similar to: [TEST REQUEST] NV50/NV8x/NV9x ctxprog and ctxvals generator

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "[TEST REQUEST] NV50/NV8x/NV9x ctxprog and ctxvals generator"

2010 Feb 24
2
[TEST REQUEST] NV50/NV8x/NV9x/NVAx ctxprog and ctxvals generator
http://0x04.net/~mwk/0001-drm-nv50-Implement-ctxprog-state-generation.patch This patch makes nouveau generate its own ctxprogs out of thin air on NV50 family cards and allows us to get rid of nvidia's firmware. It differs quite a bit from nvidia progs and needs thorough testing on as many chipsets and applications as possible, including gallium3d. Anything that works with nvidia firmware,
2009 Dec 11
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: provide ctxprog/ctxvals in ihex format
Firmware files in firmware/ directory are not expected to be in binary format. The nouveau files are in binary format, and are therefore removed when running e.g. make clean. Fix that by converting them to ihex format instead. The patch is really big as it contains the ctxprogs stuff, so I'll provide a link instead:
2010 Feb 25
3
[PATCH 1/3] drm/nv50: Implement ctxprog/state generation.
This removes dependence on external firmware for NV50 generation cards. If the generated ctxprogs don't work for you for some reason, please report it. Signed-off-by: Marcin Ko?cielnicki <koriakin at 0x04.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_graph.c | 74 +-
2010 Apr 02
1
[PATCH] drm/nv50: Add NVA3 support in ctxprog/ctxvals generator.
Signed-off-by: Marcin Ko?cielnicki <koriakin at 0x04.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_grctx.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_grctx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_grctx.c index 3c3cc46..42a8fb2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_grctx.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_grctx.c @@ -177,6 +177,7
2010 Jan 08
10
[Bug 25952] New: GeForce 9800 GTX - nouveau_init takes ~ 1 minute to complete
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25952 Summary: GeForce 9800 GTX - nouveau_init takes ~ 1 minute to complete Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: high Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at
2010 Feb 25
0
[PATCH] drm/nv50: Remove redundant/incorrect ctxvals initialisation.
11c/004 offset corresponds to PGRAPH reg 0x400828, and is initialised earlier anyway by both our ctxprog generator and blob ctxvals. It's actually incorrect with the generator, since we use different layout on pre-NVA0. Signed-off-by: Marcin Ko?cielnicki <koriakin at 0x04.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_graph.c | 4 ---- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff
2011 Oct 29
1
"enable ctxprog xfer only when we need it to save power" introduces big performance regression
Hi I've bisected pretty big performance regression (nv92): $ git bisect good b2737681d5442f05ab6419e05468c3d2511a5ced is the first bad commit commit b2737681d5442f05ab6419e05468c3d2511a5ced Author: Martin Peres <martin.peres at ensi-bourges.fr> Date: Sat Jul 30 23:08:45 2011 +0200 drm/nv50/gr: enable ctxprog xfer only when we need it to save power This patch adds
2012 Nov 11
0
[PATCH] drm/nv40: allocate ctxprog with kmalloc
Some archs defconfigs have CONFIG_FRAME_WARN set to 1024, which lead to this warning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/ctxnv40.c: warning: the frame size of 1184 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/ctxnv40.c | 12
2009 Dec 10
0
Nouveau ctxprogs (Re: [git pull] drm)
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:33:13 -0500 "C. Bergstr?m" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > Pekka Paalanen > > > The big question is what we call ctxprogs: binary blobs that are > > clearly executable, running somewhere in the GPU. No-one seems > > to know, if those are copyrightable, or if they can be > > redistributed. In their current form, they have
2010 Apr 01
1
GeForce GTS 250M: no acceleration...
