similar to: [Bug 33] New: Connection tracking code doesn't track the interface of the connection

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |minor Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=498 Summary: RTP packets are not hitting NAT table Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=552 Summary: Strange DNAT behaviour... packet don't pass to PREROUTING and go directly in INPUT !! Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-30 21:18 ------- First of all: You didn't even specify the particular kernel version you are running, not even mentioning which versions of which patches you are using (if any). Secondly, I don't see anything strange in this setup. DNAT with FTP sessions

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=517 Summary: failed to forward packets via some interface Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: mips OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=518 Summary: failed to forward packets via some interface Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: mips OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=519 Summary: failed to forward packets via some interface Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: mips OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! It is my duty to inform you about this very unfortunate security issue in the IRC DCC connection tracking code. The following mail has just been sent to bugtraq, Linux Vendors have been informed two weeks in advance in order to prepare their advisories.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=452 Summary: DNAT to internal network don't work with source routing and 2 uplinks Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=471 Summary: UDP stream DNAT problem Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |LATER ------- Additional Comments From

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-10-08 16:59 ------- are you using the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=950 Summary: ct status Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft AssignedTo: pablo at netfilter.org ReportedBy: anarey at gmail.com Estimated Hours:

I have a dsl modem and two static IP addresses: 66.17.65.22 and 66.17.65.161. I am using the standard configuration from the Shorewall Setup Guide for multiple IP addresses and modifications suggested by the Aliased Interfaces Guide. I want to set up a shorewall 2.08 router for my home (Fedora Core 2 / kernel 2.6.8-1.521). I want share an internet connection with some pc''son a local

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763 Summary: dnat and snat not changing port numbers on sctp packets Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: NAT AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=514 Summary: Making DNAT --to-destination resolve service named of port Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables (kernel)

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=850 Summary: DNAT applied even after deleting the IP Tables DNAT Rule Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at