similar to: [Bug 613] New: iptables not accepting RELATED, ESTABLISHED udp packets

Has anything changed this 2 years with wine and Win snmptrap support?

Hi, I have simple question about Skype. What are the methods of selecting packets which belongs to Skype?? I know about 7layer but I don''t belive that is only way. Is 7layer realy good and stable solution for routers which must handle more than 1000 users ? Thanks in advance Pozdrawiam Szymon Turkiewicz

Kirtland Air Force Base has denied approval for the use of R on its Windows network. Some of their objections seem a bit strange, but some appear to be legitimate. In particular, they have detected registry "vulnerabilities" which are detailed in the attachment. I know nothing about Windows registry vulnerabilities. If any of these issues are legitimate concerns,

with ipv6, you just allow the specific ports destined to the specific local machine(s) in on your WAN side, they don't need translating. same sort of rule as if you had a internet-facing service running on the routing system On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 11:55 AM Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> wrote: > I finally got an ISP connection with working IPv6 and now I need to add

Hi all, I have network with few win 95/xp machines and suse 9.3 prof server. On every win client is installed RealPopup (RealPopup homepage: www.realpopup.it). I can send popup message from my xp computer to win 95, and I can get reply on new message addressed from win 95 computer, so looks like popup communication works well. If I use: server:~ # echo "test" | smbclient -M bane

I'm trying to use snmpwalk to look at other machines, but I can't get a response. It keeps timing out. It can see itself, though. I haven't had this problem with other machines and I don't know what's different. Suggestions? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello everyone, I'm a newbie of llvm. I'm trying to insert Intel MPX instruction BNDCU with BuildMI. I add my machinefunctionpass at addPreEmitPass2. Here is the code of insertion: BuildMI(MBB, MI, DL, TII->get(X86::BNDCU64rr)).addReg(X86::BND2, RegState::Define).addReg(X86::R10); And here is to stack track when I compiler program with modified llc:

Hi, Over the past few days I've been trying to get a prototype working of a stateful firewall for a Virtual Machine using Libvirt's network filters. My goal is to replace the current custom Python/Java code in the Apache CloudStack [0] project by Network Filters of Libvirt. Both IPv4 and IPv6 should work, but I started off with IPv4 and I have issues with accepting back

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=512 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-09-18 07:36 MET ------- There are still some problems with the PPtP helper, I'm currently trying to fix these. Can you attach a tcpdump of a failed attempt please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are

I have an APC Back-UPS CS 500 which connects via USB. I am running NUT 2.4.1 under Karmic amd64. The entry in ups.conf is [apc] driver = usbhid-ups port = auto desc = "APC Back-UPS CS 500" I left upsd.conf at the default values, nut.conf is "mode standalone", and in upsmon.conf, the monitor line is MONITOR apc at localhost 1 ups_local mypassword master and in upsd.users,

If you have experience with these phones... We are trying to figure out how to transfer an established call on the SPA504G while a second call is incoming. At present, the receptionist has to answer every single incoming call before the XFER softkey is seen again. This is completely unpractical for a receptionist that may have 4 or more calls coming in at the same time. When the

Hi: Need help. Using Actionmailer in development mode, and I keep getting this error: A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond. - connect(2) This is my first time trying to use action mailer. I am trying to test an email confirmation using authlogic.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1143 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Comment #2 from djm at mindrot.org 2006-07-06 21:09

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1143 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED ------- Comment #3 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-10-07 11:44 ------- Change all RESOLVED bug to CLOSED with the exception

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98 ------- Additional Comments From elacour@easter-eggs.com 2003-06-11 19:32 ------- I forget: If I insert a drop on protocol 4 before "ESTABLISHED" rules, ip in ip is really denied. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 12:07:37 +0100 Vegard Vesterheim <vegard.vesterheim at uninett.no> wrote: > # mknod -m 666 /dev/tty c 4 0 > mknod: `/dev/tty': Operation not permitted In the manual for the LXC driver this part of my question is answered: "The container init process will be started with CAP_MKNOD capability removed and blocked from re-acquiring it. As such it will

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1103 Summary: New option for ssh(1) to make it failing when remote port forwarding can't be established Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1143 Summary: connections with "sshd: root at notty" is established but not closed Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.9p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: Kerberos support

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1103 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |1155 nThis| | Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1103 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED ------- Comment #3 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-09-28 19:25 ------- With the release of 4.4, we believe that this bug is