similar to: 1.1.2

Hey so, People are asking about Mongrel Ruby 1.9 compatibility. Isn''t the point of 1.9 for library developers to have time to get ready for 2.0? It''s not like 1.9 is a production release. Evan -- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC

FYI. -- - Brian Gupta http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/

Hello Guys, I''ll like to suggest a small release fix before we start doing big changes: platform fixes. Current we''re setting MSWIN32 (mswin32) as platform for Windows gem, but we should be using Gem::Platform::CURRENT instead (i386-mswin32 as current Ruby windows implementation). Also, the jruby/java platform need to be defined. That change will ease the compatibility path

Hi Zed, I checked in a pure-Ruby URI classifier to Mongrel trunk. Ola''s Java port of the TST had some bug, and I don''t think it''s necessary in the first place. The Ruby classifier is around 25 lines instead of the 400-odd lines for the C extension and the 200-odd for the Java extension. It uses a Regexp which is perhaps shady: @matcher = Regexp.new(routes.map do

Hello Guys, I''m reviewing the code for 1.9, and forgot about this when we first spoke on this subject. The current way we stop threads is using Thread#raise to spread StopServer exception, which will not work as expected in 1.9. 1.9 will treat raised exceptions as #kill, like JRuby does, so the worker threads will not finish serving the client and _then_ exiting, but will be

I''m running jruby trunk which has integrated rubygems 1.0.0 and when I try and install mongrel with gem it blows up when the fastthread dependency tries to do a native compilation. I couldn''t find a copy of the gemspec in the svn checkout but looking at the one installed when gem installing mongrel didn''t show any platform differentiation. There is platform

Dear Mongrels, The same questions keep coming up over and over on the list, which is ok, but not really optimal. If we added a wiki to the Mongrel site to handle FAQs, what wiki should it be? Required features would be: * Spam protection * Doesn''t look shitty I would probably spring for Trac (and also migrate the bugtracker) if noone else has opinions, but I''m sure some of

I just found a vulnerability in one of my web apps that was running Mongrel 1.1.2 where I could go to URIs like /.%252e/.%252e/.%252e/.%252e/.%252e/.%252e/.%252e/etc/passwd and it would serve the actual /etc/passwd file. The issue seems to be in lib/mongrel/handlers.rb in the change from 1.0.3 to 1.0.4 req_path = HttpRequest.unescape(path_info) - if @path - req_path =

I''m confused. Wasn''t threading fixed in 1.8.6, negating the need for fastthread? Why is fastthread still a requirement of Mongrel? Just curious. :)

I seem to have a (recent) problem with mongrel on NetBSD. I''m running a development release of NetBSD (called NetBSD-current 4.99.34). When I start mongrel, it listens on the IPv6 wildcard address, but not on the IPv4 wildcard: => Booting Mongrel (use ''script/server webrick'' to force WEBrick) => Rails application starting on http://0.0.0.0:3000 => Call with

Can''t install the latest mongrel (1.1.5) in JRuby (jruby revisions ranging from 6600 to 6750[trunk] checked) -- the platform is not being identified and it''s trying to do native compilation. I''m not sure it''s actually a problem with Mongrel or JRuby however -- perhaps there isn''t a mongrel-1.1.5-java.gem on rubyforge? Some investigation below: $

Hello Mongrels, Building on the last messages about Fastthread, can we get a detailed survey of the different ways people are deploying their applications? It will help with near-future Mongrel development. Please include the following things: * Framework, if any (Camping, Merb, Rails, Nitro, Ramaze, IOWA, Rack...) * Mongrel version * Mongrel handlers used (rails, dirhandler, camping,

Hi all, 1.0.2 final will drop as soon as I get the win32 builds from Luis. Watch for it. In the future we won''t do RCs but will just make point releases, because no one really installed them except for ourselves. This is what Zed used to do and what we should have done all along. Note that the bug tracker is empty:

Guys, Subject says everything: http://www.frederico-araujo.com/2007/12/18/my-first-successful-booting-rails-2-0-2-ruby-1-9-attempt Even ActionView uses Proc.binding (which isn''t correctly supported in 1.9) it appears that lot of folks will try to put their hands in Ruby 1.9 when it comes out, and of course, try to get Rails with Mongrel running in it. Zed, Wayne, Evan and ry: maybe we

Hi list, I downloaded and tried to install Mongrel (latest stable version) from the -win32 gem. Platform is Win2K. It said it needed daemons so got and installed that. Then it said it needed cgi_multipart_eol_fix (I think that was the name, not at my machine now, can confirm later and repost if needed). Googled for that but couldn''t find it. (Don''t have net connectivitity for a

Hello Mongrels, Release candidates for Mongrel 1.0.2 and its dependencies are now available. Note that gems are now signed, so please add the Mongrel public certificate via: $ wget http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/25325/mongrel-public_cert.pem $ gem cert --add mongrel-public_cert.pem Now you can verify and install the candidates via gem install: $ sudo gem install mongrel

Hello Everyone, Been head down with personal stuff, but I wanted to shoot out this email saying that I''ve collected the list of volunteers and decided that I''d just hand the keys over to them and see how they do. The list of people I have so far is: Ezra Zygmuntowicz <ezmobius at gmail.com> "Kirk Haines" <wyhaines at gmail.com> "Wayne E. Seguin"

Guys, Just for fun, I tried to see (I know, a silly way to test it) how much overhead we have calling the C functions of the extensions. the benchmark script and the results: http://pastie.caboo.se/128646 The naive C extension: http://pastie.caboo.se/128647 I compared 1.8.6 (VC6 and mingw builds) against a fresh checkout of ruby trunk. What I understand from that is 1.9 is slower than 1.8

Hello Mongrels, Mongrel 1.1 is out with fullblown JRuby support, some reorganization, and some bugfixes. Also, Mongrel_cluster has been updated to 1.0.4. Go subscribe to the all-new news feed, because we probably won''t announce to the list anymore: http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/rss.xml Thanks Evan, and the Mongrel Team -- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC

Hi Mongrels, Anyone used Packet? http://rubyforge.org/projects/packet It''s a pure-Ruby (I think) evented framework. It might offer a nice way forward for 1.9''s system threads, JRuby, and Windows, all at once. Mongrel''s green thread queue doesn''t have a lot of life left in it. Evan -- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC