Vasudev Ram
2007-Jun-27 17:12 UTC
[Mongrel] Q on cgi_multipart_eol_fix preqequisite for Mongrel on Win2K
Hi list, I downloaded and tried to install Mongrel (latest stable version) from the -win32 gem. Platform is Win2K. It said it needed daemons so got and installed that. Then it said it needed cgi_multipart_eol_fix (I think that was the name, not at my machine now, can confirm later and repost if needed). Googled for that but couldn''t find it. (Don''t have net connectivitity for a while - problems with brain-dead ISPs where I live - so can''t do remote gem installs with --include-dependencies- have to download the gem and its prerequisites manually and install them). Any ideas? Thanks Vasudev ========================="1 person in 100 understand binary. The other 11 don''t." Vasudev Ram http://www.dancingbison.com http://jugad.livejournal.com http://sourceforge.net/projects/xtopdf =========================-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/attachments/20070627/8646386c/attachment.html
Vasudev Ram
2007-Jun-27 17:17 UTC
[Mongrel] Q on cgi_multipart_eol_fix preqequisite for Mongrel on Win2K
P.S. 3 points more: 1. Actually it is _eof_fix, sorry. 2. When I Googled earlier I *did* get some hits, but they all seemed to be for Gentoo packages referring to the fix. So didnt''t try to check them out since I''m on Windows. 3. Googled again just now and saw this post: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/2007-February/002895.html but not sure if I can use the info it it as I''m not on the Net on my PC. - Vasudev On 6/27/07, Vasudev Ram <vasudevram at gmail.com> wrote:> > > Hi list, > > I downloaded and tried to install Mongrel (latest stable version) from the > -win32 gem. Platform is Win2K. > It said it needed daemons so got and installed that. Then it said it > needed cgi_multipart_eol_fix (I think that was the name, not at my machine > now, can confirm later and repost if needed). Googled for that but couldn''t > find it. > (Don''t have net connectivitity for a while - problems with brain-dead ISPs > where I live - so can''t do remote gem installs with --include-dependencies- > have to download the gem and its prerequisites manually and install them). > Any ideas? > > Thanks > Vasudev > =========================> "1 person in 100 understand binary. The other 11 don''t." > Vasudev Ram > http://www.dancingbison.com > http://jugad.livejournal.com > http://sourceforge.net/projects/xtopdf > =========================> >-- ========================="1 person in 100 understand binary. The other 11 don''t." Vasudev Ram http://www.dancingbison.com http://jugad.livejournal.com http://sourceforge.net/projects/xtopdf =========================-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/attachments/20070627/dfd45300/attachment.html
Luis Lavena
2007-Jun-27 17:24 UTC
[Mongrel] Q on cgi_multipart_eol_fix preqequisite for Mongrel on Win2K
On 6/27/07, Vasudev Ram <vasudevram at gmail.com> wrote:> > Hi list, > > I downloaded and tried to install Mongrel (latest stable version) from the > -win32 gem. Platform is Win2K. > It said it needed daemons so got and installed that.Wait a second: if It asked about daemons, is not win32 gem... is the ruby version.> Then it said it needed > cgi_multipart_eol_fix (I think that was the name, not at my machine now, can > confirm later and repost if needed). Googled for that but couldn''t find it.cgi_multipart_eol_fix is available via rubygems too, are you doing a manual install? If so, then I will suggest use --ignore-dependencies in ''gem install'': gem install "gem-name.gem" --ignore-dependencies> (Don''t have net connectivitity for a while - problems with brain-dead ISPs > where I live - so can''t do remote gem installs with --include-dependencies- > have to download the gem and its prerequisites manually and install them). > Any ideas? >Sorry, wrote the text before read the whole mail :-P mongrel-1.0.1-win32.gem cgi_multipart_eol_fix-0.2.1.gem (guess thats the version). mongrel_service-0.3.2-win32.gem (if you plan run mongrel as service). win32-service-0.5.2-win32.gem (if you need mongrel_service). Guess thats everything. -- Luis Lavena Multimedia systems - Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that is worthwhile. Vince Lombardi
Evan Weaver
2007-Jun-27 21:56 UTC
[Mongrel] Q on cgi_multipart_eol_fix preqequisite for Mongrel on Win2K
