similar to: Stallion EC8/32-AT

i got a idea instead of creating wine from scratch witch is a extremely slow process why not make wine as a utility that pulls all files and binary's needed from a windows in stallion disc and wine could be set up with the wine drive but with actual windows binary's. my idea would be that wine just acts as a wrapper that enables the windows code to work in Linux if you own your own

hey list! I am attempting to shore up some centos machines (ranging from centos 5 to centos 5.4) for pci compliance by changing the port that nlockdmgr listens on to function under a privileged port. So what I did was try to hardcode the port by editing /etc/sysconfig/nfs # TCP port rpc.lockd should listen on. LOCKD_TCPPORT=1011 # UDP port rpc.lockd should listen on. LOCKD_UDPPORT=1011 #

Please specify the Samba version you are running - winbindd in 2.2.2 had a *big* memory leak which would certainly eat all your memory over three days on a moderately busy server. The more work winbindd does the more memory it chews - which might explain the end of day incidents. Try using 'M' in Top to get an idea of who is eating the memory. Noel There is no indication in TOP as to

We've been holding back on this release to coincide with the Asterisk 1.4.0 release. This is mostly a compatibility release, but there are a few new features: * No longer requires register_globals in PHP * Separated code from configuration settings in ./lib/defines.php (hopefully this will make future upgrades easier) * Migrated all database interfaces to PEAR::DB which

On Monday 14 March 2005 06:29 pm, Mark Williamson wrote: > > I don''t know if this is the right place to post, but I can''t find any > > info about my problem on the net. > > Yes, this is the right place. > > > title Xen2610 > > kernel /boot/xen.gz dom0_mem=131072 console=vga > > module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.10-xen0 root=/dev/hde1 ro console=tty0

Guys, anybody has seen or is using some kind of softphone on any square screen device with WM5? Ive tried sjlabs one and xten for pocket pc and they do work on Wm5 but they are designed for standard screens, anybody using anything on square ones?

This was posted not too long ago on sci.crypt... Enjoy... I think the most relevant information is near the top, but it''s all quite good... :-) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- There is no intrinsic difference between algorithm and data, the same information can be viewed as data in one context and as algorithm in another. Why then do so many people claim that encryption algorithms

What is the best way to have 1 phone check multiple voicemail accounts. I am using polycom 650 phones, and am wondering if mwi can work when checking multiple accounts. -Chris Sent from my BlackBerry? wireless handheld

I've already sunk several hours into this without any real progress, so I'd really appreciate any help My task is simple -- establish a connection between a softphone on XP ProSP2 to a Asterisk server on Linux FC4 over a LAN through a Netgear router. The server will then go out to a PSTN termination service. Thus far, the PSTN termination connection works fine -- I've opened up 4569

Hi, Is there any hope getting openssh to support a sequence of several authentication methods (requiring different passwords) for one login? I.e. take the standard static password, feed it into pam_unix.so for verification, then ask the user for yet another password (e.g. a one-time password) and verify this one by a different PAM module Currently, verifying either a static password or a one time

I have a simple goal: to use PAM to do my TIS authsrv authentications. I have Mark Roth's pam_authsrv module -- it works fine. + I can configure openssh for PAM, and it works fine (negotiating ssh2 keyboard interactive auth method). + I can configure ssh.com-3.0.1 for PAM, and it also works fine (negotiating ssh2 pam-1 at ssh.com auth method). Unfortunately, the openssh client

Hi all, Link protection is a new feature we are planning to introduce to Solaris and we would like to solicit your feedback on it. Please see attached document for details.

> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Doug Lytle <support@drdos.info> > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion < > asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> > Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:25:11 -0400 > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] How big is *your* dialplan?? > Steve Murphy wrote: > > Hello! > > > > In my relentless

On 1/3/07, asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com < asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com> wrote: > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Dan Austin" <Dan_Austin@Phoenix.com> > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" < > asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> > Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:33:02 -0800 > Subject:

Hello! In my relentless quest for knowledge, I pose this question: who's got the biggest dialplans, and how big are these monsters? What's the biggest dialplan in use right now? If you feel you are a competitor, let me know how many contexts/extensions/priorities you are dealing with. Maybe the context with the most extensions, the extension with the most priorities would be

Be ERECT in less than 15 mins PRlCE: $ 2 / use visit our website --> goldslive.net

Hi, during some big discussions in the last monts on various lists, one of the problems was that some people would like to use freebsd-update but can't as they are using a custom kernel. With all the kernel modules we provide, the need for a custom kernel should be small, but on the other hand, we do not provide a small kernel-skeleton where you can load just the modules you need.

[mod: Forwarded by Jeff Uphoff. I tried to mangle the headers that it appears as the original post: with an invalid return address. -- REW] A few months back, a very alpha version of bliss got posted. That shouldn''t have happened, but, it was pretty much ignored so I didn''t worry about it. But now it seems there''s a bit of a fuss about this. I''ll post the

This time make world on Ubuntu 10.04 gives following error gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -m32 -march=i686 -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-unused-value -Wdeclaration-after-statement -D__XEN_TOOLS__ -MMD -MF .fsimage.so.d -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs -I../../../tools/libfsimage/common/

I haven't recompiled since 3.5p1. I compile --with-privsep-user=nobody * I observe that none of my processes is uid "nobody". In addition, previously I had to disable privsep on either AIX or OSF1 (I forget which), this time it just worked. I was thinking it was because Progress Had Been Made. Now, observing so many root processes, I think it's because privsep is not actually