similar to: Required audit group is missing...

I administer a remote server and want to apply some of the security patches. (I assume this is the best way to go since I can't go into single-user mode to use CVsup). I have a couple of questions. First, I have installed one of the pgp ports to verify the patches. When I run it, I get this message: > File 'buffer46.patch.asc' has signature, but with no text. > Text is

Question... I do alot of stable upgrades and as a result I spend alot of time with mergemaster. My changes in etc are minimal, so I rather wipe out my existing /etc (except for machine specific files like fstab, and so on) and have mergemaster install everything from /usr/src/etc. This way I don't have to spend time going through all the diffs. I have found that there is no quick and

Andre, Are you going to have time to MFC things from -current for auto-tuning -stable before 9.2? I fear (maybe unnecessarily?) that we are about to ship yet another release that can't do basic 10gigE when sufficient memory exists. If you don't have time, then let me know and I'll see what I can do. -- Alfred Perlstein VP Software Engineering, iXsystems

On 9/12/16 11:40 PM, Davide Italiano wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Alfred Perlstein via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Hey folks, >> >> I'm new here, wasn't expecting to subscribe but here I am. The reason I'm >> here is that I came across a doc bug, I spent quite a bit of time learning >> all the tips and

I have a client that has several dell machines, when he boots without a keyboard he gets: atkbdc0: <Keyboard controller (i8042)> at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 but no: atkbd0: <AT Keyboard> flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 This used to work, then was broken by someone trying to "do the right thing". We need the keyboards to be hot swappable. I recommend that

I sent an email out to freebsd-net without a response, soo this is my last attempt at getting any assistance here. I have a QLE3142-CU-CK (rebranded NetXen NX3-20GCU w/ NX3031 chipset) with no driver support in *BSD from anything I saw. I came across solaris's ntxn driver which seems to work appropriately but I have no use for solaris as a host o/s. Naturally I'll attempt at trying to get

Hello, I installed 4.8-RELEASE a few weeks ago, and since I let the effort sit stagnant for a while I decided to do the cvsup/buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld/mergemaster/MAKEDEV steps to get current. Went fine, rebooted, then noticed that just one CPU was recognized: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #0: Thu Jun 19 17:05:20 PDT 2003

hi guys, i have version 4.8-STABLE running. i've just update my stable-supfile and building, recompiling my custom kernel, my question is: if im going to cvsup my stable-supfile again, and compile the customed kernel again, do i have to: make buildworld, make installworld, mergemaster again or just make buildkernel KERNCONF & make install KERNCONF? hoping for your reply guys, thanks.

I'm still kind of hung up looking for some definitive answers on this issue. Perhaps you guys can help me out? Frank Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:55:33 -0500 (CDT) From: "F. Even" <freebsdlists@elitists.org> Subject: re: upgrading 4.0 to stable To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030929225533.81D352FE@elitists.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

On 9/13/16 1:04 AM, David Chisnall via llvm-dev wrote: > On 13 Sep 2016, at 08:45, Alex Bradbury via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> 2) Arguably, Phabricator provides a confusing interface for first-time >> or irregular users. > I don’t think it’s fair to say that the Phabricator interface is confusing for first-time or irregular users. I use Phabricator on

Hey folks, I'm new here, wasn't expecting to subscribe but here I am. The reason I'm here is that I came across a doc bug, I spent quite a bit of time learning all the tips and tricks for submitting patches to llvm including using phabricator and finally tweeting at the llvm account to get some attention. The patch is here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23393 I looked in git and it

I'm posting this here because I'd like to give people in the FreeBSD community first dibs on a job I need done. Friends/associates of people subscribed here are welcome as well. I need two web sites developed. They will both be relatively simple. On the order of 4-10 pages. Applicants should have: Good grasp of English grammar and have an understanding of principles used to market

Hi, I was under the impression a successful make world was updating include files in /usr/include/netinet too. When I have a good make world, the files in /usr/include have new time stamps, but the ones in netinet have not! Am I missing something here? My current stable doesn't compille properly it fails in kdump on a missing ioctlcmd_t typedef. Peter

Hello, I have a problem with loader. I recently upgraded from 6_rel to 7_rel. Now when I install world there is a problem booting. Here is what I do: cd /usr/src make buildworld make buildkernel KERNCONF=BLACK make installkernel KERNCONF=BLACK At this point I can reboot and all is good. After boot I install the new world: cd /usr/src mergemaster -p reboot into single user mode cd /usr/src make

On 12/4/13, 9:05 AM, Mark Felder said: ----------------- > There was no alternative; we couldn't keep BIND in base. BIND 9 will > certainly have a EoL before the EoL of FreeBSD 10.x, and we can't use > BIND 10 because it requires importing Python to base. I'm coming more and more to the conclusion that we should have a minimal Python in "base". More and more people

I'm currently administering a machine about 1500mi from me with nobody local to the machine to assist me. Anyways, my only access to this machine is via SSH, no remote serial console or anything. When I try to do a "make installworld" I end up with install: rename: /lib/INS@aTxk to /lib/libcrypt.so.3: Operation not permitted very shortly thereafter. I cannot boot

Hello again :) With POLLING enabled I experience about 10%-25% performance drop when copying files over network. Tested with both SAMBA and NFS. Is it normal? FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Sep 6 01:52:12 CEST 2008 fxp0: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0xc800-0xc83f mem 0xe1021000-0xe1021fff irq 20 at device 8.0 on pci1 # ifconfig fxp0 fxp0:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There has been a lot of discussion on these two mailing lists about the upcoming EoL of FreeBSD 4.x which I mentioned in my email entitled "HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon". Now that everybody (hopefully) has had their say, I'd like to offer some background and explanation. The concept of "security branches"

Hi, With the latest FreeBSD 7.1 PRE-RELEASE, I am having trouble ssh'ing to FreeBSD 4 systems. I am getting this error: OpenSSH_5.1p1 FreeBSD-20080901, OpenSSL 0.9.8e 23 Feb 2007 debug1: Applying options for * debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug1: Connection established. debug1: identity file /homes/rodrigc/.ssh/identity type -1 debug1: identity file

Greetings, Apologies if this is not the appropriate list, but my questions are about best practices in maintaining production servers (so I believe I can justify a post in -stable, short of a -release list :) I maintain a modest installation of 6 FreeBSD servers. They're CVSUP'd to RELENG_4_8 (I make buildworld on each individually) and I portupgrade ports as necessary. In an attempt to