similar to: More flexible return values?

Hi, I'm a PhD student and I want to use the function 'daisy' from the package 'cluster' to compute dissimilarities. My variables are of mixed types so I use the argument 'stand' in daisy to define the type of my variables. I have the following error message : Warning message: binary variable(s) 13, 16, 17, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35,

Hi Everyone, We caught a report for a failed self test when using Clang 5.0 and 6.0 with -DDEBUG and -O1 (i.e., a "debug build"). The code is question is located at https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/blob/master/cham-simd.cpp . It is the SSSE3 code path for CHAM64. Other optimizations levels are OK for Clang. GCC, ICC and MSVC are OK. The code is valgrind, Sanitizer, Coverity and

Begin forwarded message: > From: <noreply at rubyforge.org> > Date: 15 June 2007 10:44:07 BDT > To: noreply at rubyforge.org > Subject: [ mocha-Patches-11583 ] Mocha 0.5.0 throwing unexpected > warnings, one line patch included > > Patches item #11583, was opened at 2007-06-14 21:28 > You can respond by visiting: > http://rubyforge.org/tracker/? >

Folks- With Rails 2.0.2, I''m seeing mocha failures where they did not fail with Rails 2.0.1 test_set_to_process_fail_in_transaction(FileRecordTest): NoMethodError: undefined method `ord'' for 63:Fixnum /home/wolpert/svn/rubylms/vendor/plugins/mocha/lib/mocha/class_method.rb:45:in `hidden_method''

I like the concise version of stubs available on true mocks: => #<Mock:0x32f76d4> >> foo.stubs(:one => ''hi'', :two => ''again'') => {:one=>"hi", :two=>"again"} Why can''t we do it on ''real'' objects? >> foo = Object.new >> foo.stubs(:method1 => ''a'',

FYI - I''ve just released Mocha 0.5.6 to make Ruby 1.9 compatibility fixes available for those using released packages rather than subversion trunk. I''m not feeling well and so haven''t been able to test it other than by running all the tests using Ruby 1.9. Please let me know if you have any problems using it. Remember that it sometimes takes a while for a new gem

I happened to mix ryan bates'' authentication scaffold with rspec_scaffold on a demo project. and ran into the problem of mixing mock frameworks...ryan uses mocha. So, as a learning experience, I choose to redo ryan''s tests without mocha but ran into a strange problem with tests of the User model. With debugging you can see.... If you run just the user_spec.rb file, everything

Hi, (Mocha and Stubba are great, btw.) Is there any way to alias the call to .type in Mocha? The issue is that AR effectively aliases the normal type method for the Column class (for whatever Adapter.) My code is reflecting on the adapter methods to iterate over the columns in a particular model. This makes it hard to write test code that stubs out columns and mocks my models. E.g. cols =

Index: Rakefile =================================================================== --- Rakefile (revision 73) +++ Rakefile (working copy) @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ task.rdoc_dir = ''doc'' task.template = "html_with_google_analytics" task.options << "--line-numbers" << "--inline-source" -

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: James Mead <jamesmead44 at gmail.com> Date: 15-Dec-2006 17:37 Subject: Re: Re: [HOWTO] Edgemocha To: John Pywtorak <jpywtora at calpoly.edu> On 15/12/06, John Pywtorak <jpywtora at calpoly.edu> wrote: > Compare > ~$ sudo gem install mocha > Attempting local installation of ''mocha'' > Successfully

Hi, I am running Samba 2.2.1 on a Redhat 7.2 machine and have the following in smb.conf: workgroup = AGS_NT security = domain password server = mocha bigblue encrypt passwords = yes everything else is default. "mocha" is the PDC and is a NT4 box". The machine has joined the domain with "smbpasswd -j AGS_NT". When using "smbpasswd

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:31 Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-8687 ] Block''s return value is dropped on stubbed yielding methods. To: noreply at rubyforge.org Bugs item #8687, was opened at 2007-02-15 17:29 You can respond by visiting:

I really like the idea of Mock Proxies as explained in Brian Takita''s post here: http://pivots.pivotallabs.com/users/brian/blog/articles/352-introducing-rr I posted to this list eariler with an incomplete implementation of .stops_mocking in the thread "Mocking Time, delegating to original object." The Mock Proxy pattern would make this simpler.

Hi, I''m getting a conflict between the Mocha plugin and the Rails SimplyHelpful plugin. For some reason the dom_id method from SimplyHelpful is not being found in my views when the Mocha plugin is installed. The dom_id method if used in the controller works properly. This is the error I get when running the tests: 1) Error: test_truth(HmmControllerTest):

"bitsweat" has kicked AR/Oracle while it was down... http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/7769 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r7769 | bitsweat | 2007-10-06 22:29:37 -0700 (Sat, 06 Oct 2007) | 1 line MySQL: speedup date/time parsing. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ U

Hi, I''ve been a happy user of Mocha for a while now. My current project is by far the most complicated I''ve ever worked on and Mocha has made testing it much easier than it would otherwise be. So, I was highly disturbed to come in this morning, run svn up and find that something in today''s update broke lots of my tests. I use Mocha as a Rails plugin under

"bitsweat" has given AR/SQLServer some love, but it''s still unhappy... http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/6912 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r6912 | bitsweat | 2007-05-31 10:15:56 -0700 (Thu, 31 May 2007) | 1 line Fix an edge case with find with a list of ids, limit, and offset. Closes #8437.

Hi all - I''ve recently made the leap from FlexMock to Mocha for mocks within my app. Today I decided to upgrade from Mocha 0.3.2 to Mocha 0.4.0. So I updated the gem, started rake and went to get some coffee. I came back 5 mins later and my units (which were clean) are now reporting 97 failures (!!!). Every failure reports a callstack like this: 18) Error:

I prefer to use rspec than test::unit for developing my apps. However I''ve found its mocking library to be pretty inflexible compared to Mocha. This isn''t really a surprise since rspec isn''t intended as a mocking framework, whereas Mocha is. So I''d like to play to both of their strengths and use rspec as my testing/specification framework and Mocha do to

I prefer to use rspec than test::unit for developing my apps. However I''ve found its mocking library to be pretty inflexible compared to Mocha. This isn''t really a surprise since rspec isn''t intended as a mocking framework, whereas Mocha is. So I''d like to play to both of their strengths and use rspec as my testing/specification framework and Mocha do to