Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] nv50/gallium: use SIFC to upload to TIC/TSC"
2009 Oct 10
0
[PATCH 1/7] nv50: use SIFC for TIC, TSC upload
Add proper flushes for TIC and TSC and remove
the costly 2D.0110 flush in nv50_flush.
Correct TIC and TSC bo sizes.
---
src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_context.c | 7 ---
src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_context.h | 5 ++
src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_screen.c | 25 ++---------
src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_state_validate.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++---
2009 Oct 14
0
[PATCH] nv50/gallium: submit user vbufs through the fifo
Mesa sometimes hands us large user buffers where only a few vertices
are read from
in the drawing calls before they change again.
In such cases, allocating a new buffer from the kernel and copying all
the data takes much too long, so this patch uses NV50TCL_VERTEX_DATA to
push vertices on
the FIFO, which speeds up e.g. nexuiz quite a lot.
Additionally it gets rid of the issue that the card
2014 May 20
14
[PATCH 00/12] Cherry-pick nv50/nvc0 patches from gallium-nine
I went through the gallium-nine tree and picked out nouveau patches that are
general bug-fixes. The first bunch I'd like to also get into 10.2. I've
reviewed all of them and they make sense to me, but sending them out for
public review as well in case there are any objections.
Unless I hear objections, I'd like to push this by Friday.
Christoph Bumiller (11):
nv50,nvc0: always pull
2010 Mar 14
1
RFC: gallium/nv50: get rid of the screen_init stateobj
Hi.
There's not much to say here, just replacing the screen_init
stateobj with direct pushbuffer emission.
We don't need to store all the usless state from init, and the
constant buffer relocations which currently don't work if the
addresses change (because the method CB_DEF_SET isn't
among them (not an address)) become effective.
Thoughts, ack / nack ?
Thanks,
Christoph
2010 Mar 10
0
nv50/gallium: a few comments about latest patches
Just wanted to communicate some thoughts I had while reading the diffs,
even thought I didn't have the time to look at everything in detail yet.
- nv50: use relocs rather than re-uploading TIC all the time
It's nice that we can write relocs to arbitrary buffers, and it's much
less work than emitting the whole state object obviously.
Just, you forgot the card won't care until you
2010 Jan 05
1
Assertion failure in gallium on nv50
I upgraded mesa, libdrm, xf86-video-nouveau and the DRM module to
latest git recently (previously I had git versions from Dec 22). Now,
when I try to run a simple GL program with the DRI driver, it fails:
glxgears: /usr/include/nouveau/nouveau_pushbuf.h:135: BIND_RING:
Assertion `0' failed.
The old, previously working build of mesa and the DRI driver also
failed, which makes me think the
2009 May 18
2
[Bug 21804] New: Account Request (gallium/nouveau and xf86-video-nouveau)
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21804
Summary: Account Request (gallium/nouveau and xf86-video-nouveau)
Product: Mesa
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau
AssignedTo: nouveau at
2013 Dec 02
0
[PATCH] nv50: Fix GPU_READING/WRITING bit removal
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>
---
These look like pretty obvious typos. The x |= read; x &= ~write; (or
vice-versa) pattern occurs in nvc0, so I'm guessing that this is what was
intended here as well. Not sure if this fixes anything in particular though.
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_state_validate.c | 4 ++--
2016 Oct 27
0
[PATCH v2 5/7] nvc0: refactor TIC uploads to allow different specifics per generation
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Samuel Pitoiset
<samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you sure this refactoring doesn't break anything?
>
> Few comments inline.
>
>
> On 10/27/2016 04:02 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>
>> This flips GM10x to using the updated format, which is what I tested
>> with. However GM20x and GP10x also use this TIC format.
2009 Mar 31
1
(patch) Gallium NV50: honor bypass_vs_clip_and_viewport
When trying out the Gallium3D NV50 driver (curiosity) with a small OpenGL
program that renders 2 rotating triangles partially occluding each other
I noticed that depth buffer clearing by rendering a quad
(st_cb_clear.c/clear_with_quad) didn't work properly.
