*/NT users:
I just recieved a mail from r-help with a virus attachment. I am on
an unix system but our mail server deleted the message anyways. here it is:
Received: by stat.math.ethz.ch (8.9.1/8.9.1) id RAA27614
for r-help-gang-use; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:01:56 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from daemon at localhost)
by stat.math.ethz.ch (8.9.1/8.9.1) id RAA27412
for
1998 Sep 16
2
R-beta: (0+0i)^2
The following behaviour (in R 0.62.3) is disturbing:
> (0+0i)^2
[1] NaN+NaNi
Is it deliberate??
Laimonis Kavalieris
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To:
1998 Sep 16
2
R-beta: (0+0i)^2
The following behaviour (in R 0.62.3) is disturbing:
> (0+0i)^2
[1] NaN+NaNi
Is it deliberate??
Laimonis Kavalieris
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: