similar to: [Bug 24] When upgrading to 2.4.20 the owner-match doesn't work anymore.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83 outsider@key2peace.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90 Summary: RPC and RSH conntrack helpers don't use struct ip_conntrack_helper->name correctly Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic Platform: other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83 Summary: Owner matching support broken in Kernel 2.4.20 Product: iptables userspace Version: 1.2.7a Platform: i386 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36 Summary: Possible SMP-race in rule handling (or other memorycorrupting thing) Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component:

hi i have gone through the achieves but still could not get my bridge to suvive a reboot . please can anyone help me am using fedora core 2 -----Original message----- From: bridge-request@lists.osdl.org Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 03:08:06 +0100 To: bridge@lists.osdl.org Subject: Bridge Digest, Vol 17, Issue 25 > Send Bridge mailing list submissions to > bridge@lists.osdl.org > >

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90 gandalf@wlug.westbo.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2003-06-16 00:38 ------- problem seems to be a dropped reference in remove_expectations, can be reproduced by unloading ip_conntrack after unloading a helper which is helping a connection. Attached patch fixes my problems. ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58 email@cs-ware.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Additional Comments From email@cs-ware.de 2003-06-01

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |LATER ------- Additional Comments From

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94 ------- Additional Comments From gandalf@netfilter.org 2004-05-27 00:20 ------- I've just committed a bunch of fixes for 64bit kernel / 32bit userspace into cvs. Please download iptables from cvs, compile and test. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72 gandalf@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From gandalf@netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95 Summary: inverse limit match doesn't work Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Mandrake Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1168 Bug ID: 1168 Summary: type nat hook output doesn't work anymore Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: kernel Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1234 Bug ID: 1234 Summary: iptables match-set with multiple ipsets doesn't work Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables Assignee:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104 ------- Additional Comments From gandalf@netfilter.org 2004-05-29 23:45 ------- iptables calls getsockopt() twice, first with SO_GET_INFO which locks the table in kernel and returns some info and then unlocks the table, among that info is the size of the table. Then iptables allocates memory and calls getsockopt() again but

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1141 Bug ID: 1141 Summary: trace aborts using pkttype on ingress Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: kernel Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-05-31 23:25 ------- I can confirm this bug. neither libipt_limit.c nor ipt_limit.c contain any handling of inversion. Together with Bug #94, I think it's time to rewrite parts of the limit match in order to address those issues. I doubt this will be possible

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-10-08 16:44 ------- it is impossible to use this solution, since it would change the structure size between kernel and userspace. This way everybody would need to recompile the iptables userspace program, and there is no forward/backwards compatibility :(

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95 ------- Additional Comments From niels.laukens@tijd.com 2004-07-04 23:29 ------- (sorry to disturb): will this (ever) fix? is it fixed with the attachement? or won't it fix? or is there an alternative? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95 ------- Additional Comments From guru.list@xhost.cz 2004-09-15 12:19 CEST ------- Neither dstlimit works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.