similar to: FreeBSD not-so-stable

FreeBSD psg.com 11.3-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p3 dovecot 2.3.6 (7eab80676) (latest from binary package system) symptom: multiple imap4s users complain that they can not fetch mail stopping and restarting dovecot is a temporary workaround dovenull 3713 0.0 0.0 11036 6816 - I 02:27 0:00.17 dovecot/imap-login user19 3714 0.0 0.0 9464 4756 - S 02:27

Hi, We have a serious issue running on our POP/IMAP servers these days. The load average of a servers spikes up to 400-500 as a uptime command result, for a particular time period , to be specific mostly in noon time and evening, but it last for few minutes only. We have 2 servers running dovecot 1.1.20 , in loadbanlancer, We have used KEEPLIVE (1.1.13) for loadbalacing. Server

Version: dovecot --version: 1.0.0 OS: OS X - 10.4.9 Architecture: G5 Dual/1.8Ghz Had a fairly normal time correction last night: May 9 20:56:56 G518X2 ntpd[219]: time set -1.212733 s Which dovecot duly noted: May 9 20:56:56 G518X2 dovecot: auth(default): Time just moved backwards by 1 seconds. I'll sleep now until we're back in present. This morning all of the dovecot processes are

Hello, I have a FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE amd64 box which gives this message with apache 2.2 very often. Previously the contents of the box was on 6.3-STABLE x86 and I had no such problems. This started right away when we moved to 7, 64bit. FreeBSD web.XXXXX.com 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Apr 22 02:13:30 UTC 2008 yurtesen@web.XXXXX.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WEB amd64 Approaching the

Hello, I have a small problem with dovecot 1.0RC2. This didn't happen with former versions. There are imap processes that are left open a long while after the client disconnected. I am running dovecot on OpenBSD 3.8. Below is the output of a process list. As you can see, there are many imap processes for the same login running. simon 11593 0.0 0.1 924 1140 ?? I 12:21PM

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.17.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.17.rc1.tar.gz.sig Quite a lot of changes, so here's a release candidate first. If no problems are reported I'll make v2.2.17 release early next week. Please test especially non-Linux systems as there are some larger configure/Makefile changes done since v2.2.16. * Dovecot no

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.17.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.17.rc1.tar.gz.sig Quite a lot of changes, so here's a release candidate first. If no problems are reported I'll make v2.2.17 release early next week. Please test especially non-Linux systems as there are some larger configure/Makefile changes done since v2.2.16. * Dovecot no

>> > I assume you're talking about the FreeBSD run. I'm not sure what is >> > going >> > on >> >> No. You can see problem with Feature tests at >> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/X86/ also (see Feature Test Results >> section ) > > I'm not sure that I follow. The qmtest stuff isn't working on Zion > because (I

I think there is a very similar situation with the PowerPC/Mac OS X nightly tests. Over each of the past few nights, something has been filling up the process table, causing me to be unable to log in. The nightly tester wrote out regression test and feature test logs featuring hundreds of "Resource temporarily unavailable" errors from fork(), so I assume it's the qmtest

I am running centos 4.2 on a P4 3 GIG with 2 GIG ram. This machine has been fine for months. my laptop is fine. X is taking 99 percent of the cpu after some time. All I was doing was editing code. If I killall -9 X it comes back for a while then maxes out again. Any ideas on something to tweek??? THanks, jerry ------------ Tasks: 120 total, 2 running, 118 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie

Hi, I follow different setup instructions and I can't make imap-hibernate work. I've tried vmail and dovecot as users, tried to set mode to 0666, without success. I'm using FreeBSD 11.2. Is imap-hibernate compatible with FreeBSD 11.2? My operational system: # uname -v FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p9 #0: Tue Feb 5 15:30:36 UTC 2019 root at

>> I'm not sure that I follow. The qmtest stuff isn't working on Zion >> because (I believe) of an upgrade that happened on the machine (the >> qmtest >> binary doesn't work anymore?). Are you seeing a problem on freebsd where >> the feature tests go into a loop? If so, can you provide us with more >> information? >> make, ~ > ps -xu

On 23.8.2019 17.19, Randy Bush via dovecot wrote: > FreeBSD psg.com 11.3-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p3 > dovecot 2.3.6 (7eab80676) (latest from binary package system) > > symptom: multiple imap4s users complain that they can not fetch mail > > stopping and restarting dovecot is a temporary workaround > > dovenull 3713 0.0 0.0 11036 6816 - I 02:27

A typo in test/Makefile was the trigger for this problem: http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20041101/ 020216.html John, can you please look into this bug some more and add some error checking to the llvm-specific qmtest python modules to make this error less severe? Thanks! -Brian On Nov 3, 2004, at 10:35 AM, Brian Gaeke wrote: > > I think there is a very

Hello, I see that incase of command execution: :fork()" is called twice, in sshd. Once to spin off child sshd from parenat and second from child sshd, to execute command. Due to this I see 3 processes being created for each connection viz: 16398 0.0 0.3 1284 892 ?? S 4:33PM 0:00.05 sshd:child 16399 0.0 0.1 320 232 p4 Is+ 4:33PM 0:00.06 -sh -c foo_command 16401 0.0

Brian Gaeke wrote: > > A typo in test/Makefile was the trigger for this problem: > > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20041101/ > 020216.html > > John, can you please look into this bug some more and add some error > checking to the llvm-specific qmtest python modules to make this error > less severe? Does the fork bomb occur in the

Hi! Our Samba file server seems to have a memory leakage. We are using samba as file server out of the box (debian sarge) on kernel 2.6.16.31. After a while users who have some shares and files open are acquiring more and more memory until the smbd dies. Here is a small shortcut from top: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 13843 gxxxxx 16 0 51792 44m 2552 S

Hi, I'm running Plesk 11.0.9 on a Centos 5.5. A website on that box got hacked last week and malicious code got inserted into some html/php files. So I went to find out what happened... I found no back doors by using rkhunter or manually searching for suspicious files in /tmp, etc. No activity at all in the php logs at the time of the attack. I also analysed of course the system logs

On 12/10/15 08:27, VigneshDhanraj G wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Thanks for the help. > > Yes, Joined to the domain, ftp uses pam authentication. After > upgrading samba i found ftp pam authentication not working > > /etc/pam.d/ftp contains > > #%PAM-1.0 > auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_smbpass.so > auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so

Recent proftpd security vulnerability release FYI. Ports has latest patched proftpd distribution. -- Jez http://www.munk.nu/ -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Dave Ahmad <da@securityfocus.com> Subject: ISS Security Brief: ProFTPD ASCII File Remote Compromise Vulnerability (fwd) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:25:54 -0600 (MDT) Size: 4588 Url: