similar to: Slightly off topic: nifty side affects...

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Slightly off topic: nifty side affects..."

1998 Dec 05
8
portmap vulnerability?
Are there any known vulnerabilities in portmap (redhat''s portmap-4.0-7b)? I''ve been receiving a lot of attempts to access the portmap port on some linuxppc machines I administer by various machines which clearly have no business with mine, and I wonder if this is an attempt to break in to my machines. I''ve searched some archives, but I haven''t yet found any
2010 Feb 03
2
cannot mount NFS share, portmap problems, what todo?
Hi all, I want to map an NFS share from a remote server to a local CentOS 5.4 server, but have a problem with portmap: root at mercury:[~]$ service portmap restart pmap_getmaps rpc problem: RPC: Unable to receive; errno = Connection reset by peer Stopping portmap: [FAILED] Starting portmap: [ OK ] root at
1998 Dec 15
1
portmap & tcpwrappers
I don't know if this is RedHat 5.1 specific, but be aware that the version of portmap distributed is the enhanced (Wietse Venema) version. That's great, except for two things. The first is documented, but easy to overlook: "In order to avoid deadlocks, the portmap program does not attempt to look up the remote host name or user name...The upshot of all this is that only network
2007 Dec 04
1
odd behavior with provider yum...
Anybody else noticed this: debug: package provider yum: Executing ''/usr/bin/yum -d 0 -e 0 list available portmap'' err: //nfs_server/Package[portmap]: Failed to retrieve current state of resource: Could not get latest version: Execution of ''/usr/bin/ yum -d 0 -e 0 list availaSearching 100% | =========================| 16 kB 00:03 Error: No
2002 Mar 12
2
Address already in use on samba 2.2.3.a
Hi there, when I try to start the nmbd -D daemon on my OpenServer5.0.5 box, I'll get the errormessage in log.nmbd: [...] [2002/03/12 19:30:18, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:(783) Netbios nameserver version 2.2.3a started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1994-2002 [2002/03/12 19:30:18, 0] lib/util_sock.c:(789) bind failed on port 137 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0. Error = Address already in use
2008 Mar 27
2
portmap not answering
CentOS 5 updated, Xen host. The portmap on this machine is somehow "stuck" and I can't figure out why. I enabled it to be able to mount a remote nfs share. The first hurdle was that "portmap" didn't appear in the chkconfig list, it was installed with the initial packages but not added to chkconfig. Took me a while to figure this out. Adding and starting it up is no
2000 Jan 23
2
portmap messages under /var/log/messages
I am running Redhat 6.1 as a firewall between a cable modem and my home network. Occasionally, I see messages such as these under /var/log/messages: Jan 17 13:38:16 saturn5 portmap[3726]: connect from 24.28.77.200 to dump(): request from unauthorized host Jan 18 14:00:34 saturn5 portmap[1544]: connect from 204.151.148.146 to dump(): request from unauthorized host My assumption is that the
2006 Aug 25
1
SELinux targeted - named, portmap and syslogd errors
Yesterday I activated SELinux in targeted mode, then I rebooted and started receiving some error messages in the system services initialization: ====================================================================== audit(1156518721.252:2): avc: denied { read } for pid=2223 comm="syslogd" name="libc-2.3.4.so" dev=dm-0 ino=50441 scontext=user_u:system_r:syslogd_t
2008 Apr 29
2
Do I need portmap, haldeamon & xfs running on dom0?
Hi all I have a CentOS 5.1 server running Xen and recently installed ConfigServer Firewall (CSF) on the main node to give it some protection. On a daily basis I''m getting an email about portmap. haldeamon and xfs consumming too much resources. The main node, dom0 doesn''t even do anything, and everything is done on the domU''s Here''s a thread I''ve
2007 Aug 15
1
nfs installation
Im trying to install nfs on my server. i tried to do apt-get install nfs nfs-lock portmap. but portmap is the only one available. Is there a new name for nfs and nfs-lock nowadays? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070815/ad008576/attachment.html>
2003 Jul 30
1
portmap, bind(), and NIS
Greetings I'm running an NIS server that I would very much *not* want to be accessible on some of its interfaces. portmap can be instructed to bind to specific addresses using the -h flag, but this seems to break ypbind. ypbind will attempt to find a server by issuing a broadcast rpc request to the local network. When portmap is not bound to INADDR_ANY, it will not reply to these requests.
