similar to: default gateway outside of the LAN

Hello All, I ended up answering my own question, but figured I'd share this and open up for discussion. It is possible to set a metric with 'route' or `ip route`. What I'm wondering is if there's a Red Hat/CentOS way of assigning a metric in the network-scripts? Answer: [0] (from 2008) works. ex: METRIC=10 Deployment Guides: EL5 [1] and EL6 [2] do not mention metrics on

Hi, I'd like to bond two existing interfaces and checked the RH EL 6.3 [1] doc. Comparing the current settings of e.g. eth0 to the example config in the docs I wonder what options I still have to use/copy and which I can drop. e.g. what should happen to my RH 6.3 eth0 settings not in the docs? DNS1="............" GATEWAY="........." HWADDR=".........."

On Wed, February 18, 2015 13:07, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:39 AM, James B. Byrne > <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: >> 2. How does one configure the routing table on network startup to >> specifically detail the route particular addresses are supposed to >> take? >> > > Not exactly sure how routing works with aliases on the same

<div style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: rgb(0, 0, 0); FONT-SIZE: 12px"><div>Thanks all for the suggested tips. I confess I tried VMWare hypervisor esxi and found it less complicated to get set up and functioning correctly. <br /><br />I'll have to take up KVM another day, when I'm in less of a hurry to get something up and running right away. <br

I want to add the following route command route add -net 192.168.2.0/27 gw 192.168.2.3 via the normal network setup. The result should be the following routing table (the first line): 192.168.2.0/27 via 192.168.2.3 dev xenbr1 scope link 192.168.2.0/27 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.4 192.168.2.0/27 dev xenbr1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.3 192.168.1.0/24 dev xenbr0

Hi, I'm wanting to configure a CentOS 6 server to have a fall-back default route via a second network interface. Given: - eth0 with 192.168.0.10 on subnet 192.168.0.0/24 gateway 192.168.0.1 - eth1 with 192.168.1.10 on subnet 192.168.1.0/24 gateway 192.168.1.1 Where eth0's network is a "back door" to the internet, and eth1's is the "front door", I believe I can

On 12 March 2015 at 13:43, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > I know how to use 'ip' to set up a static route, e.g.: > > ip route add 192.168.128.0/17 via 40.53.24.3 dev eth0 > > But if you reboot or restart network, you loose this. Thus you have to > make it persistant. I found: > >

> On May 30, 2017, at 3:26 AM, Walter H. <walter.h at mathemainzel.info> wrote: > > is there a way to influence the order? Not sure what your use of multiple IPs is. . . but I'd probably use an interface alias instead of secondary. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Deployment_Guide/s2-networkscripts-interfaces-alias.html

Hi, after trying for days I ended up with a working tinc configurazion of 2 subnets, now my goal is to add 2 more subnets and comunicate. I might seem dumb at this point but honestly I don't work in IT or Networking stuff, and so I dont have that deep knowledge. A little explanation of my configuration is HOST A (VPN server) Public IP: 1.2.3.4 tun0 Subnet = 192.168.10.0/24 tun0 IP =

Hello, I'm following instructions in http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.LVS-DR.html#route_on_non_ip_interface to allow my xen guest real hosts to serve virtual IP's behind LVS without having to allocate real public IP addresses for each such xen guest. I have eth1 connected via a "back-end" switch to the eth1/xenbr1 of the xen host and the other physical

On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 13:02 -0400, Mike - st257 wrote: > Paul, > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 17/03/16 04:47 PM, paul.greene.va at verizon.net wrote: > > Thanks, I followed the 2nd article, and it got the existing > virtual > > machines communicating with each other. > >

Paul, On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 17/03/16 04:47 PM, paul.greene.va at verizon.net wrote: > > Thanks, I followed the 2nd article, and it got the existing virtual > > machines communicating with each other. > Right, so your VMs are on the same bridge group now (at Layer2 of OSI). > > > > However, any new

I'm using a bunch of SPA942's, and I'm trying to provision them mostly by DHCP (and what I can't set that way, I try to provision via HTTP interface into the phone). I changed the domain in my AstLinux config from "astlinux" to redfish-solutions.com, and set that in my sip.conf file as well: context=incoming

Hi! I''m testing IPSec tunnels, having the following test schemma: Host A - eth0: 192.168.1.67 eth1: 192.168.10.1 Host B - eth0: 192.168.1.254 eth1: 192.168.20.1 I''ve succesfully configured an IPSec tunnel in order to safely communicate from 192.168.10.0/24 (which is obviously behind Host A), and 192.168.20.0/24 (obviously behind Host B) In this test

Dear list, I am having a problem with openvpn. I have the following arrangement, running two instances of openvpn on "home fw". I want to protect my WLAN in back of the home fw and that works fine. I can see "Peer connection initiated with 192.168.1.3:5000" in daemon.log on homefw. Nothing gets initiated with officefw, nor can I ping the other end of the tunnel at officefw.

Hi, guys! We need to setup our both network device on centos-4.5 as follow: eth0: IP: 192.168.1.0/24 GW 192.168.1.1 eth1: IP: 192.168.10.0/24 GW 192.168.10.1 We don't know how to create our setup files for both network (eth0, eth1 and their routes)? Help us, please. Thx Adriano

Hello @all, thanks for all the helpfull answers in this mailing list. They helped me compiling a new kernel 2.6.10.11 with Xen 2.0.6 (my first one), setting up a dom0 with RAID, LVM and loop devices for domU, integrating a second network as xen-br1 (I''m calling the /etc/xen/scripts/network script from within /etc/init.d/xend to bring up / down the second bridge.) and bootstrapping

Hi, I have a little problem to setup iproute in my network It looks like this: ---- ----- ------ R1 R2 R3 ---- ----- ------ | | | | | | ------------------------------- ETH1 ETH2 ETH3 ETH0 ETH4 -------------> DMZ ------------------------------ | |

I have CentOS 4 running on an old (early model) p3 with 64 MB RAM. It is acting as a router and firewall for my LAN. CentOS is doing a really good job with Shorewall + DHCPd - on a 10 Mbps cable modem, I see ~ 9.7 Mbps of throughput even when numerous tcp streams to different LAN hosts are running. I would like to add a virtual interface to one of my LAN interfaces. My LAN interface

Hi, Thank you Guus, I think the /16 solution is the easier to apply so I modified my tinc-up in host A to be like #!/bin/sh ifconfig $INTERFACE 192.168.10.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 a route -a from HOST A shows: Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 0.0.0.0 178.62.128.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 10.129.0.0