similar to: [Bug 105] Connection tracking table full, no new connections accepted

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-06-24 20:00 ------- Did you try to enlarge your connection tracking table? (Pleae read the FAQ) Do the /proc/net/ip_conntrack entries look plausible, or are there lots of entries with unreasonably high timeout? ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Hello I''ve setuped a bridge with l7-filter and ipp2p. We have every day + or - between 10Mbits and 30 Mbits P2P traffic from + or - 450 customers. When traffic increase. I''ve got this kind of error message : Feb 23 14:26:19 gestor1 kernel: printk: 38 messages suppressed. Feb 23 14:26:19 gestor1 kernel: ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. The server is celeron

xen-3.0.3-94.el5_4.2 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5xen RHEL5.4 x86_64 I''ve got a dom0 that does nothing but have a DomU created. The DomU gets plenty of load. Over time, the dom0''s ipconntrack table fills up but not the DomU. Once it gets full I can restart iptables and it''s fine. The strange thing is this only happens on hosts I have provided (hardware and hosting) from one

I have just completed the installation of a new firewall running Shorewall 1.4 on Mandrake 9.2 for our campus network. It appears to be running fairly well so far, but is generating significantly more log entries than our previous linux 2.0.x firewall... Our previous firewall enjoyed more than 6 years of 24/7 operation with no downtime before we finally decided it needed more horsepower, and

I was trying to do what the article at http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.performance.html#conntrack_filling_tables <http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.performance.html#conntrack_filling_tables%3C/blockquote%3E%3C/div%3E> suggested My iptables rules are ------------------------------------------------------------------------ #that's what the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105 Summary: Connection tracking table full, no new connections accepted Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: connection

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=830 Summary: ??iptables????????? Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy: higkoohk

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-10-08 16:59 ------- are you using the

Hi, my ip_conntrack table is filling up and now my server is dropping packets. I'm running CentOS release 4.4 (Final) on a fairly busy webserver. The table is full of various connections, including a lot of "ESTABLISHED" tcp connections from my webserver (the src is my webserver ip), and some other random connections to my webserver, and many "ASSURED" connections. So why

Hey guys, I have several Linux routers in place at high-usage locations (student apartment complexes). I''m having trouble with some of the routers which use 6Mbit DSL lines as their Internet feed. The routers use PPPoE and perform NAT. During peak usage periods, the routers are dropping alot of packets. I''m lead to believe this is because there are too many active

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-16 09:36 ------- you seem to be running a

I *think* we are finally making some progress in tracking our elusive performance problems. After employing a second 10Mb link from our ISP, along with another firewall box and proxy, we were able to determine the problem *is* our firewall. We don''t know exactly why yet, but our sporadic slow web access seems to have gone away since swapping a new firewall in this morning. The

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-14 08:39 ------- what patches from patch-o-matic do you use? Do you know how to reproduce this behaviour? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

I''ve been having all sorts of problems the last few days with my connection slowing down and then stopping working. Rebooting the router box always fixes it for a while. When I couldn''t hit any pages this morning, and couldn''t even ssh into the router, I dug around a little. When I did a dmesg on the router, there were a bunch of errors saying: ip_conntrack: table full,

Hi all, I''m searching for a tutorial how to setup multiple network cards with xen network bridge setup in debian lenny. My problem is, bridges seams only to work if i put an ip adress in dom0 to them. Thanks, Alex _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi all. i'm trying to modify some parameters but when system reboots it doesn't load. For the sysctl if I run sysctl -p then it changes /etc/sysctl.conf net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max = 1048576 /etc/modprobe.conf options ip_conntrack hashsize=131072 after reboot results cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_max 65536 cat

I don''t think this has anything to do with Shorewall but I am not too familiar with iptables stuff yet so I''m not sure. Running Shorewall shorewall-1.4.9 on Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (FiveStar) for i586 Kernel 2.4.22-37mdk. Run "nmap -sP 192.168.x.x/24" (for example), where 192.168.x.x/24 is the LAN. You can do this from a firewall/router, or even from a

hi, it''d be very useful to add some kind of "log everything" option to shorewall. currently the logging is useful if you know what you would like to log. but if you don''t know than it''s a problem... another problem that currently it''s not possible to log the nat table. at least i can''t find any way (can''t add logging into masq and

Hi to all. I have a shorewall ver 2.0.13 running in Fedora Core 3, the machine has dual cpu, 1gb of ram, and 40GB of hard disk space. The machine runs shorewall only and had tested it to openvpn but most of the time just shorewall. The problem, there were instances when internet traffic coming from the local network just halts, I needed to restart shorewall in order the traffic to flow again.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-03 16:49 ------- We haven't seen this