similar to: [Bug 98] state ESTABLISHED allow ipip tunnels

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|

Hi, I've got those crash entries in my logs and there is multiple smbd process eating a lot of cpu/mem. I'm using samba 3.0.4, rpmsource from samba.org rebuilt with posix acls support. Samba is linked with an openldap-2.0.27. All of this on redhat ES 3 :/ Any hint to fix this problem? [2004/06/17 17:57:39, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:create_canon_ace_lists(1482) create_canon_ace_lists:

I was trying the following setup with IPIP tunnels, one that used to work through another ISP, but no longer... Internal network | Linux box 1 (kernel 2.2.24) iif=10.0.0.1, extf=a.b.c.d, tunf=172.16.0.1 | |local metropolitan network | Another Linux box 2 (kernel 2.2.17, or 2.4.19, same result) iif=irrelevant, extf=x.y.z.v,

Hi guys, I''m trying to setup an IPIP tunnel between a Cisco router and a firewall running Debian GNU/Linux Sarge with Shorewall 2.0.13. I''ve read and implemented the http://shorewall.net/IPIP.htm document, but I don''t understand why there should be at the same time a "tunnel" and a "tunnels" script. Shorewall still refuses to let the

Hi, Does anyone tried to get ipip or gre tunnel behind NAT environments. ? i''m trying to make both side tunneling with ipip or gre with private address just like belows.. A -------------------FIRWWAL -------------------INET ------------------- B PRIVATE PUBLIC PUBLIC (10.100.0.1) (211.xxx.xxx.xxx) (

Hello, Looking here http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.tunnel.ip-ip.html It says to load a new_tunnel.o module. There is no such module on 2.6.9, so where would I find up-to-date documentation on ip tunnels in the Linux kernel? Thanks, Mike -- Michael P. Soulier <michael_soulier@mitel.com>, 613-592-2122 x2522 "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a

Hi, I''ve a gateway host (cali), connected to the Internet via ADSL and a PPTP tunnel (ppp0). I also have a IPIP tunnel to another host over the Internet (mytun), nothing fancy. This is working perfectly. But I want to give more priority to the IPIP packets coming OUT of the PPP (PPTP connection) interface. And I can''t get this to work. Class 2:21 is the one with high

Hello Gurus, I am a small problem with routing and here are the details. Interfaces on my server: * ipsec0 - 172.19.58.94 * tunl0 - 172.19.58.94 * eth0 - 172.19.58.94 Now, the problem is that there is another host 172.19.58.200. All communication to 172.19.58.200 should be through tunl0, and all the data should be secured using IPSec (tunnel mode - because there are more machines on my

After carefull reading (LARTC) and experimentation, I am in a dead end... I am using several IPIP tunnels (linux ipip module, IP protocol 4). I''d like to filter packets going through these tunnes to different classes, on the ingress device, based on source and destination IP _INSIDE THE TUNNEL_. First I tried the nexthdr bit. As explained in LARTC, nexthdr jumps to the next header

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-20 11:00 ------- what kernel are you running? which patches (from patch-o-matic) did you apply? please give us some more information :) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> schrieb: > Can I suggest you have a look here: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Main_Page Well, I got it! I found this HowTo: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_Samba_as_an_AD_Domain_Member and now it works! I'm puzzled why on other Servers the previous configuration works, but if I have now this Server, too, with a working Samba

Hi, I''m trying to do some horrible private address routing between networks. Is there a way to handle the following? I''m guessing policy routing *might* be the way, but anyway... Two networks, accessible via public addresses -- a /29 on each. Each network, however, has more machines than this, so one also has 192.168.0.0/24 and the other has 192.168.1.0/24. I have an IPIP

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=440 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-02-09 15:51 MET ------- In the DCC Specifcication

spring has sprung, so on this day of grass, i guess i just can't hold this back any more. > http://zenmagiclove.com/aarp2.py voila. a dingus for zen markup language. lighter than markdown. _and_ more powerful... i know. wha? go figure. not that it's a competition. supporters will love finally seeing a look. detractors will love the bugs i left in there, just for them, as

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115 Summary: incorrect "state RELATED,ESTABLISHED" checking with two interfaces Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

Hi I am trying to setup an ipip tunnel to another linux router and am having serious problems. A bit of background first though because we may be going at this from the wrong angle. I have a router that runs bering firewall of a CF flash card that is going to act as a gteway for the amateur radio amprnet network. Heres what I need from it- I have an internal network 192.168.1.1 etc and a

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bowles@ambisys.com Component|unknown |ip_tables (kernel) OS/Version|other

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47 ------- Additional Comments From dg@ezcom.de 2003-06-30 16:17 ------- today i replaced my 8139too with a 3c59x and the corruptions are gone ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Hello Everyone, I wanted to announce our "just for fun" ruby on rails/ajaxified web application. http://www.rateyourmates.net Our goal was to combine the power of google maps, geographical statistics, and instant feedback using rjs/ajax to create a site that is personal and uniquely interesting for all viewers. We hope people really have fun navigating throughout the site and ultimately