similar to: First Shoot, many more to appear: Rails on Ruby 1.9

Hello Guys, I''m reviewing the code for 1.9, and forgot about this when we first spoke on this subject. The current way we stop threads is using Thread#raise to spread StopServer exception, which will not work as expected in 1.9. 1.9 will treat raised exceptions as #kill, like JRuby does, so the worker threads will not finish serving the client and _then_ exiting, but will be

Hey so, People are asking about Mongrel Ruby 1.9 compatibility. Isn''t the point of 1.9 for library developers to have time to get ready for 2.0? It''s not like 1.9 is a production release. Evan -- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC

Hi all, There is a bug with Mongrel on JRuby 1.0.3 that the JRuby guys want fixed before they release it. If it''s ok with people I''d like to fix that, revert (at least for now) the proxy response change, and tag that as 1.1.2 and release it. Anything wrong with this plan? Evan -- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC

Hello Guys, I''ll like to suggest a small release fix before we start doing big changes: platform fixes. Current we''re setting MSWIN32 (mswin32) as platform for Windows gem, but we should be using Gem::Platform::CURRENT instead (i386-mswin32 as current Ruby windows implementation). Also, the jruby/java platform need to be defined. That change will ease the compatibility path

Hey Zed- I had a user with an app that was leaking memory with mongrel but not lighty/fcgi. I have been doing anything I can to track it down. I already did the Mutex patch to use unshitf and pop instead of shift and push and it didn''t really help much. The mem leak only really shows up when you use the wsess option to httperf. The other day I saw a ruby C extension that

Hi all, I''m trying to run a Story Runner integration test that uploads a file through Attachment-fu. I''ve tried various ways of specifying the file data, from custom mocks: class MockFile < Struct.new (:original_filename, :read, :content_type); end fdata = MockFile.new "test_upload.txt", "Test Upload", "text/plain" to

What wrong: # rails test /var/lib/gems/1.9.0/gems/activesupport-2.3.2/lib/active_support/core_ext/uri.rb:8:in `<top (required)>'': uninitialized constant URI::Parser (NameError) from /var/lib/gems/1.9.0/gems/activesupport-2.3.2/lib/active_support/core_ext.rb:3:in `require'' from /var/lib/gems/1.9.0/gems/activesupport-2.3.2/lib/active_support/core_ext.rb:3:in `block in

Can''t install the latest mongrel (1.1.5) in JRuby (jruby revisions ranging from 6600 to 6750[trunk] checked) -- the platform is not being identified and it''s trying to do native compilation. I''m not sure it''s actually a problem with Mongrel or JRuby however -- perhaps there isn''t a mongrel-1.1.5-java.gem on rubyforge? Some investigation below: $

Hi, I just did a clean install of Ruby 1.8.5 Rubygems 0.9.0 and the Mongrel and Mongrel_Cluster gems. I used only the Debian Etch package manager, nothing compiled myself. Now, on a testapp when I do a script/server, I get the: ** Ruby version is not up-to-date; loading cgi_multipart_eof_fix warning. But it''s not serving my app. Ruby is immediately on 100% CPU load (and 0.7%

Howdy Folks, This release is after painstaking analysis of a memory leak that was reported by Bradley Taylor, reduced by myself, and then fixed after much work. You should all thank Bradley for finding the bizarre fix. It turns out the Ruby has a memory leak when you use pretty much any thread locking primitive other than Sync (Mutex, Monitor, etc.): http://pastie.caboo.se/10194 The fix (for

Hi Zed, I checked in a pure-Ruby URI classifier to Mongrel trunk. Ola''s Java port of the TST had some bug, and I don''t think it''s necessary in the first place. The Ruby classifier is around 25 lines instead of the 400-odd lines for the C extension and the 200-odd for the Java extension. It uses a Regexp which is perhaps shady: @matcher = Regexp.new(routes.map do

Hi all, I feel like I''m missing something really easy and I''m just not seeing it. I''m using the restful_authentication plugin and have a User model. Uesr has_many :things and Thing belongs_to :user. That''s it. I did a "script/generate rspec_scaffold thing" to generate all the necessary bits. The "rake db:migrate" to create the db. At

Hello Mongrel Users, I''m writing a web server called Ebb. It''s written in C, makes use of the Mongrel HTTP parser, and uses libev its event loop. The goal is to be small, fast, and language independent server that can host web frameworks. I have written a small Ruby binding which provides a Rack handler - this will allow Ebb to host Rails, Merb, and other Ruby frameworks. In the

Hi, A quick search didn''t explain what fastthread is, and how it relates to mongrel. Why would I want to install fastthread? Thanks, Joe

hello list, yesterday i installed a fresh rails installation with a proper upgrade of gem to version 1.0.1 i saw, there is still a gem package to support postgresql known as postgres-0.7.9.2008.01.09 on rubyforge, its the newest one of stable postgres support for ruby additionally i installed, of course, a the postgres database on my machine to C:\Programme\PostgreSQL\8.2 after setting up a new

Hey all - I''ve got a question that I haven''t seen addressed anywhere and was wondering if anyone has put any thought into it or not... Here''s my setup... I have several *small* sites running apache/mongrel. Each has a single mongrel instance. Most don''t get any traffic (no one reads my blog :). And I was thinking, I could host a couple of more

In the root of a rails 3 app: $ rails env: ruby1.9: No such file or directory $ script/rails env: ruby1.9: No such file or directory $ script/rails generate env: ruby1.9: No such file or directory $ ruby -v ruby 1.9.1p378 (2010-01-10 revision 26273) [i386-darwin10.2.0] $ mate script/rails #!/usr/bin/env ruby1.9 --> #!/usr/bin/env ruby -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Hello Guys. I''m upgrading a project from 0.9.8 to 1.0.8, following this procedure: * Removed vendor/plugins/rspec* completely. * installed rspec and rspec_on_rails from svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/rspec/tags/REL_1_0_8 * Run script/generate rspec to update spec_helper and spec.opts Now, when running rake, get the following error: superclass mismatch for class Annotation The following

On 5/28/07, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote: > The behaviour you''re trying to describe is that the User should > require that passwords bear certain qualities - in this case a length > between 5 and 40. So you need to ask yourself how the User should > behave when this requirement is violated, and then specify that it > behaves that way. > >

Hello Everyone, I''d like to just officially announce that the new volunteers are in charge and given control of the project. I won''t be doing anything more than helping them get ramped up, but they''ll be in charge of doing all the stuff you folks want and are basically the owners from now on. Everyone in the new volunteer list will probably do a little announce, but