similar to: FW: 2 tinc questions

Tinc looks like a wonderful VPN tool, potentially a great alternative to the zero-configuration Hamachi and similar services. Tunngle, NeoRouter, Remobo and Comodo EasyVPN are also in the zero-configuration LAN VPN category. But none come close to the freedom, flexibility and security of Tinc. If only Tinc had a GUI or even a command line configuration tool to generate and manage the Tinc

Hi all, I'm using trunk version of LLVM/CLANG. When I compile attached files on my 64-bit Ubuntu 10.04 LTS system as follows: clang -O2 -g check.c main.c -o check64 When I do gdb check64 and set a breakpoint to the check routine and executes to the breakpoint, I've got: Breakpoint 1, check (result=0x601110, expect=0x601020, n=53) at check.c:7 7 { As you can see I can inspect

I have attached a case of what I am trying to do, I'm pretty sure I'm just missing some simple API call. In the cfg you can see that although Im setting "lsr.iv441" as "lsr.iv44" from for.body.387.i it's not propagating that through the block or graph. On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > I am splitting a one BB

I am splitting a one BB loop into two BB. Basically, the one loop BB has 3 incoming values, one form back edge two from other edges. I want to extract the PHIs from the other two edges out into it's own BB and delete that from the loop, then redirect the backedge to the loopbody (non extracted portion) and create a new PHI coming from the extracted BB and the backedge. I can do this;

Hi all, Following command was working for me before: svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk llvm Now it fails as follows: svn: Server sent unexpected return value (500 Internal Server Error) in response to OPTIONS request for 'http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk ' Any idea ? Best Regards Seb -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Hi James, clang is able to generate correct debug informations for 64-bit target at -O2. My feeling, given some other experiments I've done, is that debug information generated for x86 32-bit might be broken for parameters as long as they are not 'homed' in the code (local copy to an automatic variable). It seems that when llvm.declare is turned into a llvm.value for parameter there

Also, Jerry Solinas, the person listed as an author of the curves, also is the author of DUAL_EC_DRBG. On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:43 AM, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2018, Damien Miller wrote: > >> We're aware of those arguments but don't find them convincing enough to >> switch early. > > (but we will be switching to ssh-ed25519

Is there any way to do this? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20120307/77764e4b/attachment.htm>

> I don't think that a patch implementing any of those approaches would be > accepted, that's why I am tending towards implementing it outside of LLVM. Why not? If they make LLVM better and aren't hacks, why wouldn't they be accepted? ________________________________________ From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Clemens Hammacher

On 3/6/12 5:28 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > Advantage of using the latest address: one saved jmp per call. Per newly JITted call ;) > Advantage of using the initial address: easier G/C of intermediate > versions, less things to keep track of. I still think both versions require larger changes. When using the latest address, you have to keep track of all JITted functions per

On 3/6/12 6:48 PM, James Molloy wrote: >> I don't think that a patch implementing any of those approaches would be >> accepted, that's why I am tending towards implementing it outside of LLVM. > > Why not? If they make LLVM better and aren't hacks, why wouldn't they be accepted? Okay, that motivated me to work on the patch again. I think I found a compromise of

Hi all, llvm-mc has a -version option, but it doesn't print all registered targets like llc. Attached is the patch to fix that! Thanks, Joey -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120307/2c9e281d/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed...

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20120307/d7f0b110/attachment-0007.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL:

Hello All, I'm deploying NUT in a data center and I'm curious to know how others have gone about staging the shutdown of various systems. The systems are broken down into groups of importance, group1 being the most important group4 being the least. In the event of an outage take down group4 after 5 minutes, group3 after 10 minutes, group2 after 15, and finally group4 after 20. I've

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > > The LLVM GCC merge patch file is available here: > > > > http://nondot.org/~void/llvm-r139307-r142930.diff.gz > > > > Share and enjoy! > > On x86-linux: > > ../../gcc-4.2.llvm.master/gcc/config/i386/i386.c: In function 'output_pic_addr_const': >

On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 08:39 -0500, asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com wrote: > Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 12:02:53 -0600 > From: Stephen Bosch <posting at vodacomm.ca> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Mushtaq Ahmed is out of the office. > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> > Message-ID:

I have a set of changes that enhances rematerialization to handle more kinds of loads, specifically loads with multiple address registers. This is a big win for some codes on x86. I plan to send these up ASAP but I want to solicit a bit of guidance first. The change requires that live interval analysis be able to determine whether and instruction is a load and whether an instruction writes to

How do we allow resource over provisioning in KVM ? I have already posted the same question twice but haven't got any response yet, sorry for repeating it again but its important for me, so if some one could please point me in the right direction. -- Jatin On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:58 PM, <libvirt-users-request at redhat.com> wrote: > Send libvirt-users mailing list submissions to

Hi, all! I sucessfully install NUT by source, but it could not recognize my UPS device My UPS device is APC Smart-UPS 750VA USB & Serial 230V for China. Pruduct introduction: http://www.apc.com/products/resource/include/techspec_index.cfm?base_sku=SUA750ICH The page is in Chinese. It may be similar with this one:

Hi, I know this is know thing about the java windows being blank. I also kinda guess that it is not a priority to get it fixed to a lot of you ppl. So, I'm here to help! :) It's really pain to be using Xnest and all those to work with java-swing development, and I'd like to see this fixed. There was nothing of this in the archives, so whats the plan? Anybody working on