similar to: I'd like to donate a passively cooled 6600 (NV43)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52411 Bug #: 52411 Summary: NV43 [GeForce 6600] nouveau in linux kernel 3.4.0 to 3.4.2 hangs at boot Classification: Unclassified Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73233 Priority: medium Bug ID: 73233 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [NV43] GeForce 6600 GT nouveau on AMD-Vi triggers constant errors: Event logged IO_PAGE_FAULT QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified

Hi everyone, My name is Pascal Schoenhardt. I am working on a SOC project to add XRandR 1.2 support to GNOME, and I use a laptop with an Nvidia card. Therefore, I also use Nouveau. First of all, great work guys. I am extremely excited about this project, and I'm amazed by the progress you are making with such a difficult task. I am posting this message to report my success with the nouveau

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96460 Bug ID: 96460 Summary: NV43 [GeForce 6600 GT] shows many artifacts on a screen Product: Mesa Version: 11.2 Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: medium Component:

hello nouveau devs! I have two nvidia cards lying around that are no longer in use: * Nvidia GeForce GTS250 E-Green, 512MB GDDR3 (NV92/G92 - NV50 family) * Nvidia GeForce 6600, 256MB (NV43 - NV40 family) They both are already well supported by the nouveau driver as far as I can tell. But if any dev can make use of them, please let me know, I would gladly donate them. Patrick

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111642 Bug ID: 111642 Summary: NV43 GeForce 6600 Nouveau is not stable on legacy hardware Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: not set Priority: not set Component: Driver/nouveau

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48701 Bug #: 48701 Summary: lodbias demo displays garbage on nv43 with new driver Classification: Unclassified Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49731 Bug #: 49731 Summary: wine 1.5.2 and 3Dmark2001se on nv43 hits assertion in simplify_cmp: Assertion `inst->dst.index < 4096' failed Classification: Unclassified Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49736 Bug #: 49736 Summary: piglit quck.driver tests kill X server on nv43 Classification: Unclassified Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92386 Bug ID: 92386 Summary: Integrated sensor on nv43 doesn't work (wrong vbios parsing?) Product: xorg Version: git Hardware: x86 (IA32) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57484 Priority: medium Bug ID: 57484 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: NV43: fail resume after suspend QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: xoddark at gmail.com

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70452 Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Graphical corruption after |[NV43] Graphical corruption |resume from suspend or |after resume from suspend

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25639 Summary: NV43 (6600GT): Monitor goes blank during boot Product: xorg Version: 7.5 Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92377 Bug ID: 92377 Summary: Add support for early voltage table as seen on nv43 Product: xorg Version: git Hardware: x86 (IA32) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70452 Moi Jaiunvelo <moijaiunvelo at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |http://bugs.debian.org/7258 | |71 -- You are receiving this

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70452 --- Comment #4 from Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- Was your libdrm compiled with gcc-4.8? If so, make sure to get libdrm 2.4.48 or later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70452 --- Comment #5 from Moi Jaiunvelo <moijaiunvelo at gmail.com> --- Hi, I ignore against which gcc version my libdrm was compiled but my libdrm version is 2.4.46-3 (I run debian/testing) : Versions of packages xserver-xorg-video-nouveau depends on: ii libc6 2.17-93 ii libdrm-nouveau2

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70452 --- Comment #6 from Moi Jaiunvelo <moijaiunvelo at gmail.com> --- I tried to backport libdrm from debian/sid and it fixed the graphical corruption. More precisely for users who would like to reproduce it, I backported libdrm2, libdrm-intel1, libdrm-radeon1 and libdrm-nouveau2 from debian/sid to have them in 2.4.49-1 version. Start-Date:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70452 Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #7 from Martin Peres

The inst variable (and thus engctx) will not be properly populated for pre-NV44 cards. The dma setter method didn't need it anyways, so call it directly instead of the nv_call indirection. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- Tested on NV42. Ben, I'm going to guess that you hate this patch, since it gets rid of the beautiful nv_call stuff. However I wasn't