similar to: [Bug 438] New: lipiptc development headers installed by default

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=438 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=569 Summary: in6addr_any undeclared Product: iptables Version: CVS (please indicate timestamp) Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=826 Summary: libiptc/libip6tc.h doesn't specify C linkage Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: libiptc AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=638 Summary: make libiptc a public interface Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: libiptc AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy:

Has anyone tried getting Speakeasy VOIP to work with Asterisk? I just got Speakeasy DSL and am thinking of trying out their VOIP [1] with the hope that the quality/stability will be better than broadvoice. I searched in the usual places (voip-info.org, the asterisk users mailing list archives [2], dslreports.com) and couldn't find anything. Any other places I should look? Thanks, Simon

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102 Summary: ipv6_prefix_length works only on LITTLE_ENDIAN and prefix_length % 8 == 0 Product: iptables userspace Version: 1.2.8 Platform: other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: libiptc

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Product|netfilter/iptables |iptables userspace Version|linux-2.4.x

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1289 Bug ID: 1289 Summary: iptables build fails with kernel 4.20-rc1 - gnu_inline attributes Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1067 Bug ID: 1067 Summary: Compilation failure on Linux 4.5.x when including libiptc/libiptc.h Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables

I should be more specific . What I meant to ask was - is it necessary for the directory that icecast streams or serves files from to "everyone" or the "world" have at least read permissions. I do plan to experiment with the permisions but I was just asking to see if any one had already tried this. I like to lock down my system as much as possible. Thanks for the help!

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1275 Bug ID: 1275 Summary: if IPTC_DEBUG is defined, compiler reports errors Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: libiptc Assignee: netfilter-buglog

A little off topic this morning...I'm thinking about switching out of Comast's clutches to another high-speed service. I've tried TDS DSL, but they were half the speed comast was/is. I''ve looked into Speakeasy, since I heard a few of ya talking about them. Since I had TDS, that kinda tells me I can get DSL. I live in Mount Juliet, on MT juliet road, behind the

heya... i'm extremely new to the list (10 minutes), and i have a burnin' question that i was hopin' you folks could help me out with. i'm running beos as an encoder box, with two streams (8000 and 8001) hosted on it. the idea is to use my redhat box to relay those streams to the public using icecast, allowing the be machines cpu cycles to focus solely on encoding. anyway, i

Hey all- Trying to run sh 1.2.8 and iptables 1.2.5 on my linux 2.4.17 box. I build the kernel from kernel.org sources, and then patched it with iptables 1.2.5 by doing %make pending-patches KERNEL_DIR=/usr/src/linux I let it run and patched these: Welcome to Rusty''s Patch-o-matic! Each patch is a new feature: many have minimal impact, some do not. Almost every one has bugs, so I

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1291 Bug ID: 1291 Summary: iptables 1.8.0+ no longer builds against kernel 3.10.108 Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: arm OS: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables

Put your love of puppet to work with us at Speakeasy. We need Engineers who want to use puppet in conjunction with re-architecting our infrastructure. We are based in downtown Seattle, overlooking Elliot Bay. Please send your resume or any questions directly to me and off-list. Thanks, -g Company summary: Speakeasy, one of the nation’s leading broadband voice (VoIP), data and IT service

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1331 Bug ID: 1331 Summary: libiptc.c: missing memset causes that the garbage is read Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: SuSE Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: iptables

Dear List, I checked in archives (does the search work? All my queries return no founds, then I tried just loading the whole thing and using a browser search) Anyway -- static playlist order. What determines what order the files displayed by the http://www.server.com:8000/file/ ? I sorted my playlist alphabetically and started icecast and ices, but the playlist is still displaying

Recently I've started to see quite a few clients connecting with Engelmann AudioJack ('Engelmann Media Radio Listener' is the browser ID): http://www.audiojack.org/?file=Index&lang=english Anybody else seeing quite a few of these clients all of a sudden? I don't have a windows box to try this software on, but from their website it looks like something equivalent to the XM

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=450 Summary: connbytes not working Product: iptables Version: 1.3.5 Platform: i386 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy: vselico@vselico.sk When