similar to: [Bug 469] recent match doesn't triger with --hitcount > 20

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=469 Summary: recent match doesn't triger with --hitcount > 20 Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo:

Hello everybody For network simulation purposes I am trying to run a Linux image with a PAX enabled grsec kernel on a Gentoo xen-3.1.1 with HVM. While the image boots flawlessly on real hardware the kernel does not really like the fully virtualized Xen/Qemu environment. It does not succeed to boot (for dmesg see attachment). I first tried with the grsec- patched 2.6.14.6 sources but it

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=451 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-02-18 19:35 MET ------- Which

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=466 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Hi list! I''m trying to run 2.4.29-xenU with grsec. Jacob Gorm Hansen said couple of weeks ago, that grsec should work with xen when pax is disabled.. Well, to get the kernel compiling there''s some source hacking that needs to be done.. I''ll describe what I did and what error I got: I downloaded xen-2.0-testing-src.tgz and extracted it. I edited the toplevel Makefile

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=564 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:56:50PM +0100, Olivier Mauras wrote: > > > On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 16:05 -0500, Laine Stump wrote: > > On 02/24/2015 03:37 PM, Olivier Mauras wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> I've been trying to boot a VM with the rootfs being a 9P share from > > >> the host. The VM OS is centos 7. > > >>

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=339 ------- Additional Comments From scrizt@ludd.ltu.se 2006-06-26 17:57 MET ------- Is this bug forgotten ? Anyhow, I ran into it when setting up this strange network of mine.. I dont think my setup is causing anything strange however.. It appears even if no machine is connected to the "inner" port of the bridge.. I

Hello, I've been trying to boot a VM with the rootfs being a 9P share from the host. The VM OS is centos 7. The OS boots but no services can work and it appears that the authentication system is broken. Now the funny thing is that booting the same OS on the same 9P share manually with Qemu works as expected with a fully functionnal OS... So I'm wondering what could libvirt do that render

On 02/24/2015 03:37 PM, Olivier Mauras wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've been trying to boot a VM with the rootfs being a 9P share from >> the host. The VM OS is centos 7. >> The OS boots but no services can work and it appears that the >> authentication system is broken. >> >> Now the funny thing is that booting the same OS on the same 9P share

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=488 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-06-24 19:10 MET ------- Not

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=428 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-02-28 03:22 MET ------- What kernel

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=470 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Severity|blocker |normal ------- Additional Comments From

Hi, this happens since a few days on a Gentoo hardened system using a grsecurity enabled kernel running Dovecot 1.0.10, only to 2 of 10 users though: --8<-- kernel: grsec: From 192.168.0.1: denied resource overstep by \ requesting 537325568 for RLIMIT_AS against limit 536870912 \ for /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap[imap:15708] uid/euid:30010/30010 \ gid/egid:30006/30006, parent

>This is pretty surprising. When a domU is actually running, dom0 isn''t >really involved (other than for IO), so its surprising grsec makes a >difference. >Do you get any console output from the guest before it crashes? I''m >wandering if its actually been built incorrectly by the domain builder >running in dom0. I don''t get any output from the guest

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=493 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=468 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-04-11 03:11 MET ------- Patches

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=477 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=475 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|