2010 Oct 05
1
ole32 and CoGetCurrentLogicalThreadId
Hi, I'm trying to run an internal application from where I work on wine. The application uses a lot of COM components and multiple threads. But when running it, it seems to hang pretty quickly. I added the output from wine below, from what I understand, it's stopping and waiting on a lock, using CoGetCurrentLogicalThreadId that is not implemented. I'm just starting to use wine, so I
2006 Jun 13
2
Cleaning Up My Process Table
I'm upgrading my primary server from RH 7.2 to CentOS-4.3.ServerCD. I REALLY like the ServerCD. Who needs all the fluff that comes with a standard distro? If I want a system-config-gooey I can run Xnest [1] and ssh -X from my laptop. Anyway I have two questions: 1) How can I collectively stop all the NFS, portmap, whatever? I'm hoping it can be manipulated as a group because occationally
2002 May 14
3
network boot nfs as root
Hello everyone, I am using pxelinux to boot kernel from network, which goes ok. But when root must be mounted from NFS, I get the following code: Looking up port 100003/2 on 192.168.1.1 RPC: sendmsg returned error 22 portmap: RPC call returned error 22 ROOT-NFS: unable to get nfsd port number from server, using default looking up port of RPC 100005/1 on 192.168.1.1 RPC: sendmsg returned error
2007 Nov 22
2
dovecot loading during boot
I have two RHEL4 email servers running postfix/MailScanner which use dovecot. They work great. But during bootup the nfslock script in my init.d loads rpc.statd and calls portmap to get a port number. Portmap keeps giving rpc.statd the imaps port number (993). I then have to stop my mail server services, manually start dovecot, then restart the mail server services and everything goes merrily on
2009 Nov 26
5
rquota didnot show userquota (Solaris 10)
Hi, we have a new fileserver running on X4275 hardware with Solaris 10U8. On this fileserver we created one test dir with quota and mounted these on another Solaris 10 system. Here the quota command didnot show the used quota. Does this feature only work with OpenSolaris or is it intended to work on Solaris 10? Here what we did on the server: # zfs create -o mountpoint=/export/home2
2012 Mar 04
1
Unable to start nfs server
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20120304/04099724/attachment.html>
2012 Oct 24
2
Why portmap is needed for NFSv4 in CentOS6
Hi all, I have setup a CentOS6.3 x86_64 host to act as a nfs server. According to RHEL6 docs, portmap is not needed when you use NFSv4, but in my host I need to start rpcbind service to make NFSv4 works. My /etc/sysconfig/nfs # # Define which protocol versions mountd # will advertise. The values are "no" or "yes" # with yes being the default MOUNTD_NFS_V2="no"
2011 May 31
1
Unable to mount Centos 5.6 Server via nfs4 - Operation Not Permitted - MADNESS!
After getting a reasonably configured NFS4 setup working on my Scientific Linux server, I spent a majority of my evening trying to do the same with my Centos 5 box, with fruitless results. Most attempts to mount that server returns the following message: [root at sl01 log]# mount -t nfs4 192.168.15.200:/opt/company_data /mnt mount.nfs4: Operation not permitted As nearest as I can tell, I was
2010 Jun 16
5
Disabling services in CentOS 5.5
Hello all, I have been doing some searching for information about disabling services within a CentOS 5.5 install. I have found a few different opinions, and wanted to ask for some feedback. First off, the system is running a LAMP stack to serve a web application. It will only be doing email to send occasional messages out (sent via the application only). It will not be receiving email for any