cgi_multipart_eof_fix is here: http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=2835 if you need to download it manually. I''ve been maintaining it rather than the Mongrel team since after version 1.0. Evan On 6/27/07, Luis Lavena <luislavena at gmail.com> wrote:> On 6/27/07, Vasudev Ram <vasudevram at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi list, > > > > I downloaded and tried to install Mongrel (latest stable version) from the > > -win32 gem. Platform is Win2K. > > It said it needed daemons so got and installed that. > > Wait a second: > > if It asked about daemons, is not win32 gem... is the ruby version. > > > Then it said it needed > > cgi_multipart_eol_fix (I think that was the name, not at my machine now, can > > confirm later and repost if needed). Googled for that but couldn''t find it. > > cgi_multipart_eol_fix is available via rubygems too, are you doing a > manual install? > > If so, then I will suggest use --ignore-dependencies in ''gem install'': > > gem install "gem-name.gem" --ignore-dependencies > > > (Don''t have net connectivitity for a while - problems with brain-dead ISPs > > where I live - so can''t do remote gem installs with --include-dependencies- > > have to download the gem and its prerequisites manually and install them). > > Any ideas? > > > > Sorry, wrote the text before read the whole mail :-P > > mongrel-1.0.1-win32.gem > cgi_multipart_eol_fix-0.2.1.gem (guess thats the version). > mongrel_service-0.3.2-win32.gem (if you plan run mongrel as service). > win32-service-0.5.2-win32.gem (if you need mongrel_service). > > Guess thats everything. > > -- > Luis Lavena > Multimedia systems > - > Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, > which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that > is worthwhile. > Vince Lombardi > _______________________________________________ > Mongrel-users mailing list > Mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users >-- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC
Zed A. Shaw
2007-Jun-27 23:16 UTC
[Mongrel] Q on cgi_multipart_eol_fix preqequisite for Mongrel on Win2K
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:56:30 -0400 "Evan Weaver" <evan at cloudbur.st> wrote:> cgi_multipart_eof_fix is here: http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=2835 > if you need to download it manually. > > I''ve been maintaining it rather than the Mongrel team since after version 1.0.You want access to the Mongrel project so you can maintain it? Just gotta ask. -- Zed A. Shaw - Hate: http://savingtheinternetwithhate.com/ - Good: http://www.zedshaw.com/ - Evil: http://yearofevil.com/
Evan Weaver
2007-Jun-28 01:52 UTC
[Mongrel] Q on cgi_multipart_eol_fix preqequisite for Mongrel on Win2K
Na I just kind of put it up there, as a regular installable gem, since you hadn''t.... didn''t think you were shutting me out or anything. But thanks. Evan On 6/27/07, Zed A. Shaw <zedshaw at zedshaw.com> wrote:> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:56:30 -0400 > "Evan Weaver" <evan at cloudbur.st> wrote: > > > cgi_multipart_eof_fix is here: http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=2835 > > if you need to download it manually. > > > > I''ve been maintaining it rather than the Mongrel team since after version 1.0. > > You want access to the Mongrel project so you can maintain it? Just gotta ask. > > -- > Zed A. Shaw > - Hate: http://savingtheinternetwithhate.com/ > - Good: http://www.zedshaw.com/ > - Evil: http://yearofevil.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Mongrel-users mailing list > Mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users >-- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC
Zed A. Shaw
2007-Jun-28 18:06 UTC
[Mongrel] Q on cgi_multipart_eol_fix preqequisite for Mongrel on Win2K
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:52:32 -0400 "Evan Weaver" <evan at cloudbur.st> wrote:> Na I just kind of put it up there, as a regular installable gem, since > you hadn''t.... didn''t think you were shutting me out or anything. But > thanks.Thanks man. I don''t remember you ever telling me you were doing this but, whatever. I''m sure you''ve got a reason for maintaining it. So, looking at the gem you''ve got the copyright wrong: Copyright 2006, 2007 Cloudburst, LLC. Portions copyright 2006 Zed A. Shaw, Yukihiro Matsumoto and used with permission. Licensed under the AFL 3.0. It wasn''t copyright me, it was actually written by Jeremy Kemper and/or Jamis Buck. I believe Jeremy wrote the fix and Jamis packaged it then fed it to me on the down-low so I could roll it out. Also, double check the original gem because I believe it''s actually MIT or Ruby licensed, not AFL. Utimately though, this has got to go. I''m gonna ask around to see if this can be dropped and then I''ll do a new release of Mongrel making it not required. This really shouldn''t be my or your problem at all. Ruby guys should do proper security fixes in a timely manner so that all Ruby users do an upgrade instead of leaving it to us to put in weird back patching crap. -- Zed A. Shaw - Hate: http://savingtheinternetwithhate.com/ - Good: http://www.zedshaw.com/ - Evil: http://yearofevil.com/
Evan Weaver
2007-Jun-28 18:59 UTC
[Mongrel] Q on cgi_multipart_eol_fix preqequisite for Mongrel on Win2K
