similar to: saving sublist lda object with save.image()

Greetings R experts, I am running a simple lda on some simulation data of mine to show an illustration of my multivariate response data, since it is a simulation I have a very large amount of data and the default on plot seems to plot the category names. This is very difficult to interpret even changing the abbreviations. At the expense of sounding naive, my question(s) are: How can I color code

Hi! The kernlab function kpca() mentions that new observations can be transformed by using predict. Theres also an example in the documentation, but as you can see i am getting an error there (As i do with my own data). I'm not sure whats wrong at the moment. I haven't any predict functions written by myself in the workspace either. I've tested it with using the matrix version and the

Hi list, One of my co-workers found this problem with 'cor' in his code and I confirm it too (see below). He's using R 2.2.1 under Win 2K and I'm using R 2.3.0 under Win XP. =========================================== > R.Version() $platform [1] "i386-pc-mingw32" $arch [1] "i386" $os [1] "mingw32" $system [1] "i386, mingw32" $status

Hello, I'll use part of the iris dataset for an example of what I want to do. > data(iris) > iris<-iris[1:10,1:4] > iris Sepal.Length Sepal.Width Petal.Length Petal.Width 1 5.1 3.5 1.4 0.2 2 4.9 3.0 1.4 0.2 3 4.7 3.2 1.3 0.2 4 4.6 3.1 1.5

Dear all, I have a script about iteration classification, like this below data(iris) N <- 5 ir.tr.iter <- vector('list',N) ir.tr <- vector('list',N) for (j in 1:N) { ir.tr[[j]] <- rpart(Species ~., data=iris) ir.tr.iter[j] <- ir.tr[[j]]$frame result <- list(ir.tr=ir.tr, ir.tr.iter=ir.tr.iter) } as.data.frame(as.matrix(ir.tr.iter))

Dear all I know that the R way of documenting things is to work on your project in package development mode, and document each object (such as data frames) in a *.Rd files. This should work for gurus. What about a simpler way to document things, geared for mere mortals? I was thinking of a label() or tag() function that could store and retrieve an alphanumeric comment for a given object (for

Dear all What is the easy way to drop a variable by using its name (and not its number)? Example: > data(iris) > head(iris) Sepal.Length Sepal.Width Petal.Length Petal.Width Species 1 5.1 3.5 1.4 0.2 setosa 2 4.9 3.0 1.4 0.2 setosa 3 4.7 3.2 1.3 0.2 setosa 4 4.6 3.1

Hi, [I sent this to the plyr mailing list (late) last night, but it seems to be lost in the moderation queue, so here's a shot to the broadeR community] Apologies in advance for being more verbose than necessary, but I'm not even sure how to ask this question in the context of plyr, so ... here goes. As meaningless as this might be to do with the `iris` data, the spirit of it is what

Dear all The trouble with the current duplicated() function in is that it can report duplicates while searching fromFirst _or_ fromLast, but not both ways. Often users will want to identify and extract all the copies of the item that has duplicates, not only the duplicates themselves. To take the example from the man page: > data(iris) > iris[duplicated(iris), ] ##duplicates while

I am making a battery of levelplots and wireframes for several fitted models. I wrote a function that takes the fitted model object as the sole argument and produces these plots. Various strange behavior ensued, but I have identified one very concrete issue (illustrated below): when my figure-drawing function includes the addition of points/lines to trellis plots, some of the

Dear R developers Would you consider adding a 'data.frame' method for the base::rep function? The need to replicate a df row-wise can easily arise while programming, and rep() is unable to handle such a case. See below. > x <- iris[1, ] > x Sepal.Length Sepal.Width Petal.Length Petal.Width Species 1 5.1 3.5 1.4 0.2 setosa > rep(x, 2)

Hello, I am puzzled by the behavior of hist() when generating multiple plots per page on the pdf device. In the following example two pdf files are generated. The first results in 4 plots on one pdf page as expected. However, the second, which swaps one of the plot() calls for hist(), results in a 4 page pdf with one plot per page. How might I get the histogram with 3 other scatter

Hi Dieter and R community: I tried both of these three versions with ylim as suggested, none work: I am getting only single (pch = 16) not overlayed (pch =3) everytime. *vs 1* require(lattice) xyplot(Sepal.Length ~ Sepal.Width | Species , data= iris, panel= function(x, y, subscripts) { panel.xyplot(x, y, pch=16, col = "green4", ylim = c(0, 10)) panel.lmline(x, y, lty=4, col =

Dear all I have a simple problem which I thought is easy to solve but what I tried did not work. I want to change character variables to factor in data frame. It goes easily from factor to character, but I am stuck in how to do backwards conversion. Here is an example irisf<-iris irisf[,2]<-factor(irisf[,2]) # create second factor str(irisf) 'data.frame': 150 obs. of 5

Hi, I tried several settings by using the "family=gaussian" in "gl1ce", but none of them works. For the case "glm" can work. Here is the error message I got: > glm(Petal.Width~Sepal.Length+Sepal.Width+Petal.Length ,data=iris,family=gaussian()) > gl1ce(Petal.Width~Sepal.Length+Sepal.Width+Petal.Length ,data=iris,family=gaussian()) Error in eval(expr, envir,

I would like to create a tree model with at most one split point per variable using tree, rpart or other routine. Its OK if a variable enters at more than one node but if it does then all splits for that variable should be at the same point. The idea is that I want to be able to summarize the data as binary factors with the chosen split points. I don't want to have three level or more

In using cor(data.frame), it is annoying that you have to explicitly filter out non-numeric columns, and when you don't, the error message is misleading: > cor(iris) Error in cor(iris) : missing observations in cov/cor In addition: Warning message: In cor(iris) : NAs introduced by coercion It would be nicer if stats:::cor() did the equivalent *itself* of the following for a data.frame:

Dear R Developers I'm using the great randomForest package (4.6-7) for many projects and recently stumbled upon a problem when I wrote unit tests for one of my projects: On Windows, there are small numeric deviations when using the 32- / 64-bit version of R, which doesn't seem to be a problem on Linux or Mac. R64 on Windows produces the same results as R64/R32 on Linux or Mac: >

I've just tried to merge 2 data sets thinking they would only keep the common columns, but noticed the column count was not adding up. I've then replicated a simple example and got the same thing happening. q1. why doesn't 'b' have a column name? q2. when I merge, why does the new column 'y' have all values as 5.1? Thanks in advance, Mr. confused > a <-

I'm looking for something in R to fit a multivariate linear model robustly, using an M-estimator or any of the myriad of other robust methods for linear models implemented in robustbase or methods based on MCD or MVE covariance estimation (package rrcov). E.g., one can fit an mlm for the iris data as: iris.mod <- lm(cbind(Sepal.Length, Sepal.Width, Petal.Length, Petal.Width) ~ Species,