similar to: create net if, but not connect

2015-11-14 16:43 GMT-03:00 Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com>: > On 11/14/2015 09:20 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > >> I'd want to connect a VM to another VM (or eventually to the host) via the >> "Linux bridge" so that I can demonstrate that capability in a classroom >> with only one laptop. >> > > You don't actually need to

On 7/6/20 5:10 AM, Yalan Zhang wrote: > > Hi Laine, > > For the feature testing before, I only test the linux bridge setting as > in 2), it works. > Now I tried 1), to use macvtap bridge mode connected to the PF, it can > not work as the hostdev interface can not get dhcp ip address on the guest. > Check on host, the /var/log/messages and dmesg both says: > >

2015-11-13 16:43 GMT-03:00 Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com>: > On 11/13/2015 09:15 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > >> But.... AFAIK, routers divide broadcast domains, and switches (and >> therefore bridges) divide collision domains. >> > > Oh good, Cisco terminology. :) > Oh yeah, > > I'll be more specific than I was earlier, then.

On 7/8/20 1:30 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote: > On 2020-07-06 10:01, Laine Stump wrote: >> On 7/6/20 5:10 AM, Yalan Zhang wrote: >>> Hi Laine, >>> >>> For the feature testing before, I only test the linux bridge setting as >>> in 2), it works. >>> Now I tried 1), to use macvtap bridge mode connected to the PF, it can >>> not work as the

On 3/21/20 1:08 AM, Yalan Zhang wrote: > In my understanding, the standby and primary hostdev interface may be in > different subnet. There is only one hostdev device in the team pair (that will be the one with <teaming type='transient'.../> since it needs to be unplugged during migration). The other device must be a virtio device (the one with <teaming

Hi Group, I have a problem with my FXO interface. It seems that asterisk cannot see any configured channels, only pseudo. Pls see the error and my config below. Rgrds Markus ----- May 2 15:09:00 NOTICE[17327]: app_dial.c:1010 dial_exec_full: Unable to create channel of type 'Zap' (cause 0 - Unknown) == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1) == Auto fallthrough, channel

hello, virsh iface-bridge to build bridge interface does not work for me,i've searched in google but got nothing ,please give some help,thanks. # VIRSH_DEBUG=0 VIRSH_LOG_FILE=bridge.log virsh iface-bridge eth0 br0 iface-bridge: found option <interface>: eth0 iface-bridge: <interface> trying as interface NAME libvir: Interface error : Interface not found: couldn't find

On 11/14/2015 09:20 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > I'd want to connect a VM to another VM (or eventually to the host) via the > "Linux bridge" so that I can demonstrate that capability in a classroom > with only one laptop. You don't actually need to attach *any* ethernet interfaces to do that. If you create a bridge with no Ethernet slaves, and then create two VMs,

Add a new constant ETH_P_802_3_MIN, the minimum ethernet type for an 802.3 frame. Frames with a lower value in the ethernet type field are Ethernet II. Also update all the users of this value that David Miller and I could find to use the new constant. Also correct a bug in util.c. The comparison with ETH_P_802_3_MIN should be >= not >. As suggested by Jesse Gross. Compile tested only.

Hello Folks, I am looking for ideas on how to create 1000 DOT1X sessions generated from a Linux BOX. DOT1X is a name for EAP packets that travel in an Ethernet environment and is used to transport authentication information before a PC will get access to the network, it is based on RFC-3748. Having this in mind a virtual interface will need a MAC address and an eventually IP (I want to stress out

This patch adds basic Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) capabilities to the Linux kernel Ethernet bridging code. A Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) is a capability within a physical end station that collaborates with an adjacent, external bridge to provide distributed bridging support between multiple virtual end stations and external networks. The VEPA collaborates by forwarding all

This patch adds basic Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) capabilities to the Linux kernel Ethernet bridging code. A Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) is a capability within a physical end station that collaborates with an adjacent, external bridge to provide distributed bridging support between multiple virtual end stations and external networks. The VEPA collaborates by forwarding all

This patch adds basic Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) capabilities to the Linux kernel Ethernet bridging code. A Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) is a capability within a physical end station that collaborates with an adjacent, external bridge to provide distributed bridging support between multiple virtual end stations and external networks. The VEPA collaborates by forwarding all

Dear All, I have the following configuration and I have ping from bridge : ///////////////////////////////////////////////////// iface eth0 inet static address 192.168.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 192.168.1.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255 gateway 192.168.1.1 auto ivbr0 iface ivbr0 inet static address 192.168.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.0

Hi, I have an existing fedora14 system with two interfaces and several virtual interfaces (as in eth0:0, etc). They are currently configured to not be controlled by NetworkManager, but just standard network services. I've recently started working with libvirtd, so I also have a virbr0 interface as well that has its own network and is masquerading the networking for the single KVM instance I

On 7/20/20 12:38 PM, daggs wrote: > Greetings, > > I've setup an vm with openwrt in it, defined a isolated lan between the vm and the host and booted the vm up. > I see the vm is up, made sure the vnic is visible in both the host and guest and added it to the br in the guest. > I've issued an dhcpd call on the vnic (labeled vnic0) in the host and got an ip, see: >

On 7/8/20 10:02 AM, Ken Cox wrote: > > On 7/8/20 1:30 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote: >> On 2020-07-06 10:01, Laine Stump wrote: >>> On 7/6/20 5:10 AM, Yalan Zhang wrote: >>>> Hi Laine, >>>> >>>> For the feature testing before, I only test the linux bridge setting as >>>> in 2), it works. >>>> Now I tried 1), to use

Hi, Could anyone help I'm getting the following error when I tried to add a new network interface. DETAILS Connection --------------------------- import libvirt conn = libvirt.open('qemu:///system') Interface XML ---------------------- <interface type="bridge" name="br0"> <start mode="onboot"/> <mtu size="1500"/>

On 12/10/18 1:24 PM, daggs wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm trying to add a virtual nic to an existing and active vm and I'm getting this error: > error: internal error: No more available PCI slots > > the cmd I'm trying to run is: virsh -c qemu:///system attach-interface --domain router --type bridge --source virbr0 --model virtio --config --live > > the lspci

This patch adds a 'hairpin' (also called 'reflective relay') mode port configuration to the Linux Ethernet bridge kernel module. A bridge supporting hairpin forwarding mode can send frames back out through the port the frame was received on. Hairpin mode is required to support basic VEPA (Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator) capabilities. You can find additional information on VEPA