similar to: [713] trunk/wxruby2: Patch for rake install, added rake uninstall

Hey Guys, Found a small bug in rake/rakewx.rb while trying to compile wxGTK and wxRuby2 from SVN. I''ve commited the patch to the file, which changes the following: Index: rake/rakewx.rb =================================================================== --- rake/rakewx.rb (revision 1451) +++ rake/rakewx.rb (working copy) @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ force_mkdir File.join(dest_dir,

I am trying to build wxruby from source, but I have encounter an error. For some reason the ''rake'' command fail when it tries to link lib/wxruby2.so because it is missing missing -lruby18 resulting in errors like wx.cpp:(.text+0x1618): undefined reference to `rb_intern'' wx.cpp:(.text+0x165c): undefined reference to `rb_eNotImpError'' wx.cpp:(.text+0x1666):

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5802 Summary: misleading error message in atomic rsync Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: normalperson@yhbt.net

Hi guys, samba client version 3.0.5, server version 3.0.5, kernel 2.4.26. Relevant configs on server: unix extensions = Yes wide links = Yes follow symlinks = Yes On client computer with home user mounted via smbfs I'm trying this: D102-054 [/lp/home/dito/tmp] > cd /tmp D102-054 [/tmp] > mkdir dest_dir D102-054 [/tmp] > cd - D102-054 [/lp/home/dito/tmp] > ln -s /tmp/dest_dir

?s 23:06 de 25/07/2023, Bob Green escreveu: > Hello, > > I am seeking advice as to how I can download the 833 files from this > site:"http://home.brisnet.org.au/~bgreen/Data/" > > I want to be able to download them to perform a textual analysis. > > If the 833 files, which are in a Directory with two subfolders were on > my computer I could read them

I realize batch mode is still experimental, but I was hoping there might be a workaround for a problem I am getting. I have been trying to run some tests and I get the below error when I use the --read-batch option to. I can successfully create an initial set of batch files, then a second set based upon a few modified test files from the first batch. When I first run the --read-batch option

--- configure.ac | 4 +++- ruby/Makefile.am | 11 ++++++----- ruby/Rakefile.in | 2 +- ruby/run-bindtests | 2 +- ruby/run-ruby-tests | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index ea0aec4..130db51 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -769,8 +769,10 @@ AC_ARG_ENABLE([ruby],

--- configure.ac | 15 +++++++++++++-- generator/generator.ml | 12 ++++++++++-- ruby/Makefile.am | 11 ++++++----- ruby/Rakefile.in | 2 +- ruby/run-ruby-tests | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 8651c7b..33c09db 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -312,8 +312,19 @@

Hello I can''t manage to install VB on osx via puppet and pkgdmg provider. puppet client : 2.6.8 on osx snow leopard 10.6.7 puppetmaster : 2.6.8-1~bpo60+1 on debian squeeze The puppet logs say : [...] debug: Puppet::Type::Package::ProviderPkgdmg: Executing ''/usr/bin/curl -o /tmp/VirtualBox-4.0.8-71778-OSX.dmg -C - -k -s --url

(This is the same change as 87c9ec881cb695724e01d9f6fc9df996d4c67cb6 in libguestfs.) --- ruby/Makefile.am | 16 ++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/ruby/Makefile.am b/ruby/Makefile.am index e78ab59..7a5fe42 100644 --- a/ruby/Makefile.am +++ b/ruby/Makefile.am @@ -45,13 +45,17 @@ all: $(RAKE) build $(RAKE) rdoc -RUBY_SITELIB := $(shell $(RUBY)

Hi there, One of the things that I've been doing for fun is to try to speed up ext4's fsck time. As you can see here: http://thunk.org/tytso/blog/2008/08/08/fast-ext4-fsck-times/ Fsck'ing an ext4 filesystem can be between 6-8 times after than the equivalent file hierarchy on ext4. In order to speed it up further, the main place to look is in pass #2, where the directory is

I have a script which copies files from remote server to local filesystem and processes them locally. Files on remote server are cleaned periodically so that every once in a while the remote directory is empty just after old files are removed. If I run my script it fails with error mentioned below. The ugly workaround I use is to 'touch foo' on remote server so that there's *anything*

All, I have an rsync based backup process which uses rsyncd on the source, to backup to a directory on the client. I have rsync version 3.1.2 on the client and 2.6.8 on the source host (daemon). The rysnc command I use is; /usr/bin/rsync -aHzS --partial --numeric-ids --delete --timeout=3600 \ --contimeout=180 \ --exclude-from=/path/to/excludelist \

Hi I would like to ask, when the "vanished files" warning is a sign that something bad is happening somewhere. I know that the `rsync-no-vanished` script can silence the warning, but I am wondering whether this is a sane thing to do. My guess based on https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653#c26 and https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10356 is that it's fine, but

Hi all, I'm running rsync version 2.6.3 protocol version 28 on Solaris 8 and am having a problem. We have some scripts that wrap around rsync and generate a list of files to transfer from the sending system (regardless of whether that directory exists on the receiver). I was expecting rsync to fail when transferring files with a path that doesn't exist on the receiver (in fact

All it means is that rsync saw a file that needed transferring but the file was gone when rsync actually tried to open it. So look at the filenames and decide if it is a problem or not. On 09/07/2017 10:27 AM, Vangelis Katsikaros via rsync wrote: > Hi > > I would like to ask, when the "vanished files" warning is a sign that something bad is happening somewhere. I know that

This is odd: We're using rsync to mirror multiple directories from a server to two clients. The server is running Tru64 v5.1a, client A is running Redhat Linux 8.0, and client B is running Tru64 v4.0g. The mirrors for both clients are running at the same time interval (10 minutes, offset by 5 minutes). All machines are running rsync v2.5.6, and using ssh2 v3.2.3 as the

PuppetDB 0.11.0 is the fifth beta release on the road to 1.0. Changes include new features and bug fixes. For details on changes in this release, please see the release notes below. Please note that upgrading may take longer than in previous releases, due to new indices being added to the database. In our upgrades with large datasets (~2300 nodes, 900k resources) we didn''t see upgrade

I'm just doing a local copy: rsync -avp --progress <source_dir> <dest_dir> The source and dest are on different spindles. Some of my copies are a TB or more (I just started one that is 1.5 TB). It is my assumption (possibly faulty) that rsync is more robust for handling any aborted copies that have to get restarted after the copy failed, thus my preference for rsync. 3

Hi, Ben Skeggs latest changes in Mesa cause a build failure (libdrm is latest git ...). Thanks. Johannes gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/Mesa/src/mesa/drivers' gmake[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/Mesa/src/mesa/drivers/dri' sed -e 's, at INSTALL_DIR@,/usr,' -e 's, at INSTALL_LIB_DIR@,/usr/lib,' -e 's, at