similar to: reception of (Vegan) envfit analysis by manuscript reviewers

Dear r-Community, Step1: I would like to calculate a NMDS (package vegan, function metaMDS) with species data. Step2: Then I want to plot environmental variables over it, using function envfit. The Problem: One of these environmental variables is cos(EXPOSURE). But for flat releves there is no exposure. The value is missing and I can't call it 0 as 0 stands for east and west. Therefore I

Dear r-helpers, I just read in an article by Virtanen et al. (2006) where vegetation-environment relationships are studied by fitting smoothed surfaces on an NMDS ordination using GAMs (Wood 2000). The authors describe, that they used R? as goodness-of-fit statistic, which they compare to the R? of fitted vectors. Calculations were carried out using the package vegan (Oksanen). I know that I can

I'm having trouble with the ordisurf function in the vegan package. I have created an ordination plot (cmdscale) of 60 samples based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities, and would like to overlay various soil edaphic characteristics as possible clues to the clustering I observe in my plot. However, I find that ordisurf creates a surface on the plot that is a perfect, even gradient - and

I'm pretty new to R and would appreciate some help interpreting the output of a function that was recommended to me. I've used the *envfit *function in the vegan package to plot vectors of four climate variables onto a species matrix ordination. The output indicates that only a single variable (mean_temp) is significant: ***VECTORS NMDS1 NMDS2 r2

Hi R-experts, I am using the envfit function over an ordination of floristic data. The problem is that every time that I run it changes the results. Sometimes dramatically, selecting variables that the first time were not significant. I do not get what could be the problem or if is normal given the permutations are different. # the NMDS ordination gap_flor_NMDS_chord <- metaMDS(gaps_flor,

Hello R experts, I've used metaMDS to run NMDS on some fish abundance data, and am also working on correlating environmental data to the NMDS coordinates. I'm fairly new to metaMDS and NMDS in general, so I have what are probably some very basic questions. My fish abundance data consists of 66 sites for which up to 20 species of fish were identified and counted. I ran metaMDS on this data

Hello, I am using vegan to do an NMDS plot and I would like to suppress the labels for the loading vectors. Is this possible? Alternatively, how can I avoid overlap? Many thanks for the help. Example code: #perform NMDS using metaMDS() function spe.nmds<-metaMDS(data, distance='bray',k=2 , engine = "isoMDS", autotransform=F, trymax=1000) #calculate the loading (i.e.,

Hello there, I'm trying to plot vectors with p<0.1 in a NMDS ordination plot using p.max. Below the scripts I'm using. I guess I'm missing something! could you please give me a hand? species<-metaMDS(species_matrix)ef<-envfit(species,environmentaldata_file,permu=999,na.rm=TRUE)efplot(species, dis="sites")plot(ef,p.max=0.1) Error in plot.envfit(ef, p.max = 0.1) :

What does Generalized Cross Validation score mean. I preform and ordisurf on an ordination (nmds) with an environmental variable. I am trying to figure out "how well" the environmental varibles predict/explain the sites placements in species space. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Any pointers to literature... would be welcome. thanks in advance, -- Stephen Sefick Research

Hi Im currently trying to plot my NMDS data together with fitted variables (envfit funct) on an ordination plot. The plot function shows two displays="sites" and "sp". I was wondering how to plot it so that the sites come up as different points for different sites but the species come up as actual names? It looks a little busy at the moment with everything in. Sya -- View

I have a general question about using thin plate splines in the surf and ordisurf routines. My rudimentary knowledge of a gam is that with each predictive variable there is a different smooth for each one and then they are added together with no real interaction term (because they don't handle this well?). Now, If I have two variables that have a high D^2 score and a low GCV score (I am

Hi, I've been using R for a while now but I've got a problem with metaMDS (in the vegan package) that I can't quite figure out. I have a set of proportion data (from 0-1, rows sum to 1) that I apply metaMDS to using the command: nMDS.set=metaMDS(sqrt(test.set),distance="euclidean",k=3,zerodist="add",autotransform=FALSE) I am using a squared-chord distance

Hi all, I have site data with plant species cover and am looking for trends. I'm kind of new to this, but have done lots of reading and can't find an answer. I tried decorana (I know it's been replaced by ca.) and see a trend, but I'm not sure what it means. Is there a way to get the loadings/eigenvectors of the axes (like in PCA)? Is there a way to do this with rda() too? How

Hi, I'm trying to use metaMDS with a dissimilarity matrix of angles, not Bray-Curtis, and I wanted to know if there is an in-built function to produce a plot of stress values against dimensions, that could be used to determine the 'true' dimension of the solution. The number of objects is only a lowly 8 so any solution higher than 2-dimensional is not likely to be interpretable,

I am using the function metaMDS with jaccard distances to ordinate a set of constituent by site matrix. I can post this data if it would be helpful, but it is large to include in an email. I can also provide reproducable code if necessary. I would like to get an R^2 value for the axes of the ordination configuration that I get with metaMDS in the vegan package is there a way to do this- is it

Hi R experts, I'm looking for some help with plotting vectors from envfit in vegan, onto a 3d plot using ordiplot3d. So far I have data.mds <- metaMDS(data, k=3,trace = FALSE) vect_data<-envfit(data.mds,vegdata[,3:21],choices=1:3,permu=9999) ordiplot3d(data.mds,envfit=vect_data) ordixyplot(data.mds,pch=pts,envfit=vect_data) (my data's not really called data, I thought it might be

Dear r-helpers! Jan Thiele asked r-help-list in february, but I could not find an answer to his question. I have the same problem: While preparing figures of 'envfit' plots with vegan for publication, I ran into a layout problem, that I found no solution for in the literature or the help archive: The labels of the vectors that indicate correlations of environental variables sometimes

Dear all, I did a RDA and when I looked to the signification of the test with permutest, the output was non-significant. But when I used the envfit function, some of the vectors are significant. All the test's conditions are respected. What it means? Is it an error in the script? Commands and output: > permutest(rda.ind, perm=999, first=TRUE) Permutation test for rda  Call:

Dear R folks While preparing figures of 'envfit' plots with vegan for publication, I ran into a layout problem, that I found no solution for in the literature or the help archive: The labels of the vectors that indicate correlations of environental variables sometimes overlap with each other or with other content of the figure. Hence, I would like to rearrange them. Is there a

Hi everyone, I'd like to project two pcas onto one device window. I plot my first PCA: biplot(prcomp(t(cerebdevmat)), var.axes=FALSE, cex=c(1,.1), pc.biplot=TRUE) Now I'd like to project the features of another PCA onto this graph. Any suggestions? I know this is easily done in MatLab but haven't figured it out in R. Thanks, Tanya [[alternative HTML version deleted]]