similar to: [Bug 33] Connection tracking code doesn't track the interface of the connection

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 60000 matches similar to: "[Bug 33] Connection tracking code doesn't track the interface of the connection"

2003 Mar 04
1
[Bug 33] Connection tracking code doesn't track the interface of the connection
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From
2003 Jan 31
0
[Bug 33] New: Connection tracking code doesn't track the interface of the connection
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33 Summary: Connection tracking code doesn't track the interface of the connection Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Mandrake Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2
2003 Feb 16
2
[Bug 51] Supplying more than 8 ports to connection tracking triggers unusual system behavior
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From
2003 Aug 19
1
[Bug 105] Connection tracking table full, no new connections accepted
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |LATER ------- Additional Comments From
2003 Oct 08
1
[Bug 105] Connection tracking table full, no new connections accepted
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-10-08 16:59 ------- are you using the
2003 Jun 24
0
[Bug 105] New: Connection tracking table full, no new connections accepted
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105 Summary: Connection tracking table full, no new connections accepted Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: connection
2003 Jul 16
0
[Bug 110] New: TCP connection tracking
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110 Summary: TCP connection tracking Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: connection tracking AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org
2003 Jun 24
3
[Bug 105] Connection tracking table full, no new connections accepted
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-06-24 20:00 ------- Did you try to enlarge your connection tracking table? (Pleae read the FAQ) Do the /proc/net/ip_conntrack entries look plausible, or are there lots of entries with unreasonably high timeout? ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
2006 Jul 25
0
[Bug 495] New: Netfilter Connection Tracking Race Condition in Kernel 2.4.x
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=495 Summary: Netfilter Connection Tracking Race Condition in Kernel 2.4.x Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ip_conntrack
2003 Mar 28
0
[Bug 70] New: udp connection(snmp) not being tracked.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70 Summary: udp connection(snmp) not being tracked. Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic Platform: All OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: connection tracking AssignedTo:
2003 Mar 29
0
[Bug 70] udp connection(snmp) not being tracked.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID Summary|udp connection(snmp) not |udp
2002 Feb 27
0
[ANNOUNCE] Security Advisory about IRC DCC connection tracking
--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! It is my duty to inform you about this very unfortunate security issue in the IRC DCC connection tracking code. The following mail has just been sent to bugtraq, Linux Vendors have been informed two weeks in advance in order to prepare their advisories.
2003 Jan 30
0
[Bug 32] New: ip_conntrack seems to track everything which can be very slow on HTTP
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32 Summary: ip_conntrack seems to track everything which can be very slow on HTTP Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2
2003 Jan 31
0
[Bug 32] ip_conntrack seems to track everything which can be very slow on HTTP
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|blocker |enhancement Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|
2006 Jun 08
5
[Bug 400] connection tracking does not work on VLANs if underlying interface is a bridge
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=400 ------- Additional Comments From pila@pilasecurity.com 2006-06-08 10:03 MET ------- I had the same trouble yesterday. It's very useful to have vlan over bridges. Think this situation: 1- You have a cluster of firewall 2- You have a DMZ net with two switches for redundancy 3- You have two nic on your firewall to connect to each
2003 Mar 03
0
[Bug 59] New: sparc64 conntrack issue with expecting related connections, FTP
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59 Summary: sparc64 conntrack issue with expecting related connections, FTP Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: sparc64 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:
2003 Feb 03
0
[Bug 31] Interface option for SNAT and DNAT
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From
2016 Oct 06
1
[Bug 1089] New: FTP extension for connection tracking - Out of busines?
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1089 Bug ID: 1089 Summary: FTP extension for connection tracking - Out of busines? Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380168 OS: Fedora Status: NEW
2003 Mar 30
10
[Bug 71] dnat breaks connection tracking?
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-30 21:18 ------- First of all: You didn't even specify the particular kernel version you are running, not even mentioning which versions of which patches you are using (if any). Secondly, I don't see anything strange in this setup. DNAT with FTP sessions
2006 Feb 14
0
[Bug 448] New: IPv6 conntrack does not work on a tunnel interface
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448 Summary: IPv6 conntrack does not work on a tunnel interface Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: ip_conntrack AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org