Yeah; I''ve been waiting for you to drop it since 1.8.6 was released. I''ll update the copyright. Evan On 6/28/07, Zed A. Shaw <zedshaw at zedshaw.com> wrote:> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:52:32 -0400 > "Evan Weaver" <evan at cloudbur.st> wrote: > > > Na I just kind of put it up there, as a regular installable gem, since > > you hadn''t.... didn''t think you were shutting me out or anything. But > > thanks. > > Thanks man. I don''t remember you ever telling me you were doing this but, whatever. I''m sure you''ve got a reason for maintaining it. > > So, looking at the gem you''ve got the copyright wrong: > > Copyright 2006, 2007 Cloudburst, LLC. Portions copyright 2006 Zed A. Shaw, > Yukihiro Matsumoto and used with permission. Licensed under the AFL 3.0. > > It wasn''t copyright me, it was actually written by Jeremy Kemper and/or Jamis Buck. I believe Jeremy wrote the fix and Jamis packaged it then fed it to me on the down-low so I could roll it out. > > Also, double check the original gem because I believe it''s actually MIT or Ruby licensed, not AFL. > > Utimately though, this has got to go. I''m gonna ask around to see if this can be dropped and then I''ll do a new release of Mongrel making it not required. This really shouldn''t be my or your problem at all. Ruby guys should do proper security fixes in a timely manner so that all Ruby users do an upgrade instead of leaving it to us to put in weird back patching crap. > > -- > Zed A. Shaw > - Hate: http://savingtheinternetwithhate.com/ > - Good: http://www.zedshaw.com/ > - Evil: http://yearofevil.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Mongrel-users mailing list > Mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users >-- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC
Zed A. Shaw
2007-Jun-28 19:44 UTC
[Mongrel] Q on cgi_multipart_eol_fix preqequisite for Mongrel on Win2K
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:59:58 -0400 "Evan Weaver" <evan at cloudbur.st> wrote:> Yeah; I''ve been waiting for you to drop it since 1.8.6 was released. > I''ll update the copyright.Not everyone has 1.8.6 and if that''s the case then why are you actually maintaining this and making releases? If there''s new security holes you have fixed in this then are they also fixed in the 1.8.6 release? -- Zed A. Shaw - Hate: http://savingtheinternetwithhate.com/ - Good: http://www.zedshaw.com/ - Evil: http://yearofevil.com/
Evan Weaver
2007-Jun-28 20:01 UTC
[Mongrel] Q on cgi_multipart_eol_fix preqequisite for Mongrel on Win2K
Yes, the second hole is fixed in 1.8.6 but not previous. On 6/28/07, Zed A. Shaw <zedshaw at zedshaw.com> wrote:> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:59:58 -0400 > "Evan Weaver" <evan at cloudbur.st> wrote: > > > Yeah; I''ve been waiting for you to drop it since 1.8.6 was released. > > I''ll update the copyright. > > Not everyone has 1.8.6 and if that''s the case then why are you actually maintaining this and making releases? If there''s new security holes you have fixed in this then are they also fixed in the 1.8.6 release? > > -- > Zed A. Shaw > - Hate: http://savingtheinternetwithhate.com/ > - Good: http://www.zedshaw.com/ > - Evil: http://yearofevil.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Mongrel-users mailing list > Mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users >-- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC
Vasudev Ram
2007-Jun-29 14:33 UTC
[Mongrel] Q on cgi_multipart_eol_fix preqequisite for Mongrel on Win2K
Thanks to all those who replied. I got the cgi...fix gem and the other gems, will try things out now. - Vasudev> Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:42:00 +0530 > From: "Vasudev Ram" <vasudevram at gmail.com> > Subject: [Mongrel] Q on cgi_multipart_eol_fix preqequisite for Mongrel > on Win2K > To: mongrel-users at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: > <c958c2e70706271012w73c43acak8d8a6cd79a9cdc05 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi list, > > I downloaded and tried to install Mongrel (latest stable version) from the > -win32 gem. Platform is Win2K. > It said it needed daemons so got and installed that. Then it said it > needed > cgi_multipart_eol_fix (I think that was the name, not at my machine now, > can > confirm later and repost if needed). Googled for that but couldn''t find > it. > (Don''t have net connectivitity for a while - problems with brain-dead ISPs > where I live - so can''t do remote gem installs with > --include-dependencies- > have to download the gem and its prerequisites manually and install them). > Any ideas? > > Thanks > Vasudev > =========================> "1 person in 100 understand binary. The other 11 don''t." > Vasudev Ram > http://www.dancingbison.com > http://jugad.livejournal.com > http://sourceforge.net/projects/xtopdf > =========================>-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/attachments/20070629/3852dca5/attachment.html