similar to: [Bug 69] IP ID's incorrect

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |LATER ------- Additional Comments From

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69 Summary: IP ID's incorrect Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |2 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bowles@ambisys.com Component|unknown |ip_tables (kernel) OS/Version|other

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-06-22 20:46 ------- Could you please try to strace your iptables and see if there is some error during the gesockopt/setsockopt system call when the erroneous counter values are returned? Thanks. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=445 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |opensource@intra2net.com ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-02-09 15:38 MET ------- ipt_account

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=440 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-02-09 15:51 MET ------- In the DCC Specifcication

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rusty@netfilter.org Severity|normal |minor Status|NEW

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |2 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=437 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-02-09 15:32 MET ------- indeed, this looks like a

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=439 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-02-11 10:31 MET ------- We generally don't

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-04-28 08:25 ------- The misnomer is true. I

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=574 Summary: nf_conntrack_ftp.c ignores RFC 1123 regarding parentheses in FTP passive mode message 227 Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-30 21:29 ------- I can confirm this bug, it

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=445 Summary: ipt_account reports: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:2063 Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic-ng Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568 Summary: iptables-save saves option hashlimit-htable-gcinterval with error Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: iptables-save AssignedTo: