similar to: [Bug 95] inverse limit match doesn't work

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95 ------- Additional Comments From niels.laukens@tijd.com 2004-07-04 23:29 ------- (sorry to disturb): will this (ever) fix? is it fixed with the attachement? or won't it fix? or is there an alternative? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-05-31 23:25 ------- I can confirm this bug. neither libipt_limit.c nor ipt_limit.c contain any handling of inversion. Together with Bug #94, I think it's time to rewrite parts of the limit match in order to address those issues. I doubt this will be possible

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=447 Bug 447 depends on bug 440, which changed state. Bug 440 Summary: Space in filename causes Forged DCC command from x.x.x.x: 0.0.0.0:0 https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=440 What |Old Value |New Value ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Which kernel supports the iptables'' -m dstlimit? Do I need a patch or something else to get it to work? Is it too experimental? -- Покотиленко Костик <casper@meteor.dp.ua>

Hi all, i need advice how can i limit ip_conntrack per IP. clients of network that i support often uses torrent , DC++ , eMule clients and i have lost packages because they open too many ports. i have traffic control limits but this obviously isn''t enough Any advance how to prevent server from this kind problems will be welcome. Best regards Emil

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=464 ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-07-15 18:38 MET ------- Jurgen: you are behind a box which doesn't understand the SACK option. From your trace: 02:52:32.237095 IP 134.76.88.65.11064 > 84.132.150.225.32805: P 237274514:237275954(1440) ack 372631662 win 181 <nop,nop,timestamp 229942196

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=564 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=469 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95 Summary: inverse limit match doesn't work Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Mandrake Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-10-08 16:44 ------- it is impossible to use this solution, since it would change the structure size between kernel and userspace. This way everybody would need to recompile the iptables userspace program, and there is no forward/backwards compatibility :(

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=887 Summary: iptables.xslt wrong "match" -m handling Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: unknown AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

Hi, Finally got this working!! I have found a potential Workaround to the following error: >/etc/X11/gdm/PreSession/Default: Registering your session with wtmp >and > utmp > /etc/X11/gdm/PreSession/Default: running: /usr/bin/X11/sessreg -a >-w /var/log/wtmp -u /var/run/utmp -x "/var/gdm/:0.Xservers" -h "" -1 >":0" >"test" >Xlib:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com

Hello, list members, can i limit pps rate with linux? How? -m limit does not fit, as i understood: it can help with low rates only (is that true? any suggestions?) Thank you, -- _,-=._ /|_/| `-.} `=._,.-=-._., @ @._, `._ _,-. ) _,.-'' ` G.m-"^m`m'' Dmytro O. Redchuk

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=464 ------- Additional Comments From holm@theorie.physik.uni-goettingen.de 2006-06-14 15:00 MET ------- I run into the same probs with Mandriva kernel. All kernel >2.6.11 are definitly affected. kernel 2.6.8.1 has no problems. Hope this helps a little bit. -- Configure bugmail:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=847 Summary: Owner matching fails on listening socket Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=820 Summary: Quotas not limiting the exact specified limit Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: unknown AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at

I am trying to run 'xhost +' on CentOS 8 (such that I can grab a screen shot) but its not letting me. On boot of X I run the "xhost +" then later with SSH into hte box - I run export DISPLAY=:0.0 gnome-screenshot -f jj.png and I get the cannot open display message. This works on the older CentOS 7. What is the magic for C8? Thanks, Jerry

Hello list, In the past we have instructed users to perform 'xhost +' from their centos desktop, then set the DISPLAY variable on a remote computer to forward their display back to the desktop. This does not seem to work on centos 6 - but it did work in centos 5. It works from a vnc session on the desktop machine, but does not work from the local desktop. We would typically use a display

> I would appreciate any insights over compiling R 3.4 with Intel MKL -- I have been successful until R 3.3.3 but now it stops complaining about pcre though it worked without Intel MKL as follows, I successfully built R-rc_2017-04-19_r72555.tar.gz with icc & MKL on centos 7 with this: # https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/build-r-301-with-intel-c-compiler-and-intel-mkl-on-linux#