Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "5.1 release cvsuping"
2003 May 22
2
issue with ports
my ports database seems to have become broken. I'm running -stable, but
haven't rebuilt the system in a year or so (I know, security vulerabilities,
but the box has been shelved in this time).
anyhow, at this point, I can't do even a make clean in ports, or build
portupgrade. I fetched portupgrade with pkg_add hoping that running pkgdb -F
would sort things out, but it errors with:
**
2004 Jul 17
3
upgrading form 4.2 to 5.x
Hello,
My company has been asked to help with the upgrade of several Freebsd
systems that are pretty old. The customer is running a file server samba
also running apache running FBSD 4.2, he wants to upgrade using cvsup &
the make buildworld procedure to upgrade to 5.x. Im very familier with the
make buildworld procedure however there have been significant changes
between 4.2 & 5.x so is
2003 Apr 03
4
Signal 11 on X server startup (Was: HEADSUP: XFree86 4.3.0 update
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 19:24, Ted Faber wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 02:48:26AM -0500, Andrew J Caines wrote:
> > Starting the server as normal with xinit gives normal startup messages, then fails
> > with a signal 11:
>
> I have this problem, too. Same nv server. I'm happy to provide
> details. One that might help is that this is an Athelon XP 1800.
>
>
2003 Jun 07
3
What happened with 5.1-RELEASE?
There used to be messages on this list around the time
of a new release, letting people know what was happening,
but that isn't happening this time. What list should the
following question be directed to, if not this one?
My auto-download program snagged a copy of the 5.1-RELEASE
install ISO yesterday morning, but no release announcement
was made. The directories exist on most, if not all
2003 Aug 19
3
Is rl broken?
Greetings,
I cvsup'd and rebuilt a FreeBSD 4.8 system last Friday after receiving the
realpath security advisory. The machine is remote and the NIC uses the rl
driver. After booting the machine I had no network connectivity. The
person at the remote site says the boot was normal and he could see that the
NIC was properly configured but he could not ping it and I could not login.
We booted
2003 Sep 19
1
making 4.8-RELEASE-p7
Hello, freebsd-security.
I'm trying to build 4.8-RELEASE-p7 to distribute it trought my
clients. What am I doing:
#cd /usr/share/examples/cvsup
#cvsup standard-supfile (after I've done necessary changes)
#cd /usr/src
#make buildworld
Thus, I have /usr/obj "populated with the output of ``make
buildworld''" as it described in man 7 release.
Then, I have read
2003 Sep 17
2
FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:12.openssh [REVISED]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
=============================================================================
FreeBSD-SA-03:12 Security Advisory
FreeBSD, Inc.
Topic: OpenSSH buffer management error
Category: core, ports
Module: openssh, ports_openssh,
2003 Sep 17
2
FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:12.openssh [REVISED]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
=============================================================================
FreeBSD-SA-03:12 Security Advisory
FreeBSD, Inc.
Topic: OpenSSH buffer management error
Category: core, ports
Module: openssh, ports_openssh,
2003 Sep 25
6
FreeBSD Patch question
I administer a remote server and want to apply some of the security patches. (I assume this is the best way to go since I can't go into single-user mode to use CVsup).
I have a couple of questions. First, I have installed one of the pgp ports to verify the patches. When I run it, I get this message:
> File 'buffer46.patch.asc' has signature, but with no text.
> Text is
2003 Aug 06
2
Checking realpath file up to date
On the advisory about the realpath problem it says that it was corrected:
RELENG_4_8
src/UPDATING 1.73.2.80.2.3
src/lib/libc/stdlib/realpath.c 1.9.14.1
src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.44.2.29.2.2
I ran cvsup and when I look at my src/lib/libc/stdlib/realpath.c I see
2003 Sep 25
1
FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:14.arp [REVISED]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
=============================================================================
FreeBSD-SA-03:14.arp Security Advisory
The FreeBSD Project
Topic: denial of service due to ARP resource starvation
Category: core
Module: sys
Announced:
2003 Aug 30
4
Heads up: panics should be fixed!
As others have noted, Tor's patch appears to be a total solution to the
recent instability the PAE patch introduced. So, if you're experiencing
panics with a recent kernel, or are in a position to stress a machine,
please cvsup and give it a test!
Thanks,
Mike "Silby" Silbersack
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 08:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tor Egge
2008 Aug 06
2
FreeBSD 6.3/amd64: cvsup: Bus error (core dumped)
Hello.
Dont know is this list right for this topic, but dont know witch one is.
So
I got 6.3-STABLE-200807-amd64-disc1.iso
I have installed it
cd /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui/
make install
make clean
#cvsup some-stable-sup-file
Connected to cvsup.xxxxxx.ru
Bus error (core dumped)
I cant get fresh src and ports trees and cant compile fresh 6.X-stable
system with athlon64 optimization. :(
2003 Jun 13
5
cvsup with tag=. on src and upgrading (in general)
I'm just getting into regular use with cvsup (way over do on that one),
and I tried to specify a tag=. in the cvsup file. Here's the file:
# This file specifies src files are to be uploaded.
*default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org
# *default tag=RELENG_5_1_0_RELEASE
*default tag=.
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix compress
*default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup
2003 Sep 11
2
DNS related ports from ports/net/ to ports/dns
At 12:44 AM 9/12/2003 -0400, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>New categories are added slowly to the cvsup category lists. It's best
>to cvsup using ports-all, and add the directories you don't want (such
>as languages: "ports/french*" etc.) to the refuse file.
How is having a refuse file slowing down CVSup down best? The fact is a
category does not appear often and for those
2003 Jul 12
1
Problems Compiling after upgrading via cvsup
I couldn't compile any thing after upgrading 4.6.2 to 4.8 via cvsup
I also updated ports via cvsup
And nothing would compile, nothing, just error after error
I cd /usr/ports did a -"make clean"- (which takes over an hour on my
machine)
Now all my compile problems have gone away
I think I will cd to /usr/ports after doing anything with cvsup or any
install, just in case
or am I
2003 Jun 24
5
IPv6 CVSUP mirrors?
Hi.
I am looking for an IPv6 capable CVSUP mirror. I found a discussion
from one year ago where it was stated that CVSUP was not IPv6-capable.
Does anyone know if this has changed?
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- sam@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam
2005 Apr 05
2
About the FreeBSD Security Advisories
Hello..
I've noticed a delay between when the security advisories are sent and
when the cvsup servers, ftp mirrors and web mirrors are updated. Is this
delay on purpose to give the users some time to update/patch their
system(s) before it hit pages like bugtraq, etc.. or is it just a caused
by the delay between when the ftp/cvsup servers are synced?
Best regard,
Jesper Wallin
2003 Jul 04
1
Updating from 4.8 release to 4.8 stable
Hello,
I am very new to FreeBSD and just installed 4.8 release. I want to upgrade this to stable. I have printed some of the pages out for makeworld and CVSUP, I am wondering what the best method for doing the updates are, downloading the individual packages and installing or using the CVSUP to do this? Currently I used mostly Red Hat Linux but have wanted to give this a try for some time
2004 Oct 26
5
please test: Secure ports tree updating
CVSup is slow, insecure, and a memory hog. However, until now
it's been the only option for keeping an up-to-date ports tree,
and (thanks to all of the recent work on vuxml and portaudit)
it has become quite obvious that keeping an up-to-date ports
tree is very important.
To provide a secure, lightweight, and fast alternative to CVSup,
I've written portsnap. As the name suggests, this