similar to: Director + managesieve: is it posible?

Hi, still using 2.2.9, I've two directors, and these directors use both IPv4/IPv6 addresses. `host directors.<domain>` returns one A and AAA for each of the two directors: directors.<domain> has address 149.x.y.96 (director1) directors.<domain> has address 149.x.y.97 (director2) directors.<domain> has IPv6 address

Is there a specific order in which one has to add servers to director_mail_servers, Let's say I have 20 loadbalanced director servers (I dont, but for arguments sake). I want to add 5 servers to director_mail_servers. If I do this by restarting each director server 1 by 1 with an updated conf, it seems the 5 new servers dont get added. Or at least I dont get what makes it work eventually.

On 19 Sep 2018, at 11.30, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > >> >> On 19 Sep 2018, at 11.11, Simone Lazzaris <s.lazzaris at interactive.eu <mailto:s.lazzaris at interactive.eu>> wrote: >> >> In data mercoled? 19 settembre 2018 09:30:47 CEST, Timo Sirainen ha scritto: >> > On 18 Sep 2018, at 15.15, Simone Lazzaris <s.lazzaris at

Hi Timo, Upgraded to 2.0.14 last night for the director-related features and I noticed an oddity in the logs: Sep 28 09:53:21 director2 dovecot: master: Warning: service(ipc): client_limit reached, client connections are being dropped Sep 28 09:53:56 director1 dovecot: master: Warning: service(ipc): client_limit reached, client connections are being dropped Sep 28 09:54:23 director2 dovecot:

On 13 Oct 2015, at 22:31, Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > still using 2.2.9, I've two directors, and these directors > use both IPv4/IPv6 addresses. > > `host directors.<domain>` returns one A and AAA for each > of the two directors: > > directors.<domain> has address 149.x.y.96 (director1)

Hi, I've almost finished my new director based setup, but in the first test I discovered that imap and lmtp connections were not always being proxied to the same server. After some research now I think that the main problem is that in imap connections users connect as 'username' while lmtp connections are as 'username at mailserver'. In my current setup I receive mail via

Hi, My SSL auth got invalid, so I updated my SSL configuration (Apache works) This ist the log: --- Apr 22 11:01:55 rosi dovecot: imap-login: Debug: SSL: elliptic curve secp384r1 will be used for ECDH and ECDHE key exchanges Apr 22 11:01:55 rosi dovecot: imap-login: Debug: SSL: elliptic curve secp384r1 will be used for ECDH and ECDHE key exchanges Apr 22 11:01:55 rosi dovecot: auth: Debug: auth

Hello, using Dovecot 2.2.9 and a setup with directors and backends. The communication between directors and backends needs to be TLS secured. The director config contains a list of hostnames for the backends. (implicit list because of multiple A/AAAA records for a single hostname or explicit list of several host names) On connection setup from a client the director connects to the selected

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, Mobile Phone wrote: > New server & just added three domains: > now I see > "dovecot: imap-login: Aborted login (auth failed, 1 attempts in 5 secs): > user=<username.companyname>, method=PLAIN, rip=1.1.1.1, lip=99.99.99.99, > TLS, session=<kw6Y2NYviQBex5Un>" > Plus all Outlook users keep

Hi again I'm trying to authenticate a user against an LDAP Server (well, our AD, but it can LDAP). This is my configuration: hosts = my.server.local auth_bind = yes ldap_version = 3 base = CN=Person,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=company,DC=local scope = subtree user_attrs = \ =home=/home/imapproxy/%u, \ =mail=maildir:/home/imapproxy/%u pass_attrs = uid=%u, userPassword=%w

Dear all, We would like to setup, if possible, for example: We have 4 example groups, we various users in those groups: Directors director1,director2 Support manager1,support1,support2,support3 Enquiries manager2,enquiry1,enquiry2,enquiry3 Accounts manager3, accounts1,account2 Shared Mailboxes: Support: Support, user1, user2, user3 Accounts: Directors, Support So basically, we want 2

Hello, i have a setup with two director servers pointing to two backends. I don't care that much for load balancing, my main goal is high availability. CRAM-MD5 auth is working fine if I connect directly to the backends, but the director only supports AUTH=PLAIN because of the static passdb. director config: > passdb { > driver = static > args = nopassword=y proxy=y > } >

Timo, Just this morning I upgraded from 2.0.6 to 2.0.7 (hg changeset 66a523135836). A few hours later we had some power problems that caused the networking to drop out at one site. The directors on the surviving site all had a few imap-login processes crash with the following error: Nov 23 09:15:30 cc-director1 dovecot: imap-login: Panic: file ioloop.c: line 35 (io_add): assertion failed: (fd

On 19 Sep 2018, at 11.42, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > > On 19 Sep 2018, at 11.30, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi <mailto:tss at iki.fi>> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 19 Sep 2018, at 11.11, Simone Lazzaris <s.lazzaris at interactive.eu <mailto:s.lazzaris at interactive.eu>> wrote: >>> >>> In data mercoled? 19

Hi all, we're having a bad day with email :) I have a user who was complaining of poor performance today when opening mailboxes. Total time to open the box was about 1 minute. Upon truss'ing the imap process during an open, I saw the trace quoted below at the end of the email. As you can see, for each "FETCH" line of response, we were seeing dovecot do a ton of work-- mmaping

Version: 2.2.9 & 2.2.15 ( http://ppa.launchpad.net/malte.swart/dovecot-2.2/ubuntu ) OS: Ubuntu 14.04 Server LTS I installed Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS newly on my new server... And I try to configure the mail server considering both my system account and the virtual mailboxes, by seeing https://www.exratione.com/2014/05/a-mailserver-on-ubuntu-1404-postfix-dovecot-mysql/ But when I configured by

Hi, Trying to implement a master user (1) for auditing purposes without luck. Ubuntu 18.04.3, canonical official repos only, no ppa nor self-compiled anything. From the log below I understand the master password succeeds but AD auth fails. I am pretty sure I missed something here. Also, notice the messages "Ignoring unknown passdb extra field: original_user". Log: Nov? 1 14:02:32

Hi mailing list, I'm currently running dovecot 2.2.13 from Debian Jessie, all is running fine. However I am attempting to merge 2 LDAP authentication sources. I would like to attempt to authenticate against the first authentication source, if that fails either by password fail or user not found, then attempt the next LDAP server. I've added the a passdb and userdb entry for the new

I am using Dovecot in two Server environments. My Legacy (5 years+ old) servers are running dovecot 1.1.20, and are responding as expected. These servers are using an NFS based storage for the /home directory structure, and are working beautifully. However, I need to replace these inefficient servers, and get more current. That brings me to the problem, where I am implementing Dovecot

Hi, I am setting up a dovecot instance to host a bunch of virtual domains, with ldap backing for auth. I am using a single hostname for test purposes, with a couple of entries in the diectory. If I use auth binds I get a result, but this does not suit the end purpose of the server. If I use ldapsearch with the same base, search filter, and credentials as the ldap auth config I get the correct