similar to: FW: tinc Digest, Vol 90, Issue 17

Dear Sir, Any network management function is available on tinc vpn? Such as, how can I check it out how many VPN nodes is connected now? Regards,Eric P Please consider your environmental responsibility. Before printing this e-mail message, ask yourself whether you really need a hard copy. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, Something strange is happening at my place: I have lots of packet loss in my tinc vpn. Network layout: laptop --- wifi --- other pc ping from laptop to other pc OUTSIDE tinc: 0% packet loss ping from laptop to other pc VIA tinc: 50% packet loss What could be the cause of that? Folkert van Heusden -- Always wondered what the latency of your webserver is? Or how much more latency you

Hello list, I use tinc with QOS, and since some weeks I got problem with tunnel disconnection because the default "Pingtimeout" of 5 sec is reach. I think it happens because of the QOS shappe the tinc traffic (data here) to let some BP for VOIP, but whate is very strange is that the ICMP protocol is not include in the shapping, so tinc would never 'see' latency on the link,

Hello all, It would be a great feature if QOS could be implemented in Tinc. It's not to do any sort of comparison, but with OpenVPN, the traffic can be shapped. In the way that tinc works as mesh VPN, the great feature would be to fix a shapping value on each nodes, known and respected by each others. (like MPLS does) As an exemple, you've got 3 nodes A,B and C, you want Tinc flows on A

Hello, I just read this document, especially the section about Tinc : http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/linux_vpn.txt It's an old one, but i would like to know the state of the Tinc security level for now. I don't scared about possible security weakness of Tinc because i only use it over our internal operator network (MPLS), but maybe one day will come the need to connect a

Hi, I have a routing problem. When i start tinc it creates the following route in the main routing table. 192.168.2.0/24 dev nb003004 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.8 The problem is that i want to use extra routing tables for each tinc vpn. When i set the netmask for the tinc device to 255.255.255.255. The route is not created, how can i add it to a another route table. Setting a

Hello, I have removed a nod from my tinc network, but his informations (owned subnet and ip address) are still present in the internal routing table. I think that even if the node is not reachable anymore (his ip is, but not the tinc daemon on it), his routing information "lives" beetween nodes. Is this possible or do i need to sleep a bit !? ;-) Do i need to stop all nodes, then

Hello, Our Asterisk runs with multiple remote sites (12 over an MPLS network), everything works fine except for the last site we have juste installed. When VOIP flows comes/goes from/to this site, there are sound quality issues, persistent, 100% reproducible, on every call. This is not a bandwidth or latency or jitter problem, everything is fine on the network. Our MPLS provider does all check

Hello, I am playing around with the bitrot feature and have some questions: 1. when a file is created, the "trusted.bit-rot.signature? attribute seems only created approximatively 120 seconds after its creations (the cluster is idle and there is only one file living on it). Why ? Is there a way to make this attribute generated at the same time of the file creation ? 2. corrupting a file

Hi Lars, Once I modify the firewall FORWARD rule to ACCEPT. I can ping and access my company PC at home. All traffic can pass through that. But I think it is not a good practice to change the FORWARD rule to ACCEPT. Any idea to check and just allow the tinc VPN traffic only? Instead of allow everything pass through the FORWARD rule. Regards, Eric -----Original Message----- From: Lars Kruse

Hi Cedric, Any file is picked up for signing by the bitd process after the predetermined wait of 120 seconds. This default value is captured in the volume option 'features.expiry-time' and is configurable - in your case, it can be set to 0 or 1. Point 2 is correct. A file corrupted before the bitrot signature is generated will not be successfully detected by the scrubber. That would

Hi Sweta, Thanks, this drive me some more questions: 1. What is the reason of delaying signature creation ? 2. As a same file (replicated or dispersed) having different signature thought bricks is by definition an error, it would be good to triggered it during a scrub, or with a different tool. Is something like this planned ? Cheers ? C?dric Lemarchand > On 18 Apr 2018, at 07:53, Sweta

Dear Lance, It is not work. Any idea? Regards, Eric -----Original Message----- From: Lance Fredrickson [mailto:lancethepants at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 12:53 AM To: tinc at tinc-vpn.org Subject: Re: Tinc Router Mode - PING RESULT is destination host unreachable On 2/16/2016 9:04 AM, Eric Yau wrote: > Hi Lars, > > Once I modify the firewall FORWARD rule to

Hello, It seems there is some rights problem with https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/nfs-ganesha/rsa.pub <https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/nfs-ganesha/rsa.pub> : wget -O /dev/null https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/nfs-ganesha/rsa.pub <https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/nfs-ganesha/rsa.pub> --2017-01-23 19:28:47--

Hi all, I use tinc since 2 years between my MPLS sites in router mode, works like a charm. Today i am trying to make an ethernet bridge beetween 2 sites for video conference needs, the raison is that 1 side is behind nat, and i dont have access on the gate, other side is on public range. Because off H323 that doesn't handle unconfigured NAT, i would like to give a public IP to the video

Is there any way to request WEBrick to shutdown besides hitting CTRL-C at the console? I''m looking for, perhaps, a script/shutdown command, or perhaps a special URL that will request WEBrick to die. It can be a command run in a different shell, or, as I said, a special URL. Anyone? Tom Harris Cisco Systems -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, If your cluster's virtual IP is using ip aliasing (eg eth0:0), i think your problem come from UDP flows, they are, in opposition to TCP flows, unconnected, so the IP stack take the shortest route/interface to send them, wich is when this is the default route, the real interface and not the aliased. For exemple if you have eth0 the real, eth0:0 the virtual, you can try to add in your

Hi All, I am trying to setup the site-to-site VPN with TINC for connect my home network to company network. Here is the IP allocation and configuration for your reference. Home PC (192.168.1.2) ?-----? Home (OPENWRT Router, 192.168.1.1, 10.0.0.1) ?----------------? INTERNET ?-------------? COMPANY (Windows 7 PC,192.168.2.1, 10.0.0.2) ?------------? COMPANY (SERVER ZONE) ?----? SERVER A

Dear All, I just tried to use 8192bit keypair for Tinc VPN connection. The connection is unable to build up. After reduce the bit of keypair from 8192bit to 4096bit. Everything is resumed to normal. How large of public/private RSA keypair can support for TINC VPN 1.0.22 on Windows platform? Regards, ERIC P Please consider your environmental responsibility. Before printing this e-mail

Hi, I upgraded some of my Tinc nodes from 1.0.8 recently and found something strange. All of a sudden, the vpn would not work as a full-mesh. Certain nodes were not contactable. I re-generated my rsa-keys, and checked my configuration. My vpn uses the following in tinc.conf, as I am routing both ipv4 and v6. === name = node1 mode = switch AddressFamily = any PMTU = 1280 PMTUDiscovery = yes