similar to: [Bug 80] Not detected packets?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 60000 matches similar to: "[Bug 80] Not detected packets?"

2003 Apr 18
1
[Bug 80] Not detected packets?
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80 ------- Additional Comments From ral928@wish.nl 2003-04-18 21:54 ------- /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/rp_filter are set to "1" /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/accept_source_route are set to "0" The first three ruls of the FORWARD chain are: Chain FORWARD (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts
2006 Feb 11
1
[Bug 439] *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x08055198 ***
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=439 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-02-11 10:31 MET ------- We generally don't
2006 Feb 03
4
[Bug 404] Packets stuck in netfilter_queue after heavy loading
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=404 ------- Additional Comments From dave@rem.homeip.net 2006-02-03 20:29 MET ------- Created an attachment (id=205) --> (https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=205&action=view) Description of "stuck packets", observations Still don't know WHY packets get stuck... -- Configure bugmail:
2003 Feb 16
2
[Bug 34] Redirecting udp packets to closed port gives bad icmp error
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |2 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org
2003 Jun 30
6
[Bug 47] conntrack breaks nfs, corrupted packets
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47 ------- Additional Comments From dg@ezcom.de 2003-06-30 16:17 ------- today i replaced my 8139too with a 3c59x and the corruptions are gone ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
2006 Feb 09
8
[Bug 440] Space in filename causes Forged DCC command from x.x.x.x: 0.0.0.0:0
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=440 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-02-09 15:51 MET ------- In the DCC Specifcication
2003 Feb 14
3
[Bug 47] conntrack breaks nfs, corrupted packets
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-14 09:14 ------- did you load iptable_nat at the time the problem with wrong-destip does happen? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
2003 Jun 22
2
[Bug 104] Bytes/packets counters sometimes give incorrect values
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-06-22 20:46 ------- Could you please try to strace your iptables and see if there is some error during the gesockopt/setsockopt system call when the erroneous counter values are returned? Thanks. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on
2006 Feb 09
1
[Bug 445] ipt_account reports: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:2063
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=445 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |opensource@intra2net.com ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-02-09 15:38 MET ------- ipt_account
2007 Feb 13
3
[Bug 505] iptables-save still doesn't like quotes
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=505 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |pablo@netfilter.org Version|CVS (please indicate |1.1.2 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net
2006 Feb 11
11
[Bug 447] iptables doesn't support multiple times the same match in one rule
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=447 Bug 447 depends on bug 440, which changed state. Bug 440 Summary: Space in filename causes Forged DCC command from x.x.x.x: 0.0.0.0:0 https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=440 What |Old Value |New Value ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 Feb 09
1
[Bug 437] restore can segfaults when restoring corrupt policy counters
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=437 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-02-09 15:32 MET ------- indeed, this looks like a
2007 Jan 11
3
[Bug 531] ip_tables.h: IPT_TABLE_MAXNAMELEN bogously #defined to XT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=531 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |kaber@trash.net ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-01-11 19:00 MET ------- Very nice catch. I guess it
2006 Aug 25
9
[Bug 503] ip_conntrack_sip , ip_nat_sip DNAT
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=503 siqhamo@newlunar.co.za changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are
2007 Jan 28
4
[Bug 536] Attempting to remove a non-empty userchain gives poor error message
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=536 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |kaber@trash.net ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-01-28 02:35 MET ------- I can reproduce this, but
2006 May 31
20
[Bug 481] tun + pptp nat helper
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=481 ------- Additional Comments From joseba.beltran@gmail.com 2006-05-31 19:09 MET ------- Many pptp nat helper users are suffering this problem: http://www.chillispot.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4118&highlight=pptp http://www.chillispot.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=958&highlight=pptp
2003 Feb 26
2
[Bug 55] ICMP translation problem with local NAT
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |2 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org
2003 Apr 17
1
[Bug 78] -m psd -j TARPIT returns all ports open from nmap
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78 ------- Additional Comments From tools@die.net 2003-04-17 15:47 ------- Showing any ports open that are sent to it is the normal function of TARPIT target. The psd match will start routing all ports to it after it decides that an IP is portscanning, so this is the expected behavior. That being said, the psd match won't
2003 Apr 19
4
[Bug 82] iptables doesn't compile if no optimization flags are set
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rusty@netfilter.org Severity|normal |minor Status|NEW
2003 Mar 06
3
[Bug 59] sparc64 conntrack issue with expecting related connections, FTP
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching