similar to: [Bug 83] New: Owner matching support broken in Kernel 2.4.20

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83 outsider@key2peace.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24 gandalf@wlug.westbo.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |outsider@key2peace.org ------- Additional Comments From gandalf@wlug.westbo.se 2003-04-23 15:57 ------- *** Bug 83

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=527 Summary: the check make target has a greedy debug grep Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=469 Summary: recent match doesn't triger with --hitcount > 20 Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo:

In 2.4.20-pre5 an optimisation was made to the ext3 fsync function which can very easily cause file data corruption at unmount time. This was first reported by Nick Piggin on November 29th (one day after 2.4.20 was released, and three months after the bug was merged. Unfortunate timing) This only affects filesystems which were mounted with the `data=journal' option. Or files which are

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63 Summary: fwmark loopback routing issue Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62 Summary: I patched the iptables-restore and liblptulog for string included "," " Product: iptables userspace Version: 1.2.7a Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=570 Summary: iptables save saves broken rules for -m owner Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P1 Component: iptables-save AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org ReportedBy:

Hi list! I''m trying to run 2.4.29-xenU with grsec. Jacob Gorm Hansen said couple of weeks ago, that grsec should work with xen when pax is disabled.. Well, to get the kernel compiling there''s some source hacking that needs to be done.. I''ll describe what I did and what error I got: I downloaded xen-2.0-testing-src.tgz and extracted it. I edited the toplevel Makefile

This patch fixes an inefficiency and potential system lockup in the 2.4 kernel's ext3 filesystem. The problem has been present since 2.4.20-pre5. This patch is applicable to 2.4.20. A copy is at http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.4/2.4.20/ext3-scheduling-storm.patch Anyone who is using tasks which have realtime scheduling policy on ext3 systems should apply this change.

I am trying to run Dovecot on RH 7.3 with Linux kernel 2.4.20 + GrSecurity patch. I downloaded the RPM yesterday and installed it. When I start Dovecot the kernel reports: kernel: grsec: From 192.168.1.22: attempt to overstep process limit by (dovecot:14491) UID(0) EUID(0), parent (dovecot:23872) UID(0) EUID(0) I have never seen this problem in the 3 years I have used GrSecurity together with a

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-16 09:36 ------- you seem to be running a

--9zecZT88ylESpiZX Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="+nG9yj4eE4W6Oba0" Content-Disposition: inline --+nG9yj4eE4W6Oba0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! The netfilter coreteam proudly presents: iptables version 1.2.7a Unfortunately iptables 1.2.7, released on the website three weeks ago,

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41 Summary: pptp-conntrack-nat and sparc64 structures/padding/maskcomp bug Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic Platform: sparc64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: connection

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58 Summary: save() function of libipt_recent.c broken Product: iptables userspace Version: 1.2.7a Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56 Summary: super-long erroneous timeouts in conntrack table (semantics of list_del() change) Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: other URL: http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bowles@ambisys.com Component|unknown |ip_tables (kernel) OS/Version|other

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68 Summary: Kernel panic Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:

On 2015-02-26 17:05, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:56:50PM +0100, Olivier Mauras wrote: > >> On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 16:05 -0500, Laine Stump wrote: >> >>> On 02/24/2015 03:37 PM, Olivier Mauras wrote: >>> >>>>> Hello, I've been trying to boot a VM with the rootfs being a 9P share from the host. The VM OS is centos