Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "tinc SECURITY INFORMATION - Unauthorized access to VPN"
2000 Jun 11
3
TINC 1.0pre2 problem
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, David Summers wrote:
> Thanks for the great software package! The question I have is this:
Thank you :)
> My goal is to set up a triangle topology VPN between three sites and run
> OSPF routing on all the sites so that if a link goes down between any two
> sites the OSPF routing will reroute the packets that used to go between
> the sites A <-> B to A
2000 Mar 25
3
RFH -> Request for Help.
Hello all,
I've been playing with tinc to setup a wan between two offices of the
company that I work for. I'm partially there but having a slight problem.
tinc comes up between the 2 machines (both 2.2.14 debian woody
machines), and I can ping from the vpn machine at office a, and get a
response from office b. However, if I ping any other machine across the
wan I can't get a
2005 Sep 27
2
Tree connect failed: ERRDOS - ERRnomem
I recently couldn't connect to a windowXP domain share from a winXP
client.(Samba is the PDC) When I attempted to mount the share from the samba
server this is the error I got.
colin@Alfalfa:~/oakwood$ smbmount //buckwheat/share buckwheat/
Password:
6586: tree connect failed: ERRDOS - ERRnomem (Insufficient server memory to
perform the requested function.)
colin@Alfalfa:~/oakwood$ smbmount
2000 Jul 08
1
Problems starting up tincd with startupscript 1.0pre2-1.i386.rpm
Hello,
I'm trying to set up a vpn using tinc, so I installed tinc with the rpm version on my firewall as a listener. Setting up the tap device is no problem. The file /etc/tinc/tinc.conf looks like:
TapDevice = /dev/tap0
MyVirtualIP = 192.168.2.1/24
Vpnmask = 255.255.255.0
When I start the script /etc/rc.d/init.d/tinc start it says something about missing /etc/tinc/nets.boot
2000 Jun 27
1
[CVS] humbolt:/tinc/cabal/src net.c netutl.c protocol.c
> - Indirectdata finally REALLY REALLY works now!
> - More precise debug messages
Hmmm ... I can't prove that using the CVS code I checked out this morning.
Everything works like yesterday: I can ping the peer but I canot go beyond:
*** SERVER ***
Jun 27 09:04:56 lemon tinc.9[10186]: tincd 1.0pre3 (Jun 27 2000 08:53:56)
startin
g, debug level 4
Jun 27 09:04:56 lemon tinc.9[10186]:
2000 May 16
1
New config directive VpnMask
Hello Mads,
In case you never saw any mail from me, I'm tinc's co-author. It would be
helpful if you'd subscribe to the tinc developpers mailing list. It's not
high volume, but it eases communication.
There's a problem with tinc's boot scripts (at least the debian one, but
that's fixed now). The netmask of the tap devices should be larger than
the one specified with
2000 Oct 17
2
setup problems
Hi,
Although Im dutch too, Ill write this in english. I got a similar problem
then the one on the helpforum. Ill paste my setup first
server tincd.conf
----
ListenPort = 8089
MyOwnVPNIP = 192.168.100.1/24
#VpnMask = 255.255.255.0
TapDevice = /dev/tap0
Passphrases=/usr/local/etc/tinc/passphrases
server tapdev
----
tap0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FD:C0:A8:6F:01
inet
2000 May 24
3
Almost ...
Hi all,
I have used tinc to get a vpn up and running I am almost there but have some
problems at the end.
My config:
Building A
Network 10.0.0.0
netmask 255.255.255.0
gateway 10.0.0.30
tap0 device on gateway machine 10.0.0.31
Building B
Network 10.2.0.0
netmask 255.255.255.0
gateway 10.2.0.154
tap0 device on gateway machine 10.2.0.155
from network A I can ping 10.2.0.154 but not the other
2000 Jul 27
1
Network confusion
Whens the point and click GUI coming out?
All kidding aside, I seem to be confused about some of the network
settings. Essentially all I want is a secure tunnel from machine A to B
on two different physical networks, but I can't seem to get there.
Just to get things figured out I've got two machines on the same physical
network, mach A: 192.168.0.1, mach B: 192.168.0.3. bcast is
2001 Jun 22
1
book on tinc
Hi Ivo and Guus,
We are writing a book on building VPNs for Linux and a part of it describes
tinc. I wanted to make sure that your opinion, as tinc authors and
developers, is reflected.
First, let me ask a couple of technical questions.
1.
If there are two hosts, foo and bar, that are to be connected via tinc, and
each host should only have _one_ IP address (i.e. nmask is /32), would the
2002 Feb 25
1
problem with tinc pre5
Hello,
I have 2 hosts HostA and HostB
HostA - 10.38.9.2, kernel 2.4.16, tincd from Debian package
HostB - 10.38.9.223, kernel 2.2.17-21mdk, tincd from tarball package.
