similar to: [Bug 29766] New: suspend-to-ram problem on GF7600 notebook

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34491 Summary: Resuming from Suspend to RAM causes poor 2D performance Product: xorg Version: 7.4 Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau

At: http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=06/05/24/1716222 are instructions for implementing suspend mode on a Linux notebook, but the script is for Gentoo and it seems like Centos needs something else. As this puts my system REALLY fast into Suspend, but it never comes back out. Further the temp file: var/tmp/video_state.XXXXXX is empty, so something is not right. Now for my system, HP

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92049 Bug ID: 92049 Summary: Suspend/resume failure on Acer Aspire V5-573G notebook Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

On 08/10/2015 07:16 PM, james harvey wrote: > How do I "enable" qemu-ga on a guest to be able to (I think this means have > a success-response:true) for: guest-suspend-hybrid; guest-suspend-ram; > guest-suspend-disk; and guest-shutdown? > "success-response":false has nothing to do with whether a guest-agent command is enabled, but rather whether you should expect

Hi, I'm bitten by a bug that is also in the Debian BTS, so I'm not sure you are aware of it. I couldn't find it in the fdo BTS. Anyway the problem is simple. After a successful suspend and resume all window decorations (the places where the shadow was supposed to be, but also the titlebars) are much to colorful (meaning it has some random colors in it). Moving the windows brings the

Hello, After bisection I found the first bad commit : 5e120f6e4b3f35b741c5445dfc755f50128c3c44 is the first bad commit commit 5e120f6e4b3f35b741c5445dfc755f50128c3c44 Author: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Date: Mon Apr 30 13:55:29 2012 +1000 drm/nouveau/fence: convert to exec engine, and improve channel sync Now have a somewhat simpler semaphore sync implementation for

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault at gmx.de> wrote: > On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 13:51 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> Some details that may be useful in analysis of the bug: >> >> 1. lspci -nn -d 10de: > > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: NVIDIA Corporation GM204 [GeForce GTX 980] [10de:13c0] (rev a1) > 01:00.1 Audio device [0403]: NVIDIA

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Mike Galbraith <efault at gmx.de> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 11:55 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: >> On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 14:22 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> > >> > Some display stuff did change for 4.13 for GM20x+ boards. If it's not >> > too much trouble, a bisect would be pretty useful. >> >> Bisection

On 7/12/17 7:19 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 07:37 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Mike Galbraith <efault at gmx.de> wrote: >>> On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 11:55 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: >>>> On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 14:22 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>>>> Some display stuff did change for 4.13 for

On 7/14/17 3:41 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 15:36 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: >>  All DRM did was to slip a >> WARN_ON_ONCE() that nouveau triggers into a kernel module where such >> things no longer warn, they blow the box out of the water. > BTW, turn that irksome WARN_ON_ONCE() in drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c > into a WARN_ONCE(), and all is

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Mike Galbraith <efault at gmx.de> wrote: > On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 17:10 +0200, Karol Herbst wrote: >> Yeah, we shouldn't let the machine die. Are there more WARN_ON_ONCE >> usage we could convert to WARN_ONCE? > > Shooting the messenger is generally considered uncool :) That's never stopped it from being a popular practice...

The conversion is a nice catch, but i'd like to have a bit more context, see below! With a better description: Tobias Klausmann <tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> On 7/14/17 5:10 PM, Karol Herbst wrote: > Yeah, we shouldn't let the machine die. Are there more WARN_ON_ONCE > usage we could convert to WARN_ONCE? > > Reviewed-By: Karol Herbst <karolherbst at

On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 17:50 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 03:36:08PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > Ok, a network outage gave me time to go hunting.  Indeed it is a bad > > interaction with the tree DRM merged into.  All DRM did was to slip a > > WARN_ON_ONCE() that nouveau triggers into a kernel module where such > > things no longer warn,

On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 14:42 -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > Does this fix it? Yup, both READONLY __bug_table and "extra stern" warning are gone. > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h > index 39e702d..aa6b202 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ > #define

+++ Peter Zijlstra [14/07/17 18:10 +0200]: >On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 05:58:18PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: >> On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 17:50 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >> > Urgh, is for some mysterious reason the __bug_table section of modules >> > ending up in RO memory? >> > >> > I forever get lost in that link magic :/ >> >> +1

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Tobias Klausmann <tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> wrote: > The conversion is a nice catch, but i'd like to have a bit more context, see > below! > > With a better description: > > Tobias Klausmann <tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> I don't think it was meant as a serious patch. WARN_ON_ONCE should work. The

On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 14:22 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > OK, thanks. So in other words, a fairly standard desktop with a PCIe > board plugged in. No funny business. (Laptops can create a ton of > additional weirdness, which I assumed you had since you were talking > about STR.) Yup, garden variety deskside box. > My best guess is that gf119_head_vblank_put either has a bogus

On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 14:22 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > Some display stuff did change for 4.13 for GM20x+ boards. If it's not > too much trouble, a bisect would be pretty useful. Bisection seemingly went fine, but the result is odd. e98c58e55f68f8785aebfab1f8c9a03d8de0afe1 is the first bad commit -Mike

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 06:33:01PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 18:10 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 05:58:18PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 17:50 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > Urgh, is for some mysterious reason the __bug_table section of modules > > > > ending

On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 17:10 +0200, Karol Herbst wrote: > Yeah, we shouldn't let the machine die. Are there more WARN_ON_ONCE > usage we could convert to WARN_ONCE? Shooting the messenger is generally considered uncool :) -Mike