similar to: Routing issue

Hello, Since the present tinc documentation is not very clear about this, please explain the following: is it mandatory to include the local IP address classes in the global VPN address class? Namely, please consider the following setup (which works great in practice): 1. A tinc VPN, full mesh, with n nodes (n > 3) 2. tinc runs on the firewall, which is also the default gateway for each

Hi Everyone, I have a routing situation where Tinc looks like it could come in extremely useful, but I have a query I hope someone can cast an eye on, as I'm unsure whether Tinc can help me here. I currently have a Quagga OSPF linux router which connects LAN A to LAN B over the quickest available of two routes (both routes at both ends connect to Quagga boxes to prevent collisions). One of

Hello, Please tell me if it's possible to use tinc together with OSPF (instead of static routes in LAN). By OSPF I mean Quagga's GNU/Linux daemon. Namely, I have a group of LANs (private 192.168.x.0/24 each). Each LAN has a GNU/Linux default gateway, 192.168.x.1, that also connects to the Internet via a public IP address (does NAT and firewall for the LAN "behind" it). tinc

Hi Everyone; Please find below a mail I sent to quagga mailing list, covering lartc/quagga issue. So far, I have no reply from them. I think that maybe you guys would have an idea about this. Thanks in advance ! Best, -----Forwarded Message----- Hi There, I''m new to quagga and to dynamic routing in general, so please forgive me if my question are foobar. I''m trying to

My setup: LAN A | |-- Wireless-r1 --| |-- Wireless-r2 --| ..................| .................LAN B LAN A is my primary (external) LAN. LAN B is my wireless LAN. LAN A does iBGP and OSPF routing. Each wireless router does the following: 2 Bridged Ethernet + STP connections to LAN A 2 Bridged Ethernet + STP connections to LAN B 2 VLANs on LAN A 5 VLANs on LAN B UCARP on each wireless

We''re trying to figure out how to have equal cost multipath routing using OSPF (quagga) and have come up with the following... Has anyone done something similar? -- How do you deal with incoming services (mail/web/etc) in such a scenario as below - And does anyone have any suggestions? There''s more detail below.... Diagram and overview: Network A connects to Core1 and Core2

http://www.open-mesh.org/ Idea #1: is BATMAN worth considering using as part of the layer 2 routing in Tinc? Idea #2: would it be possible to embed BATMAN as an option to avoid having to use Quagga for routing v6 subnets? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I'm reading the tinc documentation [1], chapter 4 Configuration. I notice an apparent contradiction, and I wonder which part is correct. [1] http://tinc-vpn.org/documentation/tinc_4.html In part 4.3 "How connections work" this is stated: "If it [tinc] sees one or more ?ConnectTo? values pointing to other tinc daemons in that file, it will try to connect to those other

Dear Guys and Girls, I have two group of tinc nodes, say A and B. The network quality between A and B is unstable. I am wondering what algorithm tinc is using for delivering and relaying packets. How does one tinc node decide which the "next hop" is when its destination can not be reached directly or too slow to reach directly? The real situation is like this, nodes in group A and B

Dear all, I am trying to configure a basic TINC vpn between two sites using OpenWRT routers. The link seems to work, the ping between the two routers is ok, but I can't ping hosts between the subnets behind the routers. This is the configuration: ======== SITE 1 (CLIENT) - polimnia (subnet 192.168.4.0/24, gw 192.168.4.1) tinc.conf ------------- Name = polimnia ConnectTo = calliope

Hi all, So, I've deployed Tinc in a non normal manor to which has been working just fine for days up until recent. Here is a description of the network. There are two VPN host controllers, A and B. All nodes have a separate connection to A and B. Tinc has been configured to be in 'switch' mode for both the A cloud and B cloud. On the back end, I have OSPF running on all nodes and

On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, David Summers wrote: > Thanks for the great software package! The question I have is this: Thank you :) > My goal is to set up a triangle topology VPN between three sites and run > OSPF routing on all the sites so that if a link goes down between any two > sites the OSPF routing will reroute the packets that used to go between > the sites A <-> B to A

I have done it... added on both routers a new firewall zone covering the tinc interface, policy in accept, out accept, fwd accept, interzone forwarding from/to LAN.... when I do it, I am not even able to ping the routers between them, even though the PING PONG is ok in the tinc debug.... 2018-05-24 20:28 GMT+02:00 Naemr . <naemrr at gmail.com>: > did you add a forwarding allow rule from

Hi, Are there init-scripts available for tinc? Kind regards, Erik.

I have a three tinc server setup, similar to "4.3 How Connections Work" using the configuration mostly likehttp://ostolc.org/site-to-site-vpn-with-tinc.html The clients (Ubuntus, Debians and Windows 10s) can all ping (and SSH) to each other remotely. As far as that is concerned it's working great - thanks so much for some great software. However, on each of the Tinc servers (A and

What challenge this would solve ? VPN software in general tries to be another router when running in server mode with multiple clients. This restricts VPN customers from having complex topology. For instance, I'd like to have two tunnels between each client network and each server (with two broadband connections on each end), with some OSPF running and automatically switching from one to

I see what you want me to do. But it does incur an extra MAC layer header to each VPN packet, more fragmentation. And broadcasts leak to all peers. It sure saves you from doing any improvements, but there are side effects that are undesirable to many customers. This is specially a problem if I want two VPN connections between two sites using redundant connections, we get an instant L2 loop. With

Hello all, Some time before Christmas, a project was started. The task was to enhance an existing LiveCD solution with User-mode Linux. A number of requirements was stated, where the greatest challenge was to fit 10 virtual routers within an old no-name PC with only 256MB Ram. And the solution must still be run from a LiveCD. Thanks to Xen, the task was possible to complete. -But, what does it

Hi, I've been struggling for almost a week now, but I can't get the following setup to work. At home I have class A network: 10.0.0.0/16 with a masquerading gateway 10.0.0.1 running tinc. At work (http://www.eastsite.nl) we have a 192.168.0.0/24 network. The gateway is called 'ed' I've set up tinc on 'gateway' and everything is working fine from

Hi all, I am using a redhat 8.x linux box configured with zebra routing software which is also configured with ospfd I have 2 backbone routers running ospf connected to different isp''s I have 3 local routers also running ospf within themselfs and also with the 2 backbone routers (all are linux boxes) router A - backbone router 1 router B - backbone router 2 router C - local router 1