HostA:
------------------------------
/etc/tinc/test4/tinc.conf
Name = HostA
ConnectTo = HostB
TapDevice = /dev/misc/net/tun
PrivateKeyFile = /etc/tinc/test4/rsa_key.priv
/etc/tinc/test4/hosts/HostA
Subnet = 10.0.0.0/8
Port =
2001 Jan 16
1
TINC and REDHAT
G'day,
I've just downloaded the tinc-1.0pre3 and compiled it - it seems to work
fine.
I tried your tinc start script in the redhat directory, first adding the
MyOwnVPNIP = 10.1.3.1/16
VpnMask = 255.255.0.0
to my tinc.conf file as suggested.
But now when TINC is invoked, tinc exits with the following error.
[root@platypus tinc-1.0pre3]# /usr/local/sbin/tincd -n wurley.vpn
Failed to
2000 May 24
3
FW: Almost ...
I am using tinc1.0pre1 pre2 is not yet available on the tinc site.
The Var. VpnMask is unknown in version pre1.
Netmask is 255.0.0.0 on tap0 on both gateways.
Still the problem that you can ping the gateway on the other network but not
the machines behind it.
I've used the rpm download.
-----Original Message-----
From: Guus Sliepen [mailto:guus@warande3094.warande.uu.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, May
2013 Nov 18
1
samba4.1 RODC with BIND as DNS backend
OK, further to my previous message I've configured BIND, but when I try
to run samba_dnsupdate I get the following:
Nov 18 16:19:23 sles-shire named[6112]: samba b9_putrr: unhandled record
type 0
Nov 18 16:19:24 sles-shire named[6112]: samba_dlz: starting transaction
on zone _msdcs.main.adlab.netdirect.ca
Nov 18 16:19:24 sles-shire named[6112]: samba_dlz: disallowing update of
2017 Jun 07
4
Samba4 DC with Secondary Questions
Hello all.
I am currently working on setting an S4 domain to replace our aging samba 3
setup. We have found many answers on the net, in various documentation,
but when it comes to setting up beyond one node documentation becomes a
little thinner.
We are setting up a Primary DC with AD, using BIND9_DLZ, also serving dhcp
from Primary, and we want to setup a Secondary that is both a
2001 Jun 28
4
Tinc1.0pre4 & kernel 2.4.5 & tun/tap
Hi !
I want to setup tinc 1.0 pre4 with kernel 2.4.5 I didn't find
information about settings of tun/tap device
I did
in kernel -
[*] Prompt for development and/or incomplete code/drivers
Network device support
<M> Universal TUN/TAP device driver support
in /etc/modules.conf -
alias char-major-10-200 tun
mknod -m 600 /dev/tun c 10 200
chown 0.0 /dev/tun
In mailing list archive I
2013 Nov 19
1
Prepopulate *all* users to a samba4 RODC
I was hoping this would be simpler. I'd like to prepopulate an RODC with
all users accounts that are permitted. But I can only pre-populate one
at a time:
samba-tool rodc preload (<SID>|<DN>|<accountname>)
sles-shire:~ # samba-tool group listmembers 'Allowed RODC Password
Replication Group - Shire'
Allowed RODC Password Replication Group - Global
WIN7-SHIRE$
bilbo
2006 Apr 26
2
being courier_imap compatible
OK, I am running (for many years now) an existing courier_imap maildir
++ setup with exim as the MTA. Has been fine. I have my own custom
ldap schema for user account definition and authorization.
I installed dovecot 1.0 beta 7 as a test and have it listening on a
different port. I would like, if possible, to set things up so that
a user could use either dovecot or courier. Having to
2006 Apr 26
1
ldap and user_filter
I have my own custom schema for email that I have been using for
years with courier_imap and exim. I am experimenting with dovecot
and trying to set up my conf so that it logs in using the ldap database.
In the dovecot-ldap.conf there is a section
# Filter for user lookup. Some variables can be used (see
# http://wiki.dovecot.org/Variables for full list):
# %u - username
# %n - user
2014 Feb 08
1
Samba 3 to 4 AD migration - extensive permissions problems
Finally biting the bullet and upgrading home machines to Windows 7 but
experiencing many problems.
Server is a Debian Lenny, old Samba 3.2.5, new Samba 4.1.4 built from
source. My setup has been doing roaming profiles for XP since 2003 or so
with almost no changes. I want to keep roaming profiles going plus do some
folder redirection (Desktop (my wife doesn't believe in file shares for