Displaying 20 results from an estimated 60000 matches similar to: "[Bug 33] Connection tracking code doesn't track the interface of the connection"
2003 Mar 04
1
[Bug 33] Connection tracking code doesn't track the interface of the connection
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33
laforge@netfilter.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From
2003 Jan 31
0
[Bug 33] New: Connection tracking code doesn't track the interface of the connection
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33
Summary: Connection tracking code doesn't track the interface of
the connection
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: linux-2.4.x
Platform: i386
OS/Version: Mandrake Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
2003 Feb 16
2
[Bug 51] Supplying more than 8 ports to connection tracking triggers unusual system behavior
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51
laforge@netfilter.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
------- Additional Comments From
2003 Aug 19
1
[Bug 105] Connection tracking table full, no new connections accepted
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105
laforge@netfilter.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |LATER
------- Additional Comments From
2003 Oct 08
1
[Bug 105] Connection tracking table full, no new connections accepted
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105
laforge@netfilter.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-10-08 16:59 -------
are you using the
2003 Jun 24
0
[Bug 105] New: Connection tracking table full, no new connections accepted
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105
Summary: Connection tracking table full, no new connections
accepted
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: linux-2.4.x
Platform: i386
OS/Version: Gentoo
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: connection
2003 Jul 16
0
[Bug 110] New: TCP connection tracking
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110
Summary: TCP connection tracking
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: patch-o-matic
Platform: All
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: connection tracking
AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org
2003 Jun 24
3
[Bug 105] Connection tracking table full, no new connections accepted
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105
------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-06-24 20:00 -------
Did you try to enlarge your connection tracking table? (Pleae read the FAQ)
Do the /proc/net/ip_conntrack entries look plausible, or are there lots of
entries with unreasonably high timeout?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
2006 Jul 25
0
[Bug 495] New: Netfilter Connection Tracking Race Condition in Kernel 2.4.x
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=495
Summary: Netfilter Connection Tracking Race Condition in Kernel
2.4.x
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: linux-2.4.x
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ip_conntrack
2003 Mar 28
0
[Bug 70] New: udp connection(snmp) not being tracked.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70
Summary: udp connection(snmp) not being tracked.
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: patch-o-matic
Platform: All
OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: connection tracking
AssignedTo:
2003 Mar 29
0
[Bug 70] udp connection(snmp) not being tracked.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70
laforge@netfilter.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
Summary|udp connection(snmp) not |udp
2002 Feb 27
0
[ANNOUNCE] Security Advisory about IRC DCC connection tracking
--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi!
It is my duty to inform you about this very unfortunate security issue
in the IRC DCC connection tracking code.
The following mail has just been sent to bugtraq, Linux Vendors have been
informed two weeks in advance in order to prepare their advisories.
2003 Jan 30
0
[Bug 32] New: ip_conntrack seems to track everything which can be very slow on HTTP
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32
Summary: ip_conntrack seems to track everything which can be very
slow on HTTP
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: linux-2.4.x
Platform: i386
OS/Version: RedHat Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P2
2003 Jan 31
0
[Bug 32] ip_conntrack seems to track everything which can be very slow on HTTP
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32
laforge@netfilter.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|blocker |enhancement
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
2006 Jun 08
5
[Bug 400] connection tracking does not work on VLANs if underlying interface is a bridge
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=400
------- Additional Comments From pila@pilasecurity.com 2006-06-08 10:03 MET -------
I had the same trouble yesterday.
It's very useful to have vlan over bridges. Think this situation:
1- You have a cluster of firewall
2- You have a DMZ net with two switches for redundancy
3- You have two nic on your firewall to connect to each
2003 Mar 03
0
[Bug 59] New: sparc64 conntrack issue with expecting related connections, FTP
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59
Summary: sparc64 conntrack issue with expecting related
connections, FTP
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: linux-2.4.x
Platform: sparc64
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
2003 Feb 03
0
[Bug 31] Interface option for SNAT and DNAT
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31
laforge@netfilter.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From
2016 Oct 06
1
[Bug 1089] New: FTP extension for connection tracking - Out of busines?
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1089
Bug ID: 1089
Summary: FTP extension for connection tracking - Out of
busines?
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380168
OS: Fedora
Status: NEW
2003 Mar 30
10
[Bug 71] dnat breaks connection tracking?
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71
------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-30 21:18 -------
First of all: You didn't even specify the particular kernel version you are
running, not even mentioning which versions of which patches you are using (if
any).
Secondly, I don't see anything strange in this setup. DNAT with FTP sessions
2006 Feb 14
0
[Bug 448] New: IPv6 conntrack does not work on a tunnel interface
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448
Summary: IPv6 conntrack does not work on a tunnel interface
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: ip_conntrack
AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org