similar to: 2nd tunnel on macosx

Hi, I have macosx 10.5.8 and Tunnelblick (openvpn) installed before. I have installed tinc using port and got version 1.0.11 (Jun 29 2010 15:10:51) now I have 2 problems: 1) the interface variable from the tinc.conf is not used, instead I have a tun0 interface (or tap0). 2) the tinc-up script seems to be fired too early as I get an error: ifconfig: interface /dev/tap0 does not exist when I run

Hi, I have a tinc tunnel up and running. I connected 2 hosts with a net behind. Host A with static ip 1.2.3.4 with 192.168.1.0/24 Host B with dhcp connection with 192.168.2.0/24 the whole net is 192.168.0.0/16 I can reach at any time any host behind A from a host behind B. But I can reach a host behind B only, if traffic (keep alive like ping) from B goes continousliy from B to A. I am running

Hi, thanks. Sorry for the mess with my gmail account... This made the route go away. But is this the right way to configure tinc? To give the tinc interface an IP (with 255.255.255.255 subnetmask) from the local (green) network it does route the traffic to? Does it make sense to give the tinc interface an 192.168.0.253 IP, when the net here is 192.168.0.0/24 on eth1 I can not find such a

Hi, here [1] is stated, that there is experimental support for ios. Is there somewhere a howto? Could not find one in the source... Is it only possible with a jail-broken device or even with a valid developer account? [1] http://www.tinc-vpn.org/platforms/ regards Henrik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Tinc Mailing-Group, Having set up the kernel correctly, and got tinc running successfully, I am now trying to get two VPNs running at once. Hence I need to have two ethertap devices ( /dev/tap0 and /dev/tap1 ). The first tap0 device was created thus: mknod -m 600 /dev/tap0 c 36 16 chown 0.0 /dev/tap0 The second tap1 device was created too: mknod -m 600 /dev/tap1 c 36 17 chown 0.0 /dev/tap1

Dear Tinc Experts, I have been struggling for some time now, with Tinc pre3, and firewall rulesets and routing. I did once manage to get Tinc to work okay in a test-bed environment. I then tried to set it up for a 'real-life' setup and cannot get it to work properly. My real-life setup looks like this: Network A: 192.168.1.0 / 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.7 tap1 device gateway >

Hello list, Please don''t shoot me. I know I''m doing something with bonding that bonding wasn''t made for. I just want to give it a try. I want a simple mechanism to have a failover on a 24Mbit line to a 2Mbit line in case the 24Mbit line goes down. Between A and B there are two lines: a 24Mbit and a 2Mbit. I use two OpenVPN tunnels with tap devices: +-- tap0 (A)---

Hello. I am trying to get multi paths running, i.e I want to specify 2 paths from a particular node to another. To test this, I am setting up the following scenario: I create 2 tap devices tap0 = 10.1.1.1/32 netmask 255.255.255.0 tap1 = 10.2.2.2/32 netmask 255.255.255.0 I then issue the route command: ip route add 10.3.3.3/32 nexthop via 10.1.1.2 nexthop via 10.2.2.3 The route table

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

On 2023-05-20 1:43 a.m., Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On 20/05/2023 04:44, Steven Monai via samba wrote: >> I found an open bug in bugzilla that reports a very similar assertion >> failure: "Bug 14030 - named crashes on DLZ zone update" >> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14030). Any chance this >> Bug is related to what I'm seeing? >

Hi, I have some questions about running multiple tinc deamons. The docs say you can do it to support separate VPNs, but I don't see any examples. I have been running a single tinc vpn for months with no problems, now I'm trying to add a second separate vpn. I'm running the static tinc version 1.0pre7 (built Apr 9 2002 14:00:34, protocol 14) on Debian potato. I did not want to go

Hi there, I have machine running: Linux 2.2.20 Samba version 3.0.14a (debian package) Check the end of the email for the samba config file The samba machine is sharing a directory and it is validating users through a windows 2k PDC. Everything works if I use windows/linux clients, but when I try to use a share directory from a macosx client (10.4.4) using the finder (GUI), it doesn't work.

Note: This is somewhat related to Wine as fullscreen window support for X11 does not exist, at present, in the base X11 code. Many folks have posted threads asking why this is not so. Bottom line: Without good xrandr support, there will NEVER be true fullscreen support nor the ability to open X11 sessions with sized windows without using the virtual desktop. This is sorely needed and

This setup is rather complex, so apologies for the length of this mail. I'm also not at all sure where my problem is, so again I apologise if this is the wrong place to ask. I have a raspberry pi sitting in a remote office (hostname 'pi' below), a VPS hosted on someone's cloud (hostname 'vps' below) and my local laptop (hostname 'laptop'). The remote office then

Hi, it seems that ipconfig has a problem if multiple devices are up and connected to the same network. It seems that it uses the wrong socket/device index to compare it to incoming packet. To be more precise, the packet gets discarded in do_pkt_recv as the ifindex from state differs always from the incoming packet To reproduce create two tap devices: $ sudo tunctl -u uli -t tap0

I have the following situation: A Linux 2.4.22 server: Physical ethernet: lan1 - Ethernet port (Internet) lan2 - Ethernet port (Cisco Switch, Trunk port) Tunnel: tap1 - OpenVPN in tcp-server mode VLAN's: lan2.201 lan2.202 lan2.203 tap1.201 tap1.202 tap1.203 Bridges: br201 (lan2.201, tap1.201) br202 (lan2.202, tap1.202) br203 (lan2.203, tap1.203) On the other end, the same type of server:

Hi all. I would need to use a single physical interface on a Linux box to manage two different IP addresses (belonging to two separate logical subnets) with two different MAC address. (I need to emulate te presence of two separate physical interfaceses for a PC on the same LAN, at layer 2 and layer 3). Is it possible to use the linux ethernet bridging code and two tap interfaces for this

Hello, It seems currently when you "yum update" CentOS 6.6 Xen host you end up getting python-virtinst from c6 base repo: python-virtinst-0.600.0-24.el6.noarch and not from Xen4CentOS repo, because the version there is "older": 0.600.0-19. .. which means the centos/xen-specific patch in python-virtinst is "lost". (default to tap2 instead of tap1, to make blktap2

There has been numerous threads etc regarding this but all that has left me is more than a little confused :-(. I have setup and environment consisting of two OpenVPN tunnels and wish to load balance at the packet level between them. I am currently running on Linux edm 2.4.21-20.EL.c0custom #2 Tue Oct 12 08:52:23 BST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux And have install Quagga at each end to provide

Folks, We have a setup where each mobile node connects with 1 or more tinc instances (over different links) to a central node. tinc is running in switch mode. The link is chosen by setting the IP address on the active link's interface, and the central node sees this after the first packet on the link, and moves the MAC address to a different 'ethernet port' (link). This works really