Good day. I am Carlo - living in the Netherlands. Today I came in possession of a MSI-produced barebone laptop - a MS-1656-ID1 (which is equivalent in hardware to the GT640 "gaming" laptop). This laptop comes wih a video card that is identified as follows: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation GT215 [GeForce GTS 250M] (rev a2) (pci ID 10de:0ca9). For your info, the
2010 Feb 28
1
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nv50: Make ctxprog wait until interrupt handler is done.
This will fix races between generated ctxprogs and interrupt handler. Signed-off-by: Marcin Ko?cielnicki <koriakin at 0x04.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_grctx.c | 5 +++++ 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_grctx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_grctx.c index d105fcd..9f909ab 100644 ---
2010 Mar 09
72
[Bug 26980] New: GT230M/nouveau: X server hangs spontaneously
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26980 Summary: GT230M/nouveau: X server hangs spontaneously Product: xorg Version: 7.5 Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
2010 Jan 02
3
[PATCH/TESTING(all hw)/DISCUSSION] FIFO (minor) create and (major) destroy instabilities on nv50+
Many people using nv50+ hardware are aware of gpu lockups when a fifo closes under certain conditions. Based on a mmio-trace and some trail and error testing i've come up with a patch that improves the situation on my NV96. This patch needs testing on NV50+ hardware and regression testing on older hardware, since i did change some of the common codepaths. This is very much a work in progress,
2010 May 15
0
No subject
family having (several?) different video decode engine. The only work I know about is an initial support for mpeg2 decode engine on nv40 : http://cgit.freedesktop.org/nouveau/linux-2.6/commit/?h=3Dnvfx-vpe&id=3D538= d6ef8aac1cd861f6336e24e79a315fe58aba0 And afaik, the other engines are mostly unknown (no RE and no code). Some of these details could be wrong, in that case hopefully someone can
2008 Jan 30
1
R package Matrix failing to build with R-devel on Ubuntu AMD64
Switched back to R-devel tonight after using R-2.6.1 for awhile and when I updated my devel packages Matrix installation failed. Not critical for me but thought I should report it. I am using Ubuntu Gusty AMD64 OS. Tail of install output and sessionInfo follows. Mark Loading required package: methods Loading required package: lattice Attaching package: 'Matrix' The
2009 Aug 07
9
[Bug 23198] New: nv50/NVS135M: video hangs/flickers when fullscreen
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23198 Summary: nv50/NVS135M: video hangs/flickers when fullscreen Product: xorg Version: 7.3 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
2008 Oct 29
39
[Bug 18286] New: GeForce 8300 not supported (10de:0848/C77/MCP77)
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18286 Summary: GeForce 8300 not supported (10de:0848/C77/MCP77) Product: xorg Version: 7.4 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
2014 Feb 08
2
nouveau graphical corruption in 3.13.2
Hi guys, With a GeForce 320M GPU running linux 3.13.2 and Xorg 1.15.0, I'm seeing significant graphical corruption and later unrecoverable GPU lockup, accompanied by thousands of ILLEGAL_MTHD or related kernel messages [1]. I see similar issues on 3.12 also. Is there any debugging or testing I can do to help diagnose this? Many thanks, Daniel --- [1] http://quora.org/nouveau-dmesg.txt
2014 Feb 08
0
nouveau graphical corruption in 3.13.2
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Daniel J Blueman <daniel at quora.org> wrote: > Hi guys, > > With a GeForce 320M GPU running linux 3.13.2 and Xorg 1.15.0, I'm > seeing significant graphical corruption and later unrecoverable GPU > lockup, accompanied by thousands of ILLEGAL_MTHD or related kernel > messages [1]. I see similar issues on 3.12 also. > > Is there any
2002 Dec 17
1
Wine Install Question - "Registry install failed."
Mark Knecht wrote: >Hello, > First message here. I've run Wine just a little bit on another machine, >but am running Quicken 2001 Deluxe happily. (Or almost so...) > > I'm attempting to set a new version of Wine up in the office in an >attempt to move some of us here away from Windows, or at least try to. I've >installed a 12/17/02 CVS download in /source/wine