similar to: Performance problems on solaris x86

Two hosts, A and B. igb0 on A connects to e1000g1 on B. host A # dladm show-link LINK CLASS MTU STATE BRIDGE OVER igb0 phys 1500 unknown -- -- e1000g0 phys 1500 up -- -- e1000g1 phys 1500 up -- -- igb1 phys 1500 up -- -- e1000g1vnic1 vnic 1500 up -- e1000g1

Hi, I try to start Solaris10 HVM DomU on SNV_93 dom0 running amd athlon x2 and 8gb ram. When I try to create a domU i get: bash-3.2# virt-install -n sol10 --hvm -r 1024 --vnc -f /dev/zvol/dsk/rpool/sol10 -c /rpool/pub/sol-10-u5-ga-x86-dvd.iso Starting install... virDomainCreateLinux() failed POST operation failed: (xend.err ''Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Backend device not

Hi, I have a problem similar to the previous poster (thread: Virtual network of DomU''s), but apparently not with similar solutions... Situation: - two physical links aggregated to "default0" - dladm create-vlan on default0 with several different vlans - xVM DomU running linux connected to the same vlans when trying to ping the DomU from Dom0, I can see with snoop (in Dom0)

Hello, I have wrote some scripts to shape about 1000 workstations. My config: Pentium IV - 2GHz, 1Gb RAM, RedHat Enterprise Advanced Server 3, kernel 2.4.21-9.EL, iproute-2.4.7-11.30E.1 2 Gigabit Lan cards in bridge mode. I use htb. Everything work fine, but I have troubles with showing running configuration. # Init shaper root for dev eth0 tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 2: htb default 200

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Not strictly Asterisk related, but I'm trying to get an AVM Fritz! card to work with Asterisk on a Fedora Core 3 box. I've grabbed the official AVM Fritz CAPI driver from the AVM website and compiled against the current kernel. However, as soon as I modprobe it I get: CAPI Subsystem Rev 1.1.2.8 fcpci: module license 'Proprietary'

Has anyone gotten a transparent firewall working? I''m using snv_125 on an IBM x346 (snv_130 goes into endless boot loops on this hardware). I can create a working bridge with dladm, but can''t stop packets, even with "block in quick all". That stops packets on my management interface bge0, but not on the bridge. :( tim at ghost:~# ifconfig -a lo0:

Folks, I''m playing with maxbw on links (as opposed to flows) in Crossbow, and I have a couple of questions. First, the limts seem only advisory. The first example has the main host talking to a zone that has 172.16.17.100 configured on znic0. When there is no maxbw, the throughtput is as expected; when maxbw is 55M the throughput only drops to 76 Mbps: # netperf -H

What is the HEX code for "transparent" color? I've tried "00000000" "FFFFFF00" "FFFFFFFF", but they don't work. Thanks [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi! Short time ago our Samba-Server crashed during normal use with low load. (Ping was working, but no login was possible (didn't ask for password on the terminal)). Perhaps it is a bug, or perhaps it is a problem with my machine and you can help me. I am running: SuSE Linux 6.4 Samba Version 2.0.6 (smbd) Kernel: 2.2.14 (original SuSE-Kernel) Some Logfiles: /var/log/warn ... Aug 16

I gave tinc1.0pre3 a test after the modifications you have done today. It insists that it is still 1.0pre2 but this is due to the fact the you used "1" as tag for configure.in rather than "CABAL". Anyway - results were not much more successful than yesterday: *** SERVER side log file from startup until sone seconds after connection was established *** Jun 25 21:14:30 lemon

htb was used to control traffic stuctrul is like that(default is 1:20): |----1:100 |------1:10| 1:1| |____1:110 | |------1:20 #AC="tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1" #$AC u32 match u32 0xac100b00 ffffff00 at 16 flowid 1:10 #$AC u32 match u32 0xac100b01 ffffffff at 16 flowid 1:100 I copy a file to 172.16.11.1 class 1:100 go into

You need a "#" at the beginning of the string to specify that it is a hex code for the color. Try "#00000000". On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 9:07?AM Yosu Yurramendi <yosu.yurramendi at gmail.com> wrote: > > What is the HEX code for "transparent" color? > I've tried "00000000" "FFFFFF00" "FFFFFFFF", but they don't work.

On 2024-06-06 4:37 a.m., Yosu Yurramendi wrote: > What is the HEX code for "transparent" color? > I've tried "00000000" "FFFFFF00" "FFFFFFFF", but they don't work. If the other answers don't solve your problem, you should give us some context. Not all graphics functions in R can handle transparency, so please show us some reproducible

> - Indirectdata finally REALLY REALLY works now! > - More precise debug messages Hmmm ... I can't prove that using the CVS code I checked out this morning. Everything works like yesterday: I can ping the peer but I canot go beyond: *** SERVER *** Jun 27 09:04:56 lemon tinc.9[10186]: tincd 1.0pre3 (Jun 27 2000 08:53:56) startin g, debug level 4 Jun 27 09:04:56 lemon tinc.9[10186]:

Hi, I''m afraid I have some problems understanding how crossbow is supposed to work ;) On my machine (OpenSolaris, snv_111) I''m running VirtualBox with couple of linux / XP installation and additionally a zone with exclusive IP. My network configuration looks like this: [6]elsinore:~>dladm show-link LINK CLASS MTU STATE OVER bge0 phys 1500 up

Hi, I've downloaded the samba 3.6.12 OpenCSW package. I joined openindiana to the the active directory, winbind seems to work fine, I see all the users with "wbinfo -u". However, my samba server is not starting. It seems that there is no network card found. 2013/03/06 10:40:39.068405, 0] lib/interface.c:543(load_interfaces) WARNING: no network interfaces found [2013/03/06

Sorry for all the questions I''m just trying to understand how it all works. Thank you for your time. Is the following configuration possible? where ht 800 links to 3: for the 3rd Octet in the IP and then 3: links to 4: for the fourth Octet? tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 10 handle 3: protocol ip u32 divisor 256 tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 10 u32 ht 800::

Hello all, I have a very simple configuration and I just can''t figure out why the marking is not being done. I want to have all packets from 10.0.0.0/24 to 20.0.0.1 marked as EF traffic. What could be wrong? Any help or ideas would be really appreciated. Thanks, Mario. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- ./tc qdisc

My Polycom IP301 hangs on "Processing Cfg..." Here is the boot log: 0930155446|so |4|00|---------- Initial log entry ---------- 0930155446|so |4|00|+++ Note that bootrom log times are in GMT +++ 0930155446|wdog |4|00|Initial log entry 0930155446|cfg |4|00|Initial log entry 0930155446|copy |4|00|Initial log entry 0930155446|cdp |4|00|Initial log entry 0930155446|cdp

I have the following in extentions.conf: exten => 2111,1,Dial(SIP/2111 at gw1.langley) exten => 2111,2,Voicemail(u2111) exten => 2111,3,Hangup exten => 2111,100,Voicemail(b2111) exten => 2111,101,Hangup I have the following in sip.conf: ; Cisco 1750 [gw1.langley] type=friend host=172.16.17.1 context=default canreinvite=no Like the ATA, lots of stuff doesn't work on the 1750