similar to: [Bug 105] Connection tracking table full, no new connections accepted

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |LATER ------- Additional Comments From

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-10-08 16:59 ------- are you using the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105 Summary: Connection tracking table full, no new connections accepted Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: connection

Hello I''ve setuped a bridge with l7-filter and ipp2p. We have every day + or - between 10Mbits and 30 Mbits P2P traffic from + or - 450 customers. When traffic increase. I''ve got this kind of error message : Feb 23 14:26:19 gestor1 kernel: printk: 38 messages suppressed. Feb 23 14:26:19 gestor1 kernel: ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. The server is celeron

I was trying to do what the article at http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.performance.html#conntrack_filling_tables <http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.performance.html#conntrack_filling_tables%3C/blockquote%3E%3C/div%3E> suggested My iptables rules are ------------------------------------------------------------------------ #that's what the

Hi, my ip_conntrack table is filling up and now my server is dropping packets. I'm running CentOS release 4.4 (Final) on a fairly busy webserver. The table is full of various connections, including a lot of "ESTABLISHED" tcp connections from my webserver (the src is my webserver ip), and some other random connections to my webserver, and many "ASSURED" connections. So why

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=830 Summary: ??iptables????????? Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy: higkoohk

Hi all. i'm trying to modify some parameters but when system reboots it doesn't load. For the sysctl if I run sysctl -p then it changes /etc/sysctl.conf net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max = 1048576 /etc/modprobe.conf options ip_conntrack hashsize=131072 after reboot results cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_max 65536 cat

Hey guys, I have several Linux routers in place at high-usage locations (student apartment complexes). I''m having trouble with some of the routers which use 6Mbit DSL lines as their Internet feed. The routers use PPPoE and perform NAT. During peak usage periods, the routers are dropping alot of packets. I''m lead to believe this is because there are too many active

xen-3.0.3-94.el5_4.2 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5xen RHEL5.4 x86_64 I''ve got a dom0 that does nothing but have a DomU created. The DomU gets plenty of load. Over time, the dom0''s ipconntrack table fills up but not the DomU. Once it gets full I can restart iptables and it''s fine. The strange thing is this only happens on hosts I have provided (hardware and hosting) from one

I have just completed the installation of a new firewall running Shorewall 1.4 on Mandrake 9.2 for our campus network. It appears to be running fairly well so far, but is generating significantly more log entries than our previous linux 2.0.x firewall... Our previous firewall enjoyed more than 6 years of 24/7 operation with no downtime before we finally decided it needed more horsepower, and

I *think* we are finally making some progress in tracking our elusive performance problems. After employing a second 10Mb link from our ISP, along with another firewall box and proxy, we were able to determine the problem *is* our firewall. We don''t know exactly why yet, but our sporadic slow web access seems to have gone away since swapping a new firewall in this morning. The

Hi all, i need advice how can i limit ip_conntrack per IP. clients of network that i support often uses torrent , DC++ , eMule clients and i have lost packages because they open too many ports. i have traffic control limits but this obviously isn''t enough Any advance how to prevent server from this kind problems will be welcome. Best regards Emil

I''ve been having all sorts of problems the last few days with my connection slowing down and then stopping working. Rebooting the router box always fixes it for a while. When I couldn''t hit any pages this morning, and couldn''t even ssh into the router, I dug around a little. When I did a dmesg on the router, there were a bunch of errors saying: ip_conntrack: table full,

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-08-08 09:40 ------- Are you really sure it stops forwarding the packets? Have you verified this with tcpdump/ethereal on the public internet interface? Does /proc/net/ip_conntrack still show the NAT entries? Are you sure you are not just trying to use SNAT with a

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-16 09:36 ------- you seem to be running a

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-20 10:55 ------- This looks strange. The BUG in slab.c tells us that there is a GFP_ATOMIC missing. This means that we are allocating kernel memory from softirq context with only GFP_KERNEL. If I understand your backtrace correctly, what happens is: - you are

Hi to all. I have a shorewall ver 2.0.13 running in Fedora Core 3, the machine has dual cpu, 1gb of ram, and 40GB of hard disk space. The machine runs shorewall only and had tested it to openvpn but most of the time just shorewall. The problem, there were instances when internet traffic coming from the local network just halts, I needed to restart shorewall in order the traffic to flow again.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47 ------- Additional Comments From dg@ezcom.de 2003-06-30 16:17 ------- today i replaced my 8139too with a 3c59x and the corruptions are gone ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Hi, I know that this is a known problem but I don''t know the solution. I have a linux server with iptables, kernel 2.4.17. Now in logs appear (Debian): kern.log: Mar 1 23:12:55 cpie kernel: ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. Mar 1 23:13:56 cpie last message repeated 10 times Mar 1 23:13:59 cpie last message repeated 3 times Mar 1 23:14:10 cpie kernel: NET: 1 messages