similar to: make docs

Recent sensible changes to the dynload mechanism have made an old problem resurface: how should we deal with packages which contain Fortran code and may need to be linked against additional libraries such as -lf2c? The current consensus is that extra Fortran libraries maybe needed are handled via the make variable FLIBS, and that `-lf2c' or `-lg2c' are added by default if g77 is used.

I shouldn't try to do this on Monday morning. Can anyone suggest why the make for R 0.63 is failing for me under Solaris (SunOS 5.6). Paul Gilbert ... creating src/scripts/html2dos creating tests/Makefile creating tests/Examples/Makefile creating src/include/Platform.h R is now configured for sparc-sun-solaris2.6 Source directory: . Installation directory: /usr/local C

Full_Name: Frank Beimfohr Version: 0.64.1, devel. OS: Solaris 2.5.1 Submission from: (NULL) (129.217.131.31) I try to compile R on my Sparc 4 (Solaris 2.5.1) but the compilation fails. I tried the developer-version and the contributed 0.64.1-Version. I start configure with the --g77-Option. During the compilation it stops with an error, which says that the R/src/library/modreg/src/bsplvd.f

Hello, I tried to compile v2.3.1 on Solaris x86 with SUN Pro compilers. I had an error while stats libarary was being compiled and I notice that "-xtarget=generic64" was not passed to f95 while cc used it. Could you tell me how to fix this problem? f95 -PIC -O -I/mounts/devel/SUNWspro/prod/include -c sgram.f -o sgram.o f95 -PIC -O -I/mounts/devel/SUNWspro/prod/include -c

After some investigation I find that "R INSTALL dse" seems to work well. Also, "R REMOVE dse" works but does not clean out ~/.R (which would be pretty difficult because all users may have this). The result is that a user will have the impression that the package is installed when it has be remove. (This is probably not too serious.) However, "R INSTALL -l rlibs

Just for the fun of it (actually in order to test some Fortran more extensively), I've compiled and installed g77, yesterday on our Solaris 2.5.1 machines. After doing (in R's toplevel directory) make distclean ./configure now chooses g77 (instead of Sun's f77 which was chosen before). I now do make make check cd tests/Examples and carefully compare base-Ex.Rout to an

Dear R-help community, I have had trouble in the past installing the latest version of R: we got the errors shown below (the computer specifications and version of R are below that). Does anybody have tips for compiling the latest version of R so that I can avoid these errors? configure make ... ... ... f90: CODE: 0 WORDS, DATA: 0 WORDS gcc -G -L/usr/local/lib -o stats.so init.o kmeans.o

Hi, I'm trying to build a thesaurus that will sensible values for rare words. I suspect the best algorithm to use is k-means although I'm not sure about that -- I would have preferred a k dimensional space with a binary cluster in each dimension so a word can belong to 0..k clusters, but I digress... I can measure the strength of correlation between words fairly easily by counting

I'm just trying to install 62.1 under Solaris. Making the program reports no errors, but when I try to run R I get ld.so.1: /home/res8/gilp/R-versions/R-0.62.1/bin/R.binary: fatal: libF77.so.2: can't open file: errno=2 Is there any standard place where I should be looking to find libF77? When make moves on to building the documents I get the errors below. (Is this because configure did

I installed R-2.3.1 and ran make check without problem, but I am having trouble installing several packages using gcc (GCC) 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-53) on Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 7) Kernel 2.4.21-40.ELsmp on an x86_64 Below are the messages from MCMCpack. Perhaps my systems are messed up? Paul Gilbert > install.packages("MCMCpack")

I'm having trouble making todays development snapshot: -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -O2 -c stirlerr.c -o stirlerr.o stirlerr.c:34: conflicting types for `Rf_stirlerr' ../../src/include/R_ext/Mathlib.h:557: previous declaration of `Rf_stirlerr' make[3]: *** [stirlerr.o] Error 1 [20] /home/mfa5/gilp/R-versions/R-devel : uname -a SunOS mfa99579 5.6 Generic_105181-11 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10

I've loaded R-0.50-a1 but when I try to apply the patches it cannot find the files to apply patches to. [9] gilp/R0.50 : patch <R-0.50-a1.patch1 Looks like a new-style context diff. File to patch: [10] gilp/R0.50 : [10] gilp/R0.50 : [10] gilp/R0.50 : cd R-0.50-a1 [11] gilp/R0.50/R-0.50-a1 : ls CHANGES RESOURCES configure.mac* COPYING TASKS configure.win* COPYRIGHTS TASKS.OLD

Installing 0.61 in Solaris (SunOS 5.5) I am getting the following error when I try to make docs or make help [28] /home/res8/gilp/R : make docs make: Fatal error: Don't know how to make target `../src/library/*/man/*.Rd' Current working directory /home/res8/gilp/R-versions/R-0.61/etc Paul Gilbert -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel

I would appreciate getting a clarification of /usr/lib/R/library vs /usr/local/lib/R/site-library. I am running R 1.8 on Debian Linux. On one occasion doing update.packages() resulted in versions of one or more libraries being placed in one of these directories without removing the old version, and the old version took precedence over the new. I'm sorry I did not save the steps I used. I

I've just got a new workstation with Solaris 5.6 and seem to be having some R 0.61.1 installation problems that did not occur in 5.5. If anyone can see the problem I would appreciate suggestions. Following is output from make at the point of failure. TIA Paul Gilbert ... gcc -g -I../include -c relop.c gcc -g -I../include -c saveload.c In file included from

Hi again ! Thanks for the info on updating the config.site file which I have done. I have also added -lm in the Makeconf manually because this is needed explicitly for DEC cc. However, there are still a few problems when linking some of the files as you can see from the enclosed log. Ciao, Andreas ------------------------------------------------------- R-0.63.3>make make[1]: Entering

On 2015-10-15 15:02, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On 15/10/2015 13:32, Michael Felt wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Just wanted to let you know I am getting close to packaging R for AIX in rephrase - would like to be active in keeping R binaries current for AIX. My interest in not in R per se (rather a colleague who has a project that uses R, so I hope to assist him, and others like him).

Hello I have installed R-0.90.1 on my Linux (Redhat 6.2) machine, unfortunately I am not able to use a number of commands like e.g. smooth.spline and predict.smooth.spline. The error messages being given by is: Error: Object "smooth.spline" not found With the command library() I have checked or the libraries for the smoothing functions are there, as shown below. -------- >

Dear R-Help friends, I am unable to get the latest version of R (2.4.1) to compile on my solaris 10 system - has anybody else experienced this problem and are you able to offer me any advice? I appreciate your time, many thanks, Jenny Barnes Here are my CURRENT specifications: platform sparc-sun-solaris2.10 arch sparc os solaris2.10

This is a multipart MIME message. --==_Exmh_981436288450 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi ! I have problems compiling R successfully on a DEC-UINX 4.0E. I have applied the recommended config.site, which I enclose. As can be seen from the compilation log there are linking errors... I did a 'make check' which fails for the R