similar to: [Bug 53] Feature request - Basic Denial of Service feature

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2003-06-16 00:38 ------- problem seems to be a dropped reference in remove_expectations, can be reproduced by unloading ip_conntrack after unloading a helper which is helping a connection. Attached patch fixes my problems. ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

hi i have gone through the achieves but still could not get my bridge to suvive a reboot . please can anyone help me am using fedora core 2 -----Original message----- From: bridge-request@lists.osdl.org Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 03:08:06 +0100 To: bridge@lists.osdl.org Subject: Bridge Digest, Vol 17, Issue 25 > Send Bridge mailing list submissions to > bridge@lists.osdl.org > >

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83 outsider@key2peace.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58 email@cs-ware.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Additional Comments From email@cs-ware.de 2003-06-01

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53 Summary: Feature request - Basic Denial of Service feature Product: iptables userspace Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36 Summary: Possible SMP-race in rule handling (or other memorycorrupting thing) Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=536 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |kaber@trash.net ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-01-28 02:35 MET ------- I can reproduce this, but

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-06-30 17:12 ------- can you please try to use

This issue was identified about a month ago and a fix (by Mike) is currently in SVN...it would probably make sense to do a patch release, or even better, expedite the 2.1 release. oddsock At 09:35 AM 5/12/2004, you wrote: > > Anybody from the core can tell about the background and possible > > fixes? > > > TITLE: > > Icecast Basic Authorization Denial of Service

For those who haven't yet received this warning yet. Anybody from the core can tell about the background and possible fixes? <p>Regards, Stefan ------- Forwarded message follows ------- Date sent: Wed, 12 May 2004 13:50:17 +0200 To: secunia_security_advisories@stefan-neufeind.de Subject: [SA11578] Icecast Basic Authorization Denial of Service Vulnerability

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24 gandalf@wlug.westbo.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |outsider@key2peace.org ------- Additional Comments From gandalf@wlug.westbo.se 2003-04-23 15:57 ------- *** Bug 83

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90 Summary: RPC and RSH conntrack helpers don't use struct ip_conntrack_helper->name correctly Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic Platform: other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:05:59 +0000 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote: > On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 08:50 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > It's not really an oops, just a warning that stack space got quiet > > tight. > > > > The problem seems to be that the br netfilter code is nesting far too > > deeply and recursing several times. Looks like a design

On 9/20/19 8:58 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 9/12/19 12:41 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> We have discovered a potential Denial of Service / Amplification Attack >> in nbdkit. > > Unfortunately, our fix for this issue cause another potential Denial of > Service attack: > >> >> Lifecycle >> --------- >> >> Reported: 2019-09-11 Fixed:

TITLE: KAME Project "ipcomp6_input()" Denial of Service CRITICAL: Moderately critical IMPACT: DoS WHERE: >From remote DESCRIPTION: A vulnerability has been reported in the KAME Project, which can be exploited by malicious people to cause a DoS (Denial of Service). The vulnerability is caused due to an error within the "ipcomp6_input()" function in

Package: xen-3 Version: 3.1.0-1 Severity: grave Tags: security patch Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was published for xen-3. CVE-2007-5907[0]: | Xen 3.1.1 does not prevent modification of the CR4 TSC from | applications, which allows pv guests to cause a denial of service | (crash). CVE-2007-5906[1]: | Xen 3.1.1 allows virtual guest system users to cause a |

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: BitchX denial of service vulnerability Advisory ID: RHSA-2000:042-01 Issue date: 2000-07-06 Updated on: 2000-07-06 Product: Red Hat Powertools Keywords: DoS Cross references: N/A

Asterisk Project Security Advisory - AST-2013-002 Product Asterisk Summary Denial of Service in HTTP server Nature of Advisory Denial of Service Susceptibility Remote Unauthenticated Sessions Severity Major

Asterisk Project Security Advisory - AST-2013-002 Product Asterisk Summary Denial of Service in HTTP server Nature of Advisory Denial of Service Susceptibility Remote Unauthenticated Sessions Severity Major

There are conflicting reports about wether or not Red Hat 4.0 is vulnerable to the login-lockout described earlier. I have the impression that if you install the updates it will have been fixed. Approval of messages about this subject is now restricted to "here is a patch", and a vendors "We have made a patch available". Roger.