similar to: Processed: found 661231 in 1:3.22+dfsg1-2, found 527067 in 1.4.15+nmu2, found 669398 in 0.65+nmu2 ...

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user debian-qa at lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was debian at abeckmann.de). > usertags 669005 piuparts Bug#669005: uninstallable on sid (might just need require a rebuild) There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: piuparts. > affects 669005 + shogun-python-static shogun-python-modular

Thanks Cristoph, I have that code in my backend, but unless I do the following, the registers are never considered 'live' into the call. / Handle a function call let isCall = 1, Defs = [ R0, R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R24, R25, R26, R27, R28, R29, R30, R31, R32, R33, R34, R35, R36, R37, R38, R39, R40, R41,

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # bugs with submitter debian at abeckmann.de > submitter 479445 ! Bug #479445 [gnuplot] gnuplot: wrong line numbers for missing files reported during replot Changed Bug submitter to 'Andreas Beckmann <anbe at debian.org>' from 'Andreas Beckmann <debian at abeckmann.de>' > submitter 681568 ! Bug #681568

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.1.2-1 Severity: important User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8): http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails Filing this as important as having a piuparts

FYI: The status of the xen source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 4.6.0-1 Current version: 4.6.0-1+nmu2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more

I am very new to FreeBSD and Unix in general. I may have more problems than I think, but here goes. I am trying to make depend && install WITH_BSD_JDK=TRUE clean with openoffice. Everything works fine until I get to the jvm section (seen below). I have tried looking for this on the net, but I have not been to successful in finding a solution. Thanks for your help. Stephen

Happened twice. There might also be a race condition and some bad pointers in chan_local.locals_show. First the segfault. CLI> show locals <unowned> -- 6001@default Segmentation fault (core dumped) [root@mars asterisk]# ll -tr total 22260 [...] Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_local.so #0 __pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=0x5d8) at mutex.c:99 99 mutex.c: No such file

Hi Micah, > In X86InstrInfo.td for Call Instructions, it mentions that Uses for > argument registers are added manually. Can someone point me to the > location where they are added as the comment doesn't reference a > where or how? the register uses are added by the function X86TargetLowering::LowerCall() during the DAG Lowering phase. This is the relevant code segment: // Add

Hi, I was hoping I could modify a locally mounted registry hive using regpatch and a .reg file but the -F argument seems to have no function. (Strace shows it ignores it and just operates on /var/lib/samba/private/hklm.ldb) Below is output with debug on. rfm6 at ubuntuSSDx64:cp /mnt/xp/WINDOWS/system32/config/software /tmp/software rfm6 at ubuntuSSDx64:/tmp/config$ sudo regpatch -d=10 -F

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user debian-qa at lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was anbe at debian.org). > tags 714794 - moreinfo Bug #714794 {Done: Gilles Filippini <pini at debian.org>} [release.debian.org] pu: package sikuli/1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-5+deb7u1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > tags 710035 - moreinfo Bug #710035

Package: xcp-guest-templates Version: 0.1-4 Severity: important User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8): http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails Filing this as important as having a piuparts

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-1 Severity: important User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8): http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails Filing this as important as having a piuparts clean

Hello, I am implementing procmail with postfix on a new SMTP server, I have too many .procmailrc from my former sendmail installation and not enough time to learn maildrop and migrate right now. It seems that LOGABSTRACT does not work : I don't get the datas LOGABSTRACT should prompt in the log, whether I don't set LOGABSTRACT (default behaviour) or if I set it to "on",

I have been unable to find anything that will tell me what the minimum system requirements are to build Samba 3.22. What version of gcc, glibc, etc. Can anyone tell me what they are?

Hi, I've been going through my queue of candidate patches for the 3.6 branch, and I think the process could be smoother if we had more code owners. So, I'd like to encourage people to nominate themselves or others as code owners for any part of LLVM that doesn't already have one. The responsibilities of a code owner include reviewing patches submitted to llvm-commits and approving

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 03:47:49PM -0800, David Blaikie wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> > wrote: > > > Hi David, > > > > The way I imagined that we might want to extend the MCStreamer API (this > > was motivated by DIEData) is by allowing clients to move bytes and fixups > > into the MC layer. >

Hi I just want to say that I have done a new release of my Prototype Window Class ( http://blogus.xilinus.com/pages/javawin ) I added few things according to a lot of emails I got. Not sure if it''s the correct mailing list to use. If not let me know where I can post this announce. Thanks Seb

Hi The FreeBSD port has been updated for the DoS vulnerability but the version is still the same. See: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/security/clamav/ David Peall Systems Administrator Western Cape Schools' Network http://www.wcsn.org.za/ PO Box 44460, Claremont 7735, Cape Town Fax +27 (021) 683-6766, Helpdesk +27 (021) 674-9140 > -----Original Message----- > From:

>I am trying to compile R-0.65 on a Sparc 20. I have gcc 2.7.2.2 and I >have SC4.0. I used gcc to compile R-0.64.2 in July with no problems. >Now when I run configure for R-0.65 I get the following message: > >>checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no >>configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables. > >and

I am trying to compile R-0.65 on a Sparc 20. I have gcc 2.7.2.2 and I have SC4.0. I used gcc to compile R-0.64.2 in July with no problems. Now when I run configure for R-0.65 I get the following message: >checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no >configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables. and then configure exits. I had no