similar to: [Bug 78] New: -m psd -j TARPIT returns all ports open from nmap

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78 ------- Additional Comments From tools@die.net 2003-04-17 15:47 ------- Showing any ports open that are sent to it is the normal function of TARPIT target. The psd match will start routing all ports to it after it decides that an IP is portscanning, so this is the expected behavior. That being said, the psd match won't

Has anyone been successful at using the TARPIT target in iptables under CentOS 4? I am using CentOS 4.3, fully updated with iptables-1.2.11-3.1.RHEL4 and kernel-2.6.9-34.107.plus.c4 Doing a locate on TARPIT returns: # locate TARPIT /lib/iptables/libipt_TARPIT.so This makes me think that the TARPIT target would be valid, however when I try to use it, I get the following reponse: # iptables

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1097 Bug ID: 1097 Summary: TARPIT function does not work in ip6tables Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ip6_tables (kernel) Assignee:

Hi all, I appologise in advance if this is a little OT, but I am building a box that will serve as firewall and router for a small ''internet cafe / netcafe'' and am using CentOS... So here it is: What are the best tools to be used for keeping the potential script kiddies from ''harming the Internet'' :) ? I specifically want to be able to detect and prevent

... Hello! I completed a simple userspace tarpit script: http://www.radlinux.org/connexion/browser/branches/0.4.4/lib/cxnet It is not a production solution, but an example of cxnet usage. Whilst not as fast as libnfnetlink and kernel netfilter, cxnet is extremely simple and can be used for rapid net-apps development or in GNU/Linux network studies (e.g., for educational purposes). Cxnet

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42 Summary: Kernel panic in PSD Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic Platform: i386 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org

Dear Tom, Short answer, if your using spec.pgram(), use the smoothing kernel to get a better estimate at the frequency centered in the bandwidth. If your frequency bin of interest is wider than the bandwidth of the kernel, average across frequencies (I think). The estimate appears to be normalized already. If you are calculating your PSD independently, then oversample (e.g. 2, perhaps 4 or more

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-04 11:37 ------- I've emailed this bugreport to Denis Koslowski [the author of the psd match]. Once he has opened a bugzilla account, I can assign the bug to him. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or

I made the following adjustments to /etc/shorewall/common.def (1.3.13 with all relevant patches). ############################################################################ # Shorewall 1.3 -- /etc/shorewall/common.def # # This file defines the rules that are applied before a policy of # DROP or REJECT is applied. In addition to the rules defined in this file, # the firewall will also define a

----- Forwarded message from Louis Kowolowski <louisk@bend.com> ----- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:37:42 -0700 From: Louis Kowolowski <louisk@bend.com> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: snort, postgres, bridge User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i I've been prowling through the FreeBSD and Snort list archives in search of information on setting up snort on a FreeBSD bridge(4) that logs

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com

Hi everyone, Xtables-addons 1.5.4 has been released; highlights of this release are the import, cleanup/bugfixing the "condition" and "ipp2p" matches and additionally extending the "IPMARK" by IPv6. I hope people don''t mind, but I have not heard back so far, so I take it it''s ok. LOGMARK (for analyzing packet marks and connection states) now

Dear list, What on earth is spec.pgram() normalized too? If you would like to skip my proof as to why it's not normed too the mean squared or sum squared amplitude of the discrete function a[], feel free too skip the rest of the message. If it is, but you know why it's not exact in spec.pgram() when it should be, skip the rest of this message. The issue I refer herein refers only too a

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:44:05PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote: > > Cheerio! > -slow Still reviewing this - but a few things that will need changing: When adding the validate_nt_acl_blob() function in [PATCH 06/12] vfs_acl_common: move the ACL blob validation to a helper function this makes some of the existing function names in debug statements incorrect. Eg. validate_nt_acl_blob()

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:46:12PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > > ...and this one even has bug urls in all commit messages. Sorry for > forgetting this in the previous version. Juuuusttt *one* leetle change, sorry :-). I was following the changes to the talloc heirarchy in the code and realized that adding the following change made it much clearer (at least to me). diff --git

Hello, i use shorewall for a very long time (2 years or so) and i use it for nat and as firewall....i now use portsentrys to detect portscans but there is one problem...i use the HOWTO from the shorewall mailing list to make portsentry and shorewall work together....but there is one prob portscans get detected and a drop rule is added to shorewall for example shorewall drop 62.178.xxx.xx

Dear list, I had some confusion regarding what function too use in order too relate results from spec.pgram() too a chi-square distribution. The documentation indicates that the PSD estimate can be approximated by a chi-square distribution with 2 degrees of freedom, but I am having trouble figuring out how to do it in R, and figuring out what specifically that statement in the documentation

Dear All Please be informed that I have installed CentOS 5.2 on my client but it does not have nmap command . Can you please do me favor and let me know what is the equivalent of nmap command on CentOS 5.2 ? Thank you in advance -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Ok, I''ve completely reinstalled Xen and I am still encountering the most curious problem. I set up a virtual network of eight domains: three are on a virtual DMZ network (10.0.1.0/24), four are on a virtual internal network (10.0.2.0/24), and a router connects the two. All the domains can ping each other and traceroute-ing between them shows the proper network structure (first hop:

On Sun, August 23, 2015 7:34 pm, Mark LaPierre wrote: > Hey Y'all, > > I just set up a new old machine on my network. I did a net install of > CentOS 6.7 on it replacing an outdated copy of Win XP. Of course I'm > now in the throws of configuring the machine to be a useful member of > society. > > [mlapier at peach ~]$ nmap -sn 192.168.15.0/24 > > Starting