I found this was because the rasterizer state that is set by clear_with_quad
has bypass_vs_clip_and_viewport = 1 which would only be
2014 May 21
2
[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 02/12] nv50: setup scissors on clear_render_target/depth_stencil
On 21/05/14 00:39, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> From: Christoph Bumiller <e0425955 at student.tuwien.ac.at>
>
> [imirkin: add logic to also clear the "regular" scissors]
Can you please share why are you've added the "regular" scissors ?
Does it matter if we set the screen scissors before the render target params?
Thanks
Emil
> Reviewed-by: Ilia Mirkin
2009 Aug 13
9
[Bug 23291] New: A slight problem in the NV50 nouveau driver in Mesa
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23291
Summary: A slight problem in the NV50 nouveau driver in Mesa
Product: Mesa
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: medium
Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau
AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
2012 Apr 23
5
[Bug 49086] New: nouveau — Gallium 0 . 4 on NVA5 — 2 .1 Mesa 8.0.2 crashes Firefox Nightly
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49086
Bug #: 49086
Summary: nouveau ? Gallium 0.4 on NVA5 ? 2.1 Mesa 8.0.2 crashes
Firefox Nightly
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Mesa
Version: 8.0
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
2014 Jan 13
20
[PATCH 00/19] nv50: add sampler2DMS/GP support to get OpenGL 3.2
OK, so there's a bunch of stuff in here. The geometry stuff is based on the
work started by Bryan Cain and Christoph Bumiller.
Patches 01-12: Add support for geometry shaders and fix related issues
Patches 13-14: Make it possible for fb clears to operate on texture attachments
with an explicit layer set (as is allowed in gl 3.2).
Patches 15-17: Make ARB_texture_multisample work
2014 Feb 19
0
[PATCH] nv50: enable cube map array texture support
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>
---
All the arb_texture_cube_map_array piglits pass except the sampler-cube-shadow
one. However, nva0+ appear to all fail at the non-array version of that test,
sampler-cube-shadow, so I think it's very likely to be related. Probably some
sampler setup bits changed.
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_lowering_nv50.cpp | 5
2016 Oct 16
0
[PATCH 4/5] nvc0: refactor TIC uploads to allow different specifies per generation
This flips GM10x to using the updated format, which is what I tested
with. However GM20x and GP10x also use this TIC format.
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>
---
src/nvc0_accel.c | 11 ++++++++++
src/nvc0_accel.h | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/nvc0_exa.c | 22 ++++---------------
src/nvc0_xv.c | 67
2014 May 10
2
[PATCH] nv50: fix setting of texture ms info to be per-stage
Different textures may be bound to each slot for each stage. So we need
to be able to upload ms parameters for each one without stages
overwriting each other.
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>
Cc: "10.1 10.2" <mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org>
---
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_lowering_nv50.cpp | 4 ++++
2016 Oct 27
0
[PATCH v2 5/7] nvc0: refactor TIC uploads to allow different specifics per generation
This flips GM10x to using the updated format, which is what I tested
with. However GM20x and GP10x also use this TIC format.
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>
---
src/nvc0_accel.c | 11 ++++++++++
src/nvc0_accel.h | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/nvc0_exa.c | 23 ++++---------------
src/nvc0_xv.c | 67
2008 Mar 07
1
Current state - how to get gallium-stuff running?
Hi,
As the last tindc said something about 3d really working on nv4x, I wanted to
try that ( on a NV43). Built nouveau/mesa -> gallium-0.1 branch of mesa and
git head of libdrm, kernel-drm and xf86-video-nouveau.
glxinfo says:
nouveau DRI driver expected DDX version 1-1.2.x but got version 0.0.10
So I assume I need some other branch of xf86-video-nouveau (?)
I asked in irc but was pointed
2016 Oct 17
0
[PATCH 4/5] nvc0: refactor TIC uploads to allow different specifies per generation
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:46 AM, Samuel Pitoiset
<samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote:
> Few comments below.
>
> On 10/16/2016 09:14 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>
>> This flips GM10x to using the updated format, which is what I tested
>> with. However GM20x and GP10x also use this TIC format.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>