Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[Bug 521] [patch] - some changes to runme script"
2007 Feb 24
6
[Bug 547] use jhash2 in __hash_conntrack
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=547
------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-02-24 22:21 MET -------
Looks reasonable, but please don't add bugreports for stuff like this. If you
add a Signed-off-by: line I'm going to apply it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this
2006 Oct 05
0
[Bug 521] New: [patch] - some changes to runme script
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=521
Summary: [patch] - some changes to runme script
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: patch-o-matic-ng
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: unknown
AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org
2006 Sep 15
18
[Bug 511] Premature ip_conntrack timer expiry on 3+ window size advertisements
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=511
------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-09-15 06:42 MET -------
So you're saying the problem is that the receiver updates its window multiple
times without receiving any data in between, thereby falsely triggering the
"dead-peer detection" (as you call it)?
--
Configure bugmail:
2006 Apr 21
16
[Bug 460] Unknown error 4294967295
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=460
laforge@netfilter.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org
2006 Jun 28
7
[Bug 479] tunnel0 and br0
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=479
netfilter@linuxace.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com
------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-06-28 02:57 MET -------
Tom - did
2006 Feb 08
30
[Bug 444] REDIRECT not working in kernel 2.6.16-rc[12] as before (<= 2.6.15.x)
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=444
------- Additional Comments From spiney@spiney.org 2006-02-08 19:18 MET -------
Created an attachment (id=207)
--> (https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=207&action=view)
kernel 2.6.15, telnet localhost 10025
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
-------
2006 Aug 25
9
[Bug 503] ip_conntrack_sip , ip_nat_sip DNAT
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=503
siqhamo@newlunar.co.za changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are
2007 May 26
14
[Bug 570] PREROUTING is unaware of VLAN interfaces
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=570
kaber@trash.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-05-26
2006 Aug 29
7
[Bug 507] tun99 don't trapped by tun+
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=507
kaber@trash.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-08-29
2007 Apr 27
11
[Bug 562] Recent module is not working for the ppp0 (external) interface.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=562
------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-04-27 02:41 MET -------
I asked you to post this with additional information to the mailinglists, so
pleast at least include the information here or post it to the lists as I asked.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
-------
2007 Feb 25
5
[Bug 549] kernel oops when trying to remove ip_conntrack module
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=549
------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-02-25 22:58 MET -------
> When ip_conntrack_pptp / ip_nat_pptp modules are loaded in addition
to ftp ones, the oops happens in one of the latter two modules.
I'm not sure I understand. ip_conntrack shouldn't be unloadable while these
modules are still loaded, so how
2006 Feb 14
11
[Bug 449] [patch] mount-point+inode ipt_owner patch (created 18 months ago)
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=449
------- Additional Comments From lkcl@lkcl.net 2006-02-14 19:19 MET -------
Created an attachment (id=212)
--> (https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=212&action=view)
patch to ipt_owner.c for "mountpoint+inode" functionality
--
Configure bugmail:
2007 Jan 28
4
[Bug 539] doc typo
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=539
kaber@trash.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-01-28
2006 May 22
6
[Bug 479] tunnel0 and br0
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=479
------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-05-22 14:42 MET -------
It is not entirely clear what you are trying to show with that LOG line.
How is the traffic flowing, what do you expect? And why is it visible
in plaintext on the br0 device? Please also include your kernel version.
--
Configure bugmail:
2007 Jan 28
4
[Bug 536] Attempting to remove a non-empty userchain gives poor error message
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=536
kaber@trash.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |kaber@trash.net
------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-01-28 02:35 MET -------
I can reproduce this, but
2006 Jan 28
5
[Bug 318] masq fails on existing connection using marks and iproute2 source routing
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=318
------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-01-28 17:29 MET -------
Please execute"echo 255 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_log_invalid"
after loading ipt_LOG and post the results.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this
2007 Jan 11
3
[Bug 531] ip_tables.h: IPT_TABLE_MAXNAMELEN bogously #defined to XT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=531
kaber@trash.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |kaber@trash.net
------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-01-11 19:00 MET -------
Very nice catch. I guess it
2006 May 31
20
[Bug 481] tun + pptp nat helper
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=481
------- Additional Comments From joseba.beltran@gmail.com 2006-05-31 19:09 MET -------
Many pptp nat helper users are suffering this problem:
http://www.chillispot.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4118&highlight=pptp
http://www.chillispot.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=958&highlight=pptp
2006 Jan 25
8
[Bug 400] connection tracking does not work on VLANs if underlying interface is a bridge
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=400
------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-01-25 12:55 MET -------
Please add a LOG rule to PRE_ROUTING in the mangle table and post the output.
BTW, are you using hardware checksumming (check with ethtool) on the underlying
ethernet device?
--
Configure bugmail:
2007 Jan 26
4
[Bug 532] ip_nat_sip rewrote Call-ID instead of Contact - patch attached
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=532
kaber@trash.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |kaber@trash.net
------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-01-26 19:45 MET -------
(In reply to comment #0)
>