similar to: [Bug 26812] New: [lbm-drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26790 Summary: Not center screen Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other URL: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver- xorg-video-nouveau/+bug/529130 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

Hi Just trying to get Your attention again ;] I'm still trying to launch SEF2000 on my wine, this time I got some debugging info on the case. I launch it from the c:\did\PROGRAM directory (I moved it so to try and keep out errors with bad dirname, spaces etc, but as tested on a windows, it works so too) with: export LC_ALL=C export LANG=C export WINEDEBUG=err+all,warn+all,fixme+all wine

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108346 Bug ID: 108346 Summary: System lagging Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

New getfb2 functionality uses drm_mode_fb_cmd2 struct to be symmetric with addfb2. Also modifies *_fb_create_handle() calls to accept a format_plane_index so that handles for each plane can be generated. Previously, many *_fb_create_handle() calls simply defaulted to plane 0 only. Signed-off-by: Joe Kniss <djmk at google.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c | 5 +-

On Sep 17, 2013, at 11:04 AM, Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com> wrote: > 1. The SD schedulers significantly impact the spill counts and the execution times for many benchmarks, but the machine instruction (MI) scheduler in 3.3 has very limited impact on both spill counts and execution times. Is this because most of you work on MI did not make it into the 3.3 release? We

Friday I enabled the inlinehint function attribute in the inliner. It mostly affects the performance of -Os compiled code. I have made some measurements on the SPEC test suite to show what it means. I made three runs of then nightly tests. The baseline represents -Os with no inlinehint: make TEST=nightly OPTFLAGS=-Os EXTRA_LOPT_OPTIONS=-inlinehint-threshold=0

Hello, I have a MANOVA model and I want to test the following hypothesis: LBM = 0 where B is the parameter estimates. Is there any function to do this in R? Cheers, Philippe -- Philippe Hup? Institut Curie, CNRS UMR 144, INSERM U900 26 rue d'Ulm 75005 Paris - France Email : Philippe.Hupe at curie.fr T?l : +33 (0)1 56 24 69 91 Fax: +33 (0)1 56 24 69 11 website :

Hi I am pinging to find out if there is any interest to mentor this proposal for GSoC this year? I've submitted a draft via the GSoC website. David, Vedant it would be great if I could get some advice on refining the goals and particulars of the implementation. The version we use internally is not performance oriented and will require refactoring. Here is a link to the draft document [1].

Hello, I am using the 'regsubsets' function (from leaps package) to get the best linear models to explain 1 variable from 1 to 5 explanatory variables (exhaustive search). Is there anyone who can tell me on which criterion is based the 'regsubsets' function ? Thank you. samuel Samuel BERTRAND Doctorant Laboratoire de Biomecanique LBM - ENSAM - CNRS UMR 8005

Hi David, > Are the data below all collected when only one function is picked for > instrumentation? Yes, here is a list of the benchmarks and selected functions. +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | blks | _Z19BlkSchlsEqEuroNoDivfffffif |

On Jul 2, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com> wrote: > Thank you for the answers! We are currently trying to test the MI scheduler. We are using LLVM 3.3 with Dragon Egg 3.3 on an x86-64 machine. So far, we have run one SPEC CPU2006 test with the MI scheduler enabled using the option -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-llvm-option='-enable-misched:true' with -O3.

Thank you for the answers! We are currently trying to test the MI scheduler. We are using LLVM 3.3 with Dragon Egg 3.3 on an x86-64 machine. So far, we have run one SPEC CPU2006 test with the MI scheduler enabled using the option -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-llvm-option='-enable-misched:true' with -O3. This enables the machine scheduler in addition to the SD scheduler. We have verified this by

dear LLVMers, I am trying to use some of the LLVM alias analyses, and I would like to check two things with you: is scev-aa being maintained in LLVM 3.7? Second question: I run cfl-aa, and I got a very small number of pointer disambiguation (no alias) with it. My results for SPEC CINT 2006 follow below. Is this low number of no alias responses something to be excepted? Below the results that I

Hello! i have some problems with my passdb backend and openladp-samba server. Logs, starting smb.conf: [2005/06/14 00:00:30, 0] smbd/server.c:main(798) smbd version 3.0.14a started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2004 [2005/06/14 00:00:30, 0] passdb/pdb_interface.c:make_pdb_methods_name(721) No builtin nor plugin backend for ldapsam found [2005/06/14 00:00:30, 1]

Hello, I am analysing several samples whose sizes are from 9 to 110. I would like to test their distribution with R, whether they are normal or not. I wonder which test for normality from R should I use . Thank you for help. Samuel Samuel BERTRAND Doctorant Laboratoire de Biomecanique LBM - ENSAM - CNRS UMR 8005 151, bd de l'Hopital 75013 PARIS Tel. +33 (0) 1 44 24 64 53 Fax +33 (0) 1

Hi David, > Hi Snehasish, thanks for writing up the proposal. > > As it stands today, path profiling still has serious scalability issue that > prevents it from being usable by any optimization passes that may benefit > from it. I agree; it would be an interesting to see how we can reduce the overheads to bring it within acceptable limits. > It will be interesting to see how

Hi Ghassan, this is very interesting, however... > We are currently working on revising a journal article that describes our work > on pre-allocation scheduling using LLVM and have some questions about LLVM's > pre-allocation scheduler. The answers to these question will help us better > document and analyze the results of our benchmark tests that compare our > algorithm with

Hi Snehasish, thanks for writing up the proposal. As it stands today, path profiling still has serious scalability issue that prevents it from being usable by any optimization passes that may benefit from it. On the other hand, sampling based approach can still be promising. For instance, LBR can potentially together with static CFG constructed from the binary can be used to form path(let)

Following is the list of fp benchmarks that fail. They all pass with -O3, but some fail with -O4. I did the test run. Thanks, Reza Estimated Estimated Base Base Base Peak Peak Peak Benchmarks Ref. Run Time Ratio Ref. Run Time Ratio -------------- ------ --------- ---------

Hi all! I've recently noticed that recent versions of LVM include RAID capabilities, so that one could presumably implement (e.g.) RAID-1 without having to use Linux Software RAID. Given the complexity of LBM, I'm wondering how practical and how safe this is (compared to Linux Software RAID), and also if anyone here knows more about it than I do (which isn't much), and especially if