similar to: [Fwd: Release Engineering Status Report]

Navigation Bar March-September 2003 Status Report Introduction: The FreeBSD Bi-monthly status reports are back! In this edition, we catch up on seven highly productive months and look forward to the end of 2003. As always, the FreeBSD development crew has been hard at work. Support for the AMD64 platform quickly sprang up and is nearly complete.

Hi all, I'm trying to find out if UDF support can be added to 4-STABLE. The web page http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/udf/ says that such a thing can be found at http://www.softweyr.com/asmodai/projects/udf, but the latter URL is broken. Any pointers will be greatly appreciated. Warren

Hi all, Can anybody point me at the UDF code for FreeBSD 4-STABLE? There's a link at http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/udf/ to some code, but the website (http://www.softweyr.com/asmodai/projects/udf) doesn't have the code any more. Many thanks in advance! Warren

Hello all, Help me please do mirror of freebsd.org. I got *.sgml through CVSup, installed textproc/docproj. But when I typed make: [root@xxx /www/freebsd/]make ===> en ===> en/security ===> en/commercial ===> en/docproj ===> en/news ===> en/news/1993 ===> en/news/1996 ===> en/news/1997 ===> en/news/1998 ===> en/news/1999 ===> en/news/2000 ===> en/news/2001

Hi, According to the webpage [1], 6.1 has been branched on April 5. However, I noticed that there is a tag called RELENG_6_1, not a branch called RELENG_6_1. For example, sys/conf/newvers.sh [2], rev 1.69.2.11, is on RELENG_6 branch with tag RELENG_6_1_BP and RELENG_6_1. It is a bit strange for me. At least, we have RELENG_X_Y branch before and RELENG_X_Y_BP tag. Is there any special reason that

FreeBSD Community, I'm pleased to announce a CFT for builds of FreeBSD 12-stable and 13-current using "TrueOS-inspired" packaged base. These are stock FreeBSD images which will allow users to perform all updating via the 'pkg' command directly. Rather than trying to answer all questions in this announcement, we've created a FAQ page with more details. Please refer to

Hi, I have strange problem when booting FreeBSD-6.x in HP Proliant ML370 G4. The problem is "-" appears on the screen and it never boots unless somebody hits the "Enter" key. Sometimes even PS2 keyboard doesn't respond during that time. Tried with USB keyboard, same problem. The machine has dual Xeon 3.2 GHz, 1GB of RAM and LSI Logic (mpt-5.0.5.20.00 bios) LSI1030-IT

Hello, I'm trying to upgrade from 5-stable to 6-stable; after rebooting to the new kernel, the amr(4) module (amr.ko) refuses to load with this message: link_elf: symbol cam_simq_alloc undefined However, a quick nm(1) on /boot/kernel/cam.ko does show: ... 0000f0ac T cam_sim_set_path 0000efc4 T cam_simq_alloc 0000efd4 T cam_simq_free ... and cam.ko is already loaded before amr.ko.

The FreeBSD Project is pleased to announce its participation in the Google "Summer of Code" program designed to introduce students to open source software development. The FreeBSD Project received over 350 applications, amongst which 18 projects have been selected for funding. Unfortunately, due to the limited number of spots available, we were unable to fund many first rate

Hi, We bought a new Dell PowerEdge 2950III with Perc 6/i and have the disk geometry problem using 6.3 final or 7.0 RC1. Seems that we are not alone at least one guy has similar problem reported earlier: http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2008-01/msg00506.html I was reading the mailing list and found that some of the people are happily using this hardware with the latest

Can anyone tell me if/when the Adaptec AIC9410 SAS/SATA controller will be supported? Michael Grant

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev > <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> I'm creating a bootstrap buildbot on AArch64 with LLD and I just >> realised the "accepted" way to make clang call lld

I didn't seen any roadmap and plan about OrcJit & MCJIT. And would OrcJIT be stablize in version 7.0? Or latter version? Would MCJIT be removed in source tree, when? -- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Valery, On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 13:15 +0200, Valery Khamenya wrote: > Hi, > > where could one find any LLVM development roadmap for this > and perhaps next year? About the best "roadmap" we have is the list of enhancements in Bugzilla:

[ the following report applies to the latest cvs version (tag of BRANCH_NTDOM). details of how to use public cvs to access the samba source repository are at http://samba.anu.edu.au/cvs.html. please note that this development is in parallel with, and therefore does not affect, the current development plan for samba: please see the Roadmap and WhatsNew files with the samba distribution.

I will be there again! On 30 July 2012 10:35, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote: > On 30 July 2012 09:34, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote: > > The tentative date for the next Cambridge LLVM Social is Wed 22nd > > October, 7:30pm at the Cambridge Blue. > > Of course, I meant August. Thanks Igor for the correction!! > > -- >

We had 12-14 people and some very interesting discussions. To capture some of that for posterity, I'm adding the minutes here: http://llvm.systemcall.org/index.php?title=Cambridge_LLVM_Social -- cheers, --renato http://systemcall.org/

On 21 Mar 2015, at 10:14, Florian Sager <sager at agitos.de> wrote: > > Hi Timo, > > congrats to the merger with OX. > > Currently the implementation of RFC 5257, ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1, has > only low priority on http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Roadmap > I want to explain a scenario that would benefit from annotation support > to - maybe - increase the priority in your

I have committed a fix for the panic that happened with the da(4) or cd(4) drivers configured and INVARIANTS turned on. Let me know if there are any problems/comments/questions. Ken ----- Forwarded message from "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@FreeBSD.org> ----- From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 17:40:40 -0700 (PDT) To:

Mike Silbersack wrote: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Scott Long wrote: > > >>Patches have been floated on the mailing list that revert PAE in its >>various stages. Maybe those need to be brought back up. Silby? Tor? >> >>Scott > > > I believe that Tor's commit on August 30th resolved the PAE-related > problems, so there is no need